- MarsBloke07
- uploaded: Dec 25, 2012
- Hits: 3831
Check out this webpage - https://sites.google.com/site/thefaceonmarssolved/ I put it together after I put the video on Disclose.tv. Its easier to take in and has on it what I forgot to explain in the video. This Video is the proof that proves Richard C. Hoagland and Zecharia Sitchin are right. There was a civilization on Mars and it was of the earths very ancient past. Video originally on Youtube - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r1L5_tbF5Oc
It might be slow but wait till you see what is revealed. Its AWESOME.
5 comments
-
MarsBloke07 April 8, 2013 9:01:00 AM CEST
G’day Kaneb, I’m not insulted by your comments at all. I’m quite the opposite. Thank you for them. No I’m not hinting that MAD magazine or the foldout in it was an alien invention but it would be cool if it was.
All the elements of Aztec, Egyptian and Cambodian art etc that you can see can all be explained by Zecharia Sitchin. I recommend reading his books The 12th Planet and The Lost Book of Enki, if you haven’t already. They will help you understand who created the Face on Mars, well I believe. He is the only one I have found to be close to any logical or reasonable answer to the mysteries of the ancient world. But yet he is only one piece of the puzzle.
About your testing mine and Richard C. Hoagland’s theory on a negative subject at random, I would like to see your results that show the same elements that exist in my pictures, so that all can see clearly what is there in the original images and the traced images as I have with my pictures. But as you have stated yourself, your results were based totally on your imagination because you wanted to see them there. My results are not based on imagination but actual evidence that exists on the surface of the Face on Mars.
I am not talented enough to create the pictures I present. The only artistic talent or imagination i used was in adding the colour. The details I present are actually on the surface of the Face on Mars. Half of the pictures I present are 100% real and the details within them are 100% on the surface of the Face on Mars. For me to have used my imagination I would have had to use details that do not exist on the surface of the Face on Mars, which I did not!!! Half of everything that I show in my pictures is 100% on the surface of the Face on Mars. All I have done is mirrored that one half to reveal what is hidden and as you have confessed yourself, you can see what I present is 100% there and therefore is not what I want to see but what is 100% actually there on the surface of the Face on Mars when half is mirrored. Look abit more closely at the details upon the surface of the Face on Mars in the original 2001 photograph by N.A.S.A and you will see that all the pictures I present are 100% there and real, in half, on the surface of the Face on Mars. It is not my imagination or pareidolia.
For me to have created the details upon the surface of the Face on Mars to create my pictures I would have had to been able to go to Mars and create the Face on Mars before N.A.S.A even took any photographs of it and this is a total impossibility.
Therefore what I present in my pictures is real and is arranged in half on the surface of the Face on Mars as N.A.S.A confesses everything on the surface in the 2001 photograph of the Face on Mars is 100% on it and real!!!
Check out this webpage I put together that’s easier to take in and what I forgot to explain in the video. https://sites.google.com/site/thefaceonmarssolved/
-
Kaneb April 2, 2013 1:11:32 PM CEST
Are you hinting that Mad magazine and the foldout is an alien invention? I loved Mad magazine as a kid. I always thought the humour was unique. Explains alot.
Kidding aside, it was entertaining to watch. The images are beautiful. There are elements in them that combine the styles of Aztec, Egyptian and Cambodian art, to name a few. I could make out the cats, rams, bulls etc. I even saw bigfoot. However, I must point out that I believe our mind sees what it wants to see. We see faces and objects in clouds or trees. Nevertheless, I was intrigued by your images.
I decided to test your theory for myself on a negative test subject. In other words, an alternatIve image depicting a different landmark chosen at random. I used a high detail satellite image taken of a crater on Mars. I applied your technique to the image. I saw cats, rams, bulls, and yes, good old bigfoot. The same elements repeated themselves over and over.
In one image, I could make out a very convincing bull head with huge elegant horns. Directly above the horns was a cat with eyes that resembled the eye of horus. The cat formed part of what looked like an elaborate head dress that radiated out like rays of the sun. Right at the very top was something that looked like a cobra. How could I see the same elements that exist in your images? The answer obviously is because I wanted to see them. This is how our brains are hardwired.
I hope you are not insulted by my comment. My intention is to be honest, not offensive. The images are amazing, their eye candy value made watching the clip worthwhile. However, the only thing you proved to me is that you have an imaginative mind and an artistic talent.
Peace.
-
danwiberg9 December 30, 2012 8:43:13 PM CET
Basically valueless.
-
MarsBloke07 December 26, 2012 9:24:39 AM CET
Sorry about that just_the_flu, I'm very much the amateur and never have done anything like this before. Writing is the only way I know how to get this out to the world. It took me forever just work work out the program to do this on. I would have never got it out there if did it differently.
Try pausing the video, then you will be able to read it.
-
just_the_flu December 26, 2012 5:49:09 AM CET
no offense, i hate reading movies... especially when you have to be a speed reader...
sorry :( i probably missed a lot of good information... me too stoopid to read movies way too fast















