10 Comment
14 Ratings:

Leaked Video of Cruise Missile Hitting Pentagon on 911?

  • Kanaeta
  • uploaded: Jan 15, 2013
  • Hits: 1637

Description:

Andy Rogers· youtube 9/2/2011
Leaked Video of Cruise Missile Hitting Pentagon on 911?

Suppressed video released 10 years after 9/11 attacks in the United States clearly shows the Pentagon attack was a Cruise type missile, either a Tomahawk or Russian/Soviet Granit as described by former officer of the Soviet nuclear intelligence Dimitri Khalezov.

The little explosions which have been circled in the video clearly point out that "there is no huge jet" hammering into the Pentagon, Khalezov explains.
According to the official U.S. government narration, an American Airline Boeing 757 struck the Pentagon on September 11, 2001.
The Boeing 757 is a mid-size, narrow-body twin-engine jet airliner manufactured by Boeing Commercial Airplanes. Its dimension specification include: Wing span 38.05m (124ft 10in), length 47.32m (155ft 3in), height 13.56m (44ft 6in). Wing area 185.3m2 (1994sq ft).
The author of "The third truth about September 11" says every time he uploads such videos on the internet "my YouTube gets deleted or the hits go down."
He describes a hole that appeared in a Pentagon wall right after the attack. "Look at that little hole. No way a jet [can] fit in there. Where's the wings? Where's the engines?"
The researcher says when the footage is observed frame by frame it shows that "the explosion happens before the 'jet' even appears."
After 11 September 2001, Khalezov undertook extensive research on the collapse of the three World Trade Center Towers. The research is claimed to demonstrate that the three towers were demolished by three underground thermo-nuclear explosions.
Moreover, Khalezov claims that he knew about the in-built so-called "emergency nuclear demolitions scheme" for the Twin Towers as long ago as the 1980's, while a serviceman in the Soviet Special Control Service.
http://www.presstv.ir/usdetail/196559.html
Also view:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5TUlOOSPWZI&feature=uploademail



Previous Media Next Media
Show more Show less

10 comments

  • jeffings#

    jeffings January 20, 2013 8:36:54 PM CET

    Tommyr, if you don't believe in this bullshit as you call it, why did you watch. I mean for that matter why do you even come to disclose.tv? Do you come here just to debunk(which in my opinion you haven't done, you haven't proven anything)? That seems to me to be a huge waste of your and my time don't you think? Show me one camera shot clearly showing a American Airlines Jet hitting the Pentagon. Just one! The PTB don't want you to know what really hit the Pentagon or every camera including the multitudes surrounding the building would be on display. This is the best evidence available. Except it or get out.

  • jeffings#

    jeffings January 20, 2013 8:27:40 PM CET

    Does government work pay well these days Rahkriga?

  • Ancientfossil#

    Ancientfossil January 20, 2013 7:26:46 PM CET

    anything on corporate media is only 1/3 of any truth... Corporate media is a propaganda machine with cheap entertainment...continue to investigate on your own...keep an open mind! We live in the age of Kali Yuga ...mass deception prevails...be alert.

  • tomhbomb1963#

    tomhbomb1963 January 20, 2013 12:55:19 PM CET

    iF A CIVLIAN AIR LIBER CRASHED, THE AREA WOULD BE CLOSED OFF FOR EXAMINATION FOR DAYS NOT CLEARED IN A FEW HOURS.

    This is one of the most important buildings in the USA and it would have dozens if not a hundred cameras looking at the outside from inside and from afar looking back at it.

    If there is no decent footage of what really happened you had better sack all these people ebacuse thye are wasting your dolalrs and doing a really poor job.

    If one person in the USA front up to their local federal politcian at their office thye will be ignored, if 2000+ per seat do then they have a large problem. How do you restart democracy of the people for the people by the people, Remember your real vote is how and with whom you spend your next dollar, but you have to think about it. This way you can counter all the money spent by the corporate lobbyists.

    Start with the suppression of indian hemp and the 20 trillion in fuel imports its cost the usa since WW2 , yes you could have been running every vehicle on hemp biodiesel grown on 6% of your arable land, plus got paper, cloth, food, mixed with limestone a building material to stand hundreds of year and so much more. see http://www.hempcar.org" title="www.hempcar.org" rel="external nofollow">www.hempcar.org.

    When they say marijuana educate them, hemp has less than 0.2 thc and will Colorada and washington state despite legalising indian hemp get to grow if for the above, not drugs . marijuana has from 5-30% thc. So dont confuse the two and dont let others delude others.

    Start on this and keep going.

    Go to youtube and search hemp war conspiracy and see how a single american jack herrer has largely stopped the suppression of this manna from heaven . God help the first world when the less developed world realises how easy they could meet their needs if hemp had not been willfully suppressed post world war 2. Thats because the UN gave no aid if you cultivated indian hemp.

    Plus get your self a copy of the 1994 australian doco " billion dollar crop".

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nu7q_-R5NX0

    Have alook at the other video's on this channel too. Some are out there, but the unbelievable truth is in front of our eyes anyway.

    Subscirbe to the great informatibes newsletters on http://www.mercola.com" title="www.mercola.com" rel="external nofollow">www.mercola.com about health, GMO and more. Thye have 1.6 million subscribers and more are needed to move the masses.

  • jeffings#

    jeffings January 16, 2013 2:30:01 AM CET

    It just fascinates me that the argument is based on video quality considering the HD quality video the government gave us. The shot was taken from a helicopter, obviously from an oriental news report from miles away and probably a third generation copy. The argument should be whether it is a missile or a jet and it sure to hell is too small to be a 757. I think the photo of a cruise missile panted up with windows and an American Airlines logo on the tail is very suspicious. Even if that isn't the exact ordinance used, why would they paint a missile like that in the first place.

  • Zanzibarjack#

    Zanzibarjack January 15, 2013 7:48:51 PM CET

    Maybe it's that blurry because it was taken from a cctv camera focussed on something a lot closer. Whether the footage is fake or not, the official story is the most fake of all.

  • Rahkriga#

    Rahkriga January 15, 2013 2:58:02 PM CET

    Just ask yourself...what camera filmed this?? And why would anybody use a camera that is this blurry?? The blur is intentional to hide the amateurish editing.

  • Rahkriga#

    Rahkriga January 15, 2013 2:55:15 PM CET

    This video is a hoax that has been circulating for years now. The tracking on the "missile" is just horrible...and shadows are incorrect. Really wish people wouldnt keep posting this...its fake, and it doesnt help or change anything to post hoaxes...especially ones that are years old

  • Keiththeseat#

    Keiththeseat January 15, 2013 4:58:42 AM CET

    WTF, where did you find this other footage of the missile?



‚Äč  
Visit Disclose.tv on Facebook