Please rate:

9/11 and 7/7 evidence not discounted

  • Uploaded by Evildweeb on May 7, 2011
  • Hits: 3

9/11 - No Thermite, 7/7 - No Rucksack Bombs, Andrew Johnson

Both 7/7 and 9/11 are riddled with unbelievable official accounts. Andrew Johnson discusses both events. While there are many conspiracy theorists, one has to ask; "Who to believe?". Andrew is not a conspiracy theorist, he, like Dr Judy Wood, examines the evidence.

................................................................................­............

[Explanation received from Dr Judy Wood:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ms1uUZX_g2I

The main ingredients of thermite are rust and powdered aluminum.

The buildings were steel structures with aluminum cladding. The majority of the buildings were turned to dust/powder. So, it would be expected to have large quantities of powdered aluminum and powdered iron-rust in the dust. Something would be more seriously wrong if these ingredients were not found in the dust. The question should be about why the building turned to powder. Focusing on only the powder and referring to it as some of the ingredients of something with a special name (thermite, super thermite, nano-sized thermite, spray-on thermite...) is a diversion AWAY FROM the evidence.

The dust contained ingredients of chocolate-chip cookies, too.
But chocolate-chip cookies cannot turn a building into powder in mid air ...and neither can thermite.

To explain what happened to the buildings, you must explain what can turn a building to powder in mid air and account for all the other anomalies that have been documented.

Also, eggs go "boom" in a microwave oven. That doesn't mean that eggs destroyed the WTC because you heard a boom there. ]

[Dr Judy Wood has just discussed Nano Thermite here:
http://www.frequency.com/video/coast-to-coast-am-where-did-towers-go-dr/... ]

................................................................................­.............

Having made a video of Dr Judy Wood's work: ("911 - Incredible images with original questions" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hWGa7tPbXMo - 24,000 views), I have never experienced such a concerted and devious effort to discredit someone's work. So much so as to make me realize she is onto the truth. Likewise I have uncovered similar anomalies while making 7/7 videos, ("7/7 Just another False Flag " - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n0XfTCpskaA - 10,000 views) that no form of conventional explosives were used. In the inquest it seemed it was always the government's lawyer referring to an explosion, not the public, it was as if he were putting words into people's mouths.

Andrew Johnson has a scientific background, and he champions Dr Judy Wood's analysis of the 9/11 events, she also has a scientific background.

Please also see: all the pertinent info about thermite at http://911thermitefree.blogspot.com - and many of its main promoters are there.

Andrew Johnson's web site: http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php

Dr Judy Wood's web site: http://www.drjudywood.com

Andrew Johnson's YouTube Channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/adjuk#g/u

Link to Photographer mentioned who was (levitated) carried away David Handschuh: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ulE9OiZqQwg

More 9/11 and 7/7 videos I have made here: http://www.youtube.com/user/108morris108#grid/user/057F638C43C62A9A

by 108morris108 on May 5, 2011

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vj0QArURtKg



Previous Media Next Media
Show Description Hide Description

Recommended




 
Visit Disclose.tv on Facebook