- uploaded: Apr 2, 2012
- Hits: 347
The dream of sailors, nerds and sailor-nerds everywhere is on the verge of coming true, senior Navy technologists swear. Within four years, they claim theyâ€™ll have a working prototype of a laser cannon, ready to place aboard a ship. And theyâ€™re just months away from inviting defense contractors to bid on a contract to build it for them.
â€œSubsonic cruise missiles, aircraft, fast-moving boats, unmanned aerial vehiclesâ€ â€” Mike Deitchman, who oversees future weapons development for the Office of Naval Research, promises Danger Room that the Navy laser cannons just over the horizon will target them all.
Or they will be, if ONRâ€™s plans work out as promised â€” not exactly a strong suit of proposed laser weapons over the decades. (Note the decided lack of blast at your side.) First step in reaching this raygun reality: Finish up the paperwork. â€œThe contract will probably have options go through four years, but depending on which laser source the vendors pick, we may be able to demo something after two years,â€ says Roger McGiness, who works on laser tech for Deitchman. â€œOur hope afterwards is to move to acquisition.â€
Translated from the bureaucrat: After the Office of Naval Research can prove the prototype works, itâ€™ll recommend the Navy start buying the laser guns. That process will begin in â€œ30 to 60 days,â€ adds Deitchman, when his directorate invites industry representatives for an informal idea session. Deitchman and McGiness plan on putting a contract out for the prototype â€œby the end of the year.â€
If this sounds like a rapid pace of development for the ultimate in science fiction weaponry, there are two major explanations why the Navy thinks the future makes a pew-pew-pew noise. The first is technological. The second is bureaucratic.
From a technological perspective, the Navy thinks maritime laser weapons finally represent a proven, mature technology. The key point came last April, when the Navy put a test laser firing a (relatively weak) 15-kilowatt beam aboard a decommissioned destroyer. Never before had a laser cannon at sea disabled an enemy vessel. But the Martime Laser Demonstrator cut through choppy California waters, an overcast sky and salty sea air to burn through the outboard engine of a moving motorboat a mile away. You can see video of the successful demonstration above.
The bureaucratic reason has to do with a decision inside the Office of Naval Research to focus its laser efforts with laser-like precision. For over a decade, itâ€™s dreamed of creating a massive, scalable laser weapon, called the Free Electron Laser, that can generate up to a megawattâ€™s worth of blast power. Currently, the laser blasts 14 kilowatts of light â€” think 140 lamps, all shining in the same direction and at the same wavelength. A hundred kilowatts is considered militarily useful; a megawatt beam would burn through 20 feet of steel in a single second.
The Free Electron Laser has its critics, including a Senate committee. And it was sucking up all the oxygen inside the Navyâ€™s laser efforts. So, as InsideDefense.com first reported, ONR decided, effectively, to break them up into the laser equivalent of weight classes. Generating a 100-kilowatt beam is now the province of â€œsolid state lasers,â€ lasers that focus light through a solid gain medium, like a crystal or a optical fibers. The Free Electron Laser, which uses magnets to generate its beam, will stay focused on getting up to a megawatt.
That, the Navyâ€™s scientists contend, will get an actual, working laser cannon onto a ship faster. Yes, a 100-kilowatt laser isnâ€™t as powerful as the longed-for megawatt gun. And yes, a solid-state laser canâ€™t operate on multiple wavelengths, while a Free Electron Laser can, making the mega-laser more useful when the sea air is full of crud and pollution. But the Office of Naval Research says that lots of active, near-term threats to ships will be vulnerable to the 100-kilowatt, solid state laser.
â€œItâ€™s easier to shrink down a solid-state laser [to get on a ship], and thereâ€™s a maturity here, vice the Free Electron Laser,â€ says Deitchman. â€œThe solid-state laser will still deal with many asymmetric threats, but not the most hardened, most challenging threats. Itâ€™s near-to-mid term. The Free Electron Laser is still long-term.â€
Thereâ€™s another advantage to developing a less-powerful laser first. The Navyâ€™s surface ships donâ€™t yet have the power generation necessary for spooling up a megawatt-class laser â€” or at least not if they donâ€™t want to potentially be dead in the water. Thatâ€™s one of the reasons the Senate Armed Services Committee is skeptical of the Free Electron Laser. Itâ€™s not clear that the ships can cope with diverting 100 kilowatts of power, either, but the Office of Naval Research thinks they can, and the laser geeks are â€œworking closelyâ€ with the Naval Sea Systems Command to make sure the scientists are writing checks that the shipâ€™s generators can cash.
But perhaps even more important is the fact that the Navy brass is on board with a concerted push for a new generation of shipboard weapons. â€œThis was a decision by the Office of Naval Research,â€ Deitchman says, â€œthat was approved and supported by senior Navy leadership.â€ The Navy may be set on a smaller fleet, but apparently it wants that fleet making pew-pew-pew noises.
FAIR USE NOTICE: The material on this channel is provided solely for educational and informational purposes. It may contain copyrighted material, the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Infringement of copyright is not intended. The material is made available to help educate people about health related issues. It is believed that this constitutes a 'FAIR USE' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17, section 107 of the US Copyright Law. The material is distributed without profit to those who would like to use such material for research and educational purposes. FAIR USE NOTICE The use of the media material found on this channel is protected by the Fair Use Clause of the U.S. Copyright Act of 1976, which allows for the rebroadcast of copyrighted materials for the purposes of commentary, criticism, and education.
This site may contain copyrighted material whose use has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to civil rights, economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science & technology, etc. We believe this constitutes a
'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.