5 Near Earth Asteroids=100 Trillion $ (USD)

Sat Oct 01, 2011 6:31 am » by **Myleso**

There are practically an infinite number of asteroids in the universe.

500 large NEA's at 10 Trillion $USD each at current market value is 5000 Trillion.

Sat Oct 01, 2011 5:30 pm » by **Myleso**

I tried to upload this video on DTV but it didn't work properly so i deleted it

No errors uploading it on youtube.

500 large Near Earth Asteroids at $10 Trillion $ each is 5000 Trillion. 20,000 mid sized asteroids valued at 250 Billion is 5000 Trillion.

The markets dont exist yet and it would not really be economical to bring most metals mined back to earth. Rare earth metals on earth are expensive and would be worth a lot of $ if brought back to earth.

I don't expect too many people would want to go up in space at first. Kind of like a childs fear of going into the water first. :lol:

Sat Oct 01, 2011 8:51 pm » by **Myleso**

I did upload again on on DTV and it worked.

http://www.permanent.com/a-mining.htm

One should fully understand the environment in which we are working.

An asteroid the size of a domed football stadium filled with ore (roughly equivalent to 100 meters wide, tall and long), contains 2,000,000 tons of material. (In comparison, the space shuttle has maximum capacity of less than 30 tons.)

The surface gravity of this 100 meter asteroid would be practically zero -- less than one ten-thousandth that of the Moon. The excape velocity would be around 0.3 kilometers per hour (0.2 miles per hour), or 0.1 meter per second. Drop an object at arm's length and it would take 5 minutes to fall to the ground.

If you have an asteroid double the size and hence seven times the mass, the gravity only doubles at its surface (since the surface is further from the center of mass).

This means that you don't launch and land on an asteroid the same way you do on the Moon, and you use propellant differently. Landing and relaunching using just a locking spring is not a bad idea, for example.

Material can be moved around easily, and structures erected don't have to be concerned about gravity, only operational stresses.

Attachment techniques in microgravity

One of the main challenges of dealing with an asteroid, whether it be probes or mining, is working in the microgravity environment. We have little experience in this. Once we gain some experimental experience, we will develop some routine techniques, and the first to gain experience will get some valuable patents. However, we have very little experience in microgravity to date, especially as regards something like an asteroid.

So far, the alternatives considered by various studies for surface attachment and mobility on, in and around an asteroid are:

Just relying on the microgravity and moving around ballistically ("hoppers"), by wheels or by crawling using a claw device (the claw in turn having many potential designs...)

Attaching a net and moving around along its cables
One penetrator attachment, and moving around by rigid crane, or ballistically by tether and winch
Two penetrator attachments with two loose tethers and winches, and move from location to location by moving one of the penetrators at a time
Three penetrator attachments with winches, holding device tightly down to the asteroid by tension of three cables
Using propellant to fly around from spot to spot
Magnetic attachment (iron rich asteroid)
Tunnelling in and pushing against opposite walls for wheels, treads or crawling

Penetrator attachments can be one or more of the following:
Simple spike
Harpoon with retractable catch
Screw device - helical drill

http://www.permanent.com/a-overvw.htm

Sat Oct 01, 2011 11:44 pm » by **Myleso**

http://english.pravda.ru/science/earth/26-09-2011/119156-meteor_shower-0/

Meteors are linked with the emergence of precious metals on our planet. According to the British and Swiss scientists, 200 million years after its formation, the Earth has been heavily bombarded by meteorites. Along with the asteroid matter the planet was hit with precious metals like gold, silver and platinum.

Sat Oct 01, 2011 11:54 pm » by **Frutty**

myleso wrote:http://english.pravda.ru/science/earth/26-09-2011/119156-meteor_shower-0/
Meteors are linked with the emergence of precious metals on our planet. According to the British and Swiss scientists, 200 million years after its formation, the Earth has been heavily bombarded by meteorites. Along with the asteroid matter the planet was hit with precious metals like gold, silver and platinum.

Precious Metals !Hmm this would confirm my theory, that's why once a meteor impacts earth, the military surround the area and the meteor is never heard of again! :banana:

Sun Oct 02, 2011 5:39 pm » by **Myleso**

http://beforeitsnews.com/story/1173/346/5_Near_Earth_Asteroids_100_Trillion_USD.html

Because I am banned (for sharing truth) I can not share this. Too much suppression, ignorance by those names in alternative media, you know who they are, look at what they report on, and what they are not.

This type of information could have been presented in zeitgeist or any other documentary in the past 4-5 years no problem. It was only because I recognized, hey nobody else is covering this, which made me start making my own videos and documentaries. I will be doing another documentary that gets into more depth of space settlement, asteroid colonies in 2012. Antimatter: The Future is Now barely got into detail.

http://mylesohowe.wordpress.com/2011/09/28/transhumanist-agenda-promoted-by-john-lewis-planetary-science-professor/

http://www.nss.org/resources/books/non_fiction/NF_011_miningthesky.html

Mining the Sky is one of the most important books space advocates can own because, as the author puts it, “we must address economic issues, or there will be no future space activity.” However, this is not an economics text. John Lewis, a planetary science professor, provides scientifically backed arguments for using space resources to address problems on Earth. We are in the same situation we were when the book was published, with added burdens of terrorism, culture wars, and increased energy costs. Lewis’s most important ideas are that we use materials and energy from space (in the form of space solar power) to reduce the resource crunch here on Earth. This work has never been timelier.

Lewis is similarly negative about using helium-3 from the Moon to power fusion reactors, as he states, “The concentration of helium-3 in regolith is actually astonishingly small (one ton of helium-3 for every one hundred million tons of regolith.” Lewis suggests that it would be better to scoop helium-3 from the atmosphere of Uranus and then describes a way to do it!

Lewis is also against full-scale terraforming of Mars. While he seems to have no problem with partial terraforming, he believes it is “arrogant” to completely remake Mars and instead believes human beings should “meet the planet halfway” and genetically modify ourselves to survive on a partially-terraformed world. Given the other activities Lewis proposes (moving Phobos and Deimos, building a space elevator), this attitude seems paradoxical.

Do I have to say more?

I am proving evidence for what david icke presents (not theory or questioning the moon) but holy crap anyone can hollow out an asteroid and move it like a spaceship..Why doesnt he want that info on his site? If someone could share this information I am presenting at websites like david icke it would help wake people up even more out of the depression negativity with all the bombardment of collapse propaganda.

http://mylesohowe.wordpress.com/2011/04/13/more-censorship-and-propaganda/
That blog post documents my getting banned at david icke and also shows someone he promotes on his headlines is propaganda. Maybe thats why I got banned proving the article was propaganda? http://www.henrymakow.com/pothead_says_marijuana_is_a_tr.html

that guy Henry Makow even goes as far to call people witches for their beliefs in a particular religion and he is spreading disinfo. http://www.henrymakow.com/aspen2.html

first words in the article are "George Lucas developed the spiritual format of Star Wars culture to be precisely Kabbalistic."
he fails to show the connection with the Christ.

one review says

Obviously written by a star wars fan and someone who has done a lot of thinking about the movies, the force, and how it all fits into faith in the Christ. It's a good read and will challenge your thinking and give you new insights into star wars and faith. It kept my interest and challenged my thinking. If you love star wars you should read this book.

Biblically literate Star Wars fans have long recognized similarities between Jedi teachings and biblical wisdom. Staub, a broadcaster and director of the Center for Faith and Culture in Seattle, artfully lays out many similarities for Christians who want to claim Jedi wisdom as their own. After seeing a Star Wars prequel, Staub realized that a young man he was mentoring wanted "to be a 'Jedi Christian,' " but Staub's generation had not produced a Yoda. To correct that, Staub takes on the role of a modern-day Yoda (the wise sage) by speaking directly to readers as aspiring Jedi Christians and doling out his understanding of Christian theology. Thankfully, Staub resists the urge to fit all-things-Jedi into a Christian framework, but instead picks and chooses from Jedi (as well as Buddhist, Jewish, Taoist and mystical) teachings, comparing what he finds with biblical wisdom. Because the book is so biblically oriented, it seems to be reaching out to young evangelical Christians, asking them to consider a more progressive tradition of Christian faith—one that embraces liberal Christian philosophers, theologians and mystics, and social and environmental activism. Using Jedi culture as a draw, Staub builds a number of bridges with this book that will keep coffeehouse theological discussions going at least as long as Star Wars films are popular.