14 Comment
10 Ratings:


  • 8seconds
  • uploaded: Dec 17, 2013
  • Hits: 11829


  • Jayson1972#

    Jayson1972 January 13, 2014 6:29:46 PM CET

    Please learn your left from right before you try to sound like you might know what you are talking about Ffs.
    Upper left hand corner not right. You are really gaping at straws here man.

  • Mikesingh#

    Mikesingh December 26, 2013 2:19:27 PM CET

    By the way, that image at 9:46 was discovered by me a couple of years ago. THIS IMAGE IS NOT FROM THE MOON BUT MARS. The software use was the IAS viewer which I used to analyze images from the Hirise album.
    I see that my name at the bottom right has been brushed out too!
    C'mon man, you can do better than that!

  • tampawakos#

    tampawakos December 26, 2013 12:02:44 AM CET

    As usual, great work. nice piece. I just added it to my favorites. thanks.

  • Ottomatic1#

    Ottomatic1 December 22, 2013 9:04:27 PM CET

    very biased.

  • Area51#

    Area51 December 22, 2013 11:38:51 AM CET

    Sure, because it's Chinese stuff, the pictures have not been retouched and the only source of true photos can be from the Chinese Government......yeah right. So much B.S in this video. 45 years of technology separates NASA pictures from these. Besides, none of the stuff you have shown in this video would convince me they were anomalies...

  • matted#

    matted December 21, 2013 6:47:05 AM CET

    the moon isn't all 1 color on it's surface. rocks really? look at the shadow is small so your building has the same height as the rocks closer to camera. keep faking this CRAP

  • shamanhotep1#

    shamanhotep1 December 19, 2013 3:47:51 AM CET

    Well Goodie, the Chinese are doing the same thing all world governments have been doing since Babylon....and that's lying to us about reality. Yes there are very large structures and machines on the moon etc. And if they can "read a car tag from space"...they could Hubble your ass a foto that You don't have to see "table legs und Jabba" in. This is not a revelation and not even entertaining. We aren't in the club.

  • Jeffinsydney#

    Jeffinsydney December 19, 2013 2:12:03 AM CET

    I am one of your Youtube subscribers.
    You have completely lost me with your assertions that we are only now viewing the genuine moon surface as NASA was not genuine.............?...............REALLY?

    The dif' in photo quality has a lot to do with advances made over forty plus years in lenses and digital technology.
    Look at some of the footage on Youtube of anything from the 60's right here on earth and you will see a huge dif' between what we take for granted (now) and what was acceptable imaging then.
    Have you lost your ability to keep an open and honest mind?

    Then there is the assertion that quite clearly; what is a rock really is not a rock!
    Jabba the hut????

    I have no doubt we have company on the moon.
    Based on evidence, and recent evidence at that it is quite clear the USA DID land on the moon in the 60's.
    Add the fact that Russia HATED the USA with such passion during the moon landings, that if the landings were faked they would have exposed it; instead the Russians confirmed the radio and TV signals coming from the US astronauts on the moon.

    How old are you Tyler ? 3?
    Go peddle your conspiracy theories someplace else. As evidenced by the above comments no one here is buying your tripe.

  • Michael777#

    Michael777 December 19, 2013 2:06:43 AM CET

    Nobody finds it curious that there is only about a 1/2inch of dirt and dust on a surface we are told is billions of years old, with not a breath of wind or rain? The stuff in my garage can accumulate nearly that amount of dust in a couple years..

    As for the rest of it, i really didn't see anything that could not simply be an odd rock formation.... but hey, the military is spending trillions of dollars somewhere, so why not on the moon.

  • Crusader#

    Crusader December 18, 2013 2:53:20 PM CET

    Stay in your bedroom Tyler

Visit Disclose.tv on Facebook