5 Ratings:

FREEMASON ADMITS WORSHIPING LUCIFER AND JESUS

  • Djice9
  • uploaded: Sep 17, 2010
  • Hits: 349

Description:

Freemason Shriner admits that Masons worship Lucifer. He goes on to say that Jesus is also his leader and the son of God. His God, Lucifer. He also say's Jesus is his worshipful Master. For some time now I djice9 have been warning everyone that The false Image of Jesus is in fact the Antichrist. Christs name was not Jesus. It is Yah'Shua. Yah'Shua means Yahweh is Salvation. Just as HallaluYAH means Praise Yahweh. I have so much info for you all. google djice9

Please help this video make the DiscloseTV top 10 by Rating it. Commenting on it and Sharing it. Also Check out my other video's on how to Summon the Chariots of Yahweh using Prayer.



Previous Media Next Media
Show more Show less

4 comments

  • Gfysmd#

    Gfysmd February 9, 2011 2:55:51 PM CET

    (correction it was added in the king james version, trpwire2 has it much better put than me

  • Gfysmd#

    Gfysmd February 9, 2011 2:48:19 PM CET

    Lucifer and satan are not the same thing. Lucifer means light-bearer, he's referring to the "morning star" from Isaiah 14:12 . The books Dante's inferno, Paradise Lost, are the ones who used the names satan and lucifer interchangeably, not any canonically translated version of the bible. Hence the reason he has faith in Christ, and why the shriners are benevolent and good hearted people. It's just a confusion over a name

  • Trpwire2#

    Trpwire2 September 17, 2010 8:42:50 PM CEST

    myself, and what I learned may upset many Christians, who have to be told that the King James version of the Bible, which they revere as the literal, precise, correct work of God, is not always so. Some of the error in it was quite deliberate, including the biblical designation of Lucifer as Satan, along with the concordant story of a fallen angel. It is difficult to anticipate the reactions of some believers on being told that there are gross mistakes in the King James version, but, please, do not throw this book across the room in disgust until you have read a bit more." "Lucifer makes his appearance in the fourteenth chapter of the Old Testament book of Isaiah, at the twelfth verse, and nowhere else: "How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! How art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!"" "The first problem is that Lucifer is a Latin name. So how did it find its way into a Hebrew manuscript, written before there was a Roman language? To find the answer, I consulted a scholar at the library of the Hebrew Union College in Cincinnati. What Hebrew name, I asked, was Satan given in this chapter of Isaiah, which describes the angel who fell to become the ruler of hell? The answer was a surprise. In the original Hebrew text, the fourteenth chapter of Isaiah is not about a fallen angel, but about a fallen Babylonian king, who during his lifetime had persecuted the children of Israel. It contains no mention of Satan, either by name or reference. The Hebrew scholar could only speculate that some early Christian scribes, writing in the Latin tongue used by the Church, had decided for themselves that they wanted the story to be about a fallen angel, a creature not even mentioned in the original Hebrew text, and to whom they gave the name "Lucifer."" "Why Lucifer? In Roman astronomy, Lucifer was the name given to the morning star (the star we now know by another Roman name, Venus). The morning star appears in the heavens just before dawn, heralding the rising sun. The name derives from the Latin term lucem ferre, "bringer, or bearer, of light." In the Hebrew text the expression used to describe the Babylonian king before his death is Helal, son of Shahar, which can best be translated as "Day star, son of the Dawn." The name evokes the golden glitter of a proud king's dress and court (much as his personal splendor earned for King Louis XIV of France the appellation, "The Sun King")." "The scholars authorized by the militantly Catholic King James I to translate the Bible into current English did not use the original Hebrew texts, but used versions translated from the Catholic Vulgate Bible produced largely by St. Jerome in the fourth century. Jerome had mistranslated the Hebraic metaphor, "Day star, son of the Dawn," as "Lucifer," and over the centuries a metamorphosis took place. Lucifer the morning star became a disobedient angel, cast out of heaven to rule eternally in hell. Theologians, writers, and poets interwove the myth with the doctrine of the Fall, and in Christian tradition Lucifer is now the same as Satan, the Devil, and - ironically- the Prince of Darkness." "So "Lucifer" is nothing more than an ancient Latin name for the morning star, the bringer of light. That can be confusing for Christians who identify Christ himself as the morning star, a term used as a central theme in many Christian sermons. Jesus refers to himself as the morning star in Revelation 22:16: "I Jesus have sent mine angel to testify unto you these things in the churches. I am the root and the offspring of David, and the bright and morning star."" "And so there are those who do not read beyond the King James version of the Bible, who say "Lucifer is Satan: so says the Word of God," while others with knowledge of the Latin and Hebrew texts say, "No, Lucifer is the classical Roman name for the morning star, and now Jesus is the morning star." This discussion can only anger certain fundamentalists. (I have at hand an evangelical tract from a Baptist church that says, "I believe in the Infallibility and Preservation of God's Word, of which the King James 1611 authorized version is the God-guided faithful translation.")"

  • Gloomylunatic#

    Gloomylunatic September 17, 2010 8:15:36 PM CEST

    i already posted this but ill support you good ish!!!



 
Visit Disclose.tv on Facebook