9//11 NIST denies evidence of molten steel at the WTC Site (compilation)
- Uploaded by Abovetopvideos on Feb 23, 2014
- Views: 66
A compilation i put together ,focusing on NISTs denial of any evidence of molten steel/metal at the World Trade Center /Ground Zero on the day of ,and preceeding days of the attacks on 11th September particular note is eyewitness David Long,for those of you from Canada you may recognise him,his full account is 47 mins long and is posted on truthactionottawa search "eyewitness to molten metal david long ,on my channel,the link is in the info box of that first part is a video first posted 5 years ago from ae911truth,the rest i stuck together using various clips i have seen over the know to seasoned 9/11 researchers this is not new material,but i thought it could help as an archive for new-comers,and anyone looking for material for a film project hope many of you out there will download it and repost it onto your channels is a quote from NISTs website and i would draw your attention to the last "there is no evidence of similar molten liquid" the clip at shoots that claim down in reported (NIST NCSTAR 1-5A) that just before 9:52 , a bright spot appeared at the top of a window on the 80th floor of WTC 2, four windows removed from the east edge on the north face, followed by the flow of a glowing liquid. This flow lasted approximately four seconds before subsiding. Many such liquid flows were observed from near this location in the seven minutes leading up to the collapse of this tower. There is no evidence of similar molten liquid pouring out from another location in WTC 2 or from anywhere within WTC ,according to NIST the "flow" lasted 4 "4 windows in "from the east edge of the north seconds ,are they Mr Gross what about the clip beginning at your statement tthat "There is no evidence of similar molten liquid pouring out from another location in WTC 2 or from anywhere within WTC1."2 things of note "molten liquid".?? Unbelievably mis-leading quite clearly like i mentioned earlier shows a different definitely not "4 windows in"