4 Ratings:

DNA results shows the skull is alien 2011 update


Starchild Skull 2011 update: DNA results shows the skull is alien

Grey Alien | Starchild Skull

The starchild skull came into the possession of Lloyd Pye in February 1999 , the skull was found around 1930 in a mine tunnel about 100 miles (160 km) southwest of Chihuahua, Mexico, buried alongside a normal human skeleton that was exposed and lying supine on the surface of the tunnel.

Previous Media Next Media
Show more Show less


  • Theyear2010#

    Theyear2010 August 19, 2011 6:59:19 AM CEST

    yes, they should use the alien's dna to implant with human egg so we can all can witness a real life alien and that alien can help our world to advance much further into the future.

  • Mrralleycat#

    Mrralleycat August 16, 2011 2:25:39 AM CEST

    Many take this on faith. Others, Seem to be from MO. Being that I was born there. I am of the show me strain.

  • Auslight#

    Auslight August 16, 2011 2:08:25 AM CEST

    actually the tests show it has two human parents.but thats boring

  • Phibermon#

    Phibermon August 16, 2011 12:27:08 AM CEST

    I'll believe it when I read about it in a reputable scientific journal. If there is undeniable scientific evidence then the majority of scientists who see that evidence will validate the discovery. Currently there's this video and the claims on the starchild website. When 'New Scientist', 'Nature' and 'Scientific American' all run stories confirming this alleged evidence to be fact, then I'll get excited. So far several reputable, well respected and more importantly; published scientists have declared that the skulls is a result of congenital hydrocephalus and that the DNA contains both X and Y chromosomes. This can only be the case if both parents were human as each parent will contribute one of the chromosomes. The result of "No significant similarity found" is misleading. The website claims that this was during the BLAST test and that this is signifigant. However, take a look at this page detailing information regarding the different messages from the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST), the tool that the starchild website states was used to analyse the fragments : http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/Blast.cgi?CMD=Web&PAGE_TYPE=BlastDocs&;... It lists other possible causes for such a result, which neither this video nor the starchild website makes apparent. If they are presenting their evidence as scientific fact, then why hide very important facts about the process from the public view? That is not the action of a scientist nor one who wishes to follow the scientific method.

  • Ufologist#

    Ufologist August 15, 2011 6:07:19 PM CEST

    I CHALLENGE the US government to address this issue!!

  • Kuergun#

    Kuergun August 15, 2011 5:18:52 PM CEST

    Excellent Video but will the world accept this we shall see

  • Djdamm#

    Djdamm August 15, 2011 4:05:49 PM CEST

    Sorry put this on yesterday,its actually in the top 5 pet.

Visit Disclose.tv on Facebook