2 Ratings:


  • Beforealt
  • uploaded: Sep 10, 2013
  • Hits: 2959


  • Ancientfossil#

    Ancientfossil September 12, 2013 12:19:30 AM CEST

    With Tommyr speaking like he does, he wants close minded people, sheeple,to speak and think like him, it is okay to think outside the box, always, always question authority...and the corporate mass propaganda machine, the Nazis would be very proud of these NEOCONS....good post!

  • properREDeye#

    properREDeye September 11, 2013 5:06:11 PM CEST

    Cool video, havent seen this one before. Probably because its obviously not a plane. Any commercial pilot will tell you that angle of approach would be impossible for a start. Then what about that jet fuel that supposedly melted steel at a temperature 2000 degrees above its burning temperature in the towers, they didnt have any on this supposed plane? Ok if you can look past those first two inconsistencies, why were there no titamium engine parts found? Those things are virtually indestructable, certainly much harder than bricks and concrete and couldnt be burned by the temperature of any fire an ordinary plane can make. It is physically impossible with the evidence presented for there to have been 2 huge jet engines crash into that building and leave no engine debris or scarring on the building face, it is fantasy to think otherwise

  • Bellx15#

    Bellx15 September 11, 2013 11:17:48 AM CEST

    When you say it's too small, I am just wondering how you came to that opinion. Have you calculated how large it should look as a passenger plane? The Pentagon is huge, and this is a wide-angle lens, making things at the far end of it look much smaller.

    I don't think it necessarily looks too small, but what does bother me is how it is so close to the ground, flying so fast. We know it didn't plough into the ground, so how did it do that? Passenger planes can't fly like that, can they?

  • Stevcolx#

    Stevcolx September 10, 2013 2:41:52 PM CEST

    Still looks like a Cruise Missile. Too small and quick to be a plane. And the fact that the windows were not damaged by wings is another question. And there are no wing and or tail sections or any wreckage at all makes it obvious it wasn't a plane!

Visit Disclose.tv on Facebook