9/11 New 3D analysis. Very Conclusive

Fri Aug 06, 2010 1:02 pm » by **Pindz**

Fri Aug 06, 2010 1:47 pm » by **Electrobadgr**

Nice pic n new avatar Pindz :flop:

Fri Aug 06, 2010 5:07 pm » by **Adamo21**

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/911_Aircra ... Deets.html

A Responsibility to Explain an Aeronautical Improbability
Dwain Deets
NASA Dryden Flight Research Center (Senior Executive Service - retired)
AIAA Associate Fellow

The airplane was UA175, a Boeing 767-200, shortly before crashing into World Trade Center Tower 2. Based on analysis of radar data, the National Transportation and Safety Board reported the groundspeed just before impact as 510 knots. This is well beyond the maximum operating velocity of 360 knots, and maximum dive velocity of 410 knots. The possibilities as I see them are: (1) this wasn’t a standard 767-200; (2) the radar data was compromised in some manner; (3) the NTSB analysis was erroneous; or (4) the 767 flew well beyond its flight envelope, was controllable, and managed to hit a relatively small target. Which organization has the greater responsibility for acknowledging the elephant in the room? The NTSB, NASA, Boeing, or the AIAA? Have engineers authored papers, but the AIAA or NASA won’t publish them? Or, does the ethical responsibility lie not with organizations, but with individual aeronautical engineers? Have engineers just looked the other way?

Dwain Deets credentials and experience are as follows:

Dwain Deets
MS Physics, MS Eng
Former Director, Aerospace Projects, NASA Dryden Flight Research Center
Served as Director, Research Engineering Division at Dryden
Recipient of the NASA Exceptional Service Award
Presidential Meritorious Rank Award in the Senior Executive Service (1988)
Selected presenter of the Wright Brothers Lectureship in Aeronautics
Associate Fellow - American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA)
Included in "Who's Who in Science and Engineering" 1993 - 2000
Former Chairman of the Aerospace Control and Guidance Systems
- Committee of the Society of Automotive Engineers
Former Member, AIAA Committee on Society and Aerospace Technology
37 year NASA career

The shills are all over this thread, working hard to keep people brainwashed. I find it very disturbing.

Fri Aug 06, 2010 7:51 pm » by **Pindz**

adamo21 wrote:The shills are all over this thread, working hard to keep people brainwashed. I find it very disturbing.

Thats True ! They even can do things like > you post some hard stuff video here from your youtube channel and next day video is removed and you have red copyright warnings there. :shooting:

Sun Aug 08, 2010 6:53 am » by **Adamo21**

This guy is definitely a shill.

Ok for the lurkers and real non-paid intelligent thinkers out there....Lets take a look at the videos posted by the shill, that he is using to try and back up his propaganda/brainwashed and retarded view.

Ok, do you notice the left side of the tower? The news media banner is directly covering up the fake plain exiting through the left side of the tower. Thats why the fade-to-black occurred, to hide the plane exiting and the FAKE PLANE, the video September Clues covers this, please watch the video, I'm sure the shill wouldn't want you to.

May'be this shill does not understand this SIMPLE CONCEPT?

Ok, this one doesn't even show the plane hitting or EXITING, its a cropped out version....wtf..? Why the hell did you even post this?

A camera malifunction? is that a fucking joke? Its taken by a damn helicopter? How come the Iraqi news station cameras did not malfunction during close combat coverage? And why did this 'malfunction' at the specific time the plane was exiting, I'm sure the intelligent free thinkers find this disturbing and suspicious, where is the video of the plane exiting without being covered up or blacked out? SHILL ALERT

Do you notice you never seen the plane exiting the left side of the tower?

Doesn't show the plane exiting the tower.

Clearly edited...this must be the worst shill cover-up ive ever seen on a forum..

Ok, all he did was post a gif of the SAME source black out video but before the black out occured, and tried to use this as evidence...he is clearl a shill, this forum should ban his ass.

Whoever is reading this, don't insult mankind by believing these pathetic attempts to cover up the truth, I know you're smarter then that.This shill is a traitor to mankind.

Sun Aug 08, 2010 7:19 am » by **Adamo21**

Who is more trust worthy

The shill, or this guy...

Dwain Deets

MS Physics, MS Eng
Former Director, Aerospace Projects, NASA Dryden Flight Research Center
Served as Director, Research Engineering Division at Dryden
Recipient of the NASA Exceptional Service Award
Presidential Meritorious Rank Award in the Senior Executive Service (1988)
Selected presenter of the Wright Brothers Lectureship in Aeronautics
Associate Fellow - American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA)
Included in "Who's Who in Science and Engineering" 1993 - 2000
Former Chairman of the Aerospace Control and Guidance Systems
- Committee of the Society of Automotive Engineers
Former Member, AIAA Committee on Society and Aerospace Technology
37 year NASA career

Mon Aug 09, 2010 1:28 am » by **Adamo21**

The point is that the main video with the 3d model shows that the video footage was edited, as you can tell in the gif's. They covered up the plane exiting the left side...thats the entire point...Dwain Deets testimony is important because it proves that the planes you see in the gif's are fake, as no commercial jet can operate at that altitude and speed.

There were no planes, they were added in.

Mon Aug 09, 2010 4:22 am » by **Braxtonhicks**

Remote controlled anti gravity drones! Yeah, that makes more sense than terrorists. Jesus, this site is getting more and more full of shit!

Mon Aug 09, 2010 6:20 am » by **Adamo21**

braxtonhicks wrote:Remote controlled anti gravity drones! Yeah, that makes more sense than terrorists. Jesus, this site is getting more and more full of shit!

Actually, it does make more sense, whats really really SAD, is how fucking stupid the general public(people like you) really are....its horrifying....really. How can you people be so fucking DUMB?

You seriously think terrorists hijacked a 747 and flew it at an altitude and speed that would tear the jet apart? And then defying physics bring down a building at FREE FALL SPEEDS???

God, you people are so stupid its sickening...and you have the evidence of an anti-gravity object, direct energy weapons, and you think the government hasn't been developing these technologies starting in the 1940's? Why are you people so dumb? Why do you want to RESIST the truth? Do you like being a stupid slave? Why cant you think for yourself?

Mon Aug 09, 2010 7:31 am » by **Adamo21**

jetxvii wrote:
adamo21 wrote:
braxtonhicks wrote:Remote controlled anti gravity drones! Yeah, that makes more sense than terrorists. Jesus, this site is getting more and more full of shit!

Actually, it does make more sense, whats really really SAD, is how fucking stupid the general public(people like you) really are....its horrifying....really. How can you people be so fucking DUMB?

You seriously think terrorists hijacked a 747 and flew it at an altitude and speed that would tear the jet apart? And then defying physics bring down a building at FREE FALL SPEEDS???

God, you people are so stupid its sickening...and you have the evidence of an anti-gravity object, direct energy weapons, and you think the government hasn't been developing these technologies starting in the 1940's? Why are you people so dumb? Why do you want to RESIST the truth? Do you like being a stupid slave? Why cant you think for yourself?

O_o

Yea I know, its too much for you're little brain to comprehend, just take it in slowly and maybe, just maybe you will un-brainwash yourself, you're gonna have to stop drinking that flouride water first, and I have no hope for you if that helps.