Please rate:

Oil Leak Effect Coverup in Pensacola 7-2-10

  • Puzzlgrl
  • uploaded: Jul 3, 2010
  • Hits: 61


  • Puzzlgrl#

    Puzzlgrl July 5, 2010 9:59:48 PM CEST

    Yeah, I know this guy is not "sophisticated", but he and Gregg from my other uploads are the only people able to "film" with their camera phones because media is not allowed into the area.

  • Puzzlgrl#

    Puzzlgrl July 5, 2010 9:57:36 PM CEST

    Reporters of all kinds are threatened with arrest -- this guy is only able to film this on his camera phone as is Gregg from Pensacola if you look at my other videos you'll front end loaders with sand. No cameras are being allowed in the area at all. The "Joe-Blow Private Citizens" are giving us on the spot proof with camera phones.

  • Gesuskhrist#

    Gesuskhrist July 4, 2010 7:24:07 AM CEST

    the guy in this video is just looking for more camera time...he must like looking at himself, his videos are boring and have no facts...just speculation....get a different hobby bud

  • Hiyosilver#

    Hiyosilver July 3, 2010 2:02:17 PM CEST

    There surely would be evidence if sand was brought in to cover oil. If any evidence was present, the man in the video did not show it. Bulldozers, frontend loaders (at least tracks), sand dredgers not far from shore, observation of MANY trucks bringing in sand, staging area, etc. Great quantities of oil would require great quantities of sand and covering the oil would be a continuous operation. Not justifying the official position, mind you, just presenting realistic possible events needed to covering the oil. Perhaps the reporter was permitted into an area of little damage/activity?

Visit on Facebook