18 Ratings:

Dna update results on the starchild 2011

  • Djdamm
  • uploaded: Aug 14, 2011
  • Hits: 355


  • Somethgblue#

    Somethgblue August 22, 2011 5:52:14 AM CEST

    The amount of information in the form of books and scientific research suppressed or outright censored here in America in the last 100 years is truly staggering. The person that won't believe until it is printed in a mainstream 'scientific' journal would get the watered down (for the sheep eyes) only version anyway.To become aware one must learn to trust your heart while learning to open your mind. Critical Thinking is no longer a tool that the common man keeps sharp, preferring to be told what to believe.Genesis For A New Space Age a book written in 1980, (but never published) using only government sources (revealed through the Freedom of Information Act) and some brave men and woman in our Govt. shows beyond a doubt that our Govt. has been aware of ET's for at least the last 100 years.These and other discoveries are no accident but are being 'discovered' and 'revealed' as a way of awakening those that are unwilling to trust their hearts and open their minds. When another 30 million people on the surface of this planet become aware, then Ascension will become inevitable and the truth will be revealed for all.Should be interesting . . .

  • Bigfoot228#

    Bigfoot228 August 21, 2011 6:56:37 PM CEST

    Great vid, thanks Djdamn. As usual, I see a lot of comments from people here who seem to have a vested interest in convincing you that what you see in the vid is invalid. even going as far as to offer a link sending you to a seperate page where they would like you to be convinced by a viewpoint completely opposite to those shown here. In the world of ufo's and alien research apparently even DNA evidence can be debunked now. Surprising the lengths some will go to try and convince you that what you see is an illusion. They want you to feel guilty and gullible for believing. They plant seeds of doubt. It is up to you to decide for yourself. Take everything in the comment section with a grain of salt (my comment included) for they are nothing more then opinion.

  • Temps13#

    Temps13 August 17, 2011 11:37:36 PM CEST

    this is just it,it wont be in a 'reputable scientific journal',as ,well for one reason,house of rothschild owns all media and news agencies such as reuters and associated press..these elite do not want the masses to know..duh..wake up and realise how little you actually know

  • Djdamm#

    Djdamm August 16, 2011 12:37:40 AM CEST


  • Phibermon#

    Phibermon August 16, 2011 12:30:48 AM CEST

    I'll believe it when I read about it in a reputable scientific journal. If there is undeniable scientific evidence then the majority of scientists who see that evidence will validate the discovery. Currently there's this video and the claims on the starchild website. When 'New Scientist', 'Nature' and 'Scientific American' all run stories confirming this alleged evidence to be fact, then I'll get excited. So far several reputable, well respected and more importantly; published scientists have declared that the skulls is a result of congenital hydrocephalus and that the DNA contains both X and Y chromosomes. This can only be the case if both parents were human as each parent will contribute one of the chromosomes. The result of "No significant similarity found" is misleading. The website claims that this was during the BLAST test and that this is signifigant. However, take a look at this page detailing information regarding the different messages from the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST), the tool that the starchild website states was used to analyse the fragments : http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/Blast. cgi?CMD=Web&PAGE_TYPE=BlastDocs&DOC_TYPE= FAQ#nohits It lists other possible causes for such a result, which neither this video nor the starchild website makes apparent. If they are presenting their evidence as scientific fact, then why hide very important facts about the process from the public view? That is not the action of a scientist nor one who wishes to follow the scientific method.

  • Tbonea1dam1#

    Tbonea1dam1 August 15, 2011 7:42:54 PM CEST

    so it begins!

  • Mikemess#

    Mikemess August 14, 2011 9:37:20 PM CEST

    WTF is wrong with these scientist? Pisses me off!!

Visit Disclose.tv on Facebook