9/11 New 3D analysis. Very Conclusive

Posts: 69
Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 5:53 am

PostMon Aug 09, 2010 7:02 am » by Ronisrael

Who questions the Government version of 911 ?

Former German Defence Minister Andreas von Bülow Speaks About 9/11

Upload to Disclose.tv

here are the rest of them


http://www.wanttoknow.info/officialsque ... sionreport


1 page ,all the evidence - no planes at all 3 locations


9/11 & the Laws of Physics
that plane could not fly at that speed in that altitude - different professionals give the same answer

here is a taste :

Upload to Disclose.tv

and here is the full playlist

What happened to the passengers ?
Quote :
A frequently asked and presently unanswerable question is: what happened to the passengers and crew of the four passenger jets that were supposed to have crashed? While very little information about their deaths has surfaced there is evidence that there were fewer victims than has been reported.

NY based researcher Vincent Sammartino claims that the government seems to have faked the number of plane victims and also faked the number who claimed victim compensation.[25] According to Sammartino, of the 266[26] official names of passengers and crew who were supposed to have died in the four passenger jets, only 52 names have appeared on the Social Security Death Index (SSDI), a privately owned website not affiliated with the Social Security Administration. According to Sammartino, of the 52 listed as dead in the SSDI, which has an accuracy rate of about 83%, only 11 of the family members have claimed victim compensation (not counting 9/11 plane crash widow, Ellen Mariani, who has pointedly refused compensation).

Sammartino writes that his research was spurred in part because of a radio interview he heard with Ms. Mariani and her lawyer in which they spoke of their inability to locate other family members of the purported plane passengers.

If Sammartino’s figures are closer to reality than official reports, the discrepancies also go some way to advancing the NPT. If no planes were involved in the 9/11 attacks, and if Holmgren is right that Flights 11 and 77 did not fly that day (and Flights 93 and 175 did not crash that day), then it might have been easier for the terrorists to have diverted and perhaps disposed of merely 50-60 victims rather than many more bodies.

Or even better , from researcher hil Jayhan :
http://letsrollforums.com/happened-pass ... 20496.html

Quote :

This plausibly explains the following;

Hijacker mystery

Why the Cell phone calls needed to be made & were faked

Lack of Video of Passengers at 4 airports on 911

Why the 2 American Airlines flights, 11 & 77 show in the BTS database as not having flown

Stuart Air Force base mystery

Why there is video and photographic evidence showing both 11 & 175 to be military drones

Cleveland International Airport Mystery

Mystery of the missing people from 4 planes on 911

And it also gives an incredibly plausible explanation for the sequence of events regarding the passengers of the 4 planes and the mysteries surrounding them. All of the passengers, from 4 groups, and 3 locations, ended up in 1 central location, Cleveland International Airport. They had seamlessly & successfully disappeared.

What happened after Cleveland is anyone's guess. All air traffic was closed. If any planes flew, it is doubtful there was recordings of them, especially if they contained the passengers from any of these 4 flights. All that lied ahead of them at this point is their new lives and new identities. And as pointed out earlier, it is possible some real passengers were added to the planes, but this is beyond the scope of my research and beyond the scope of this article.

There is what I believe happened to the passengers. For the first time in 9 years I believe we have come as close as we can without a full fledged honest open inquiry into the crimes of 911 in understanding all the mysteries of the missing passengers & planes. Perhaps you believe the passengers were all real, and then eliminated afterward. Regardless of your viewpoint on this issue, I believe I have outlined the most plausible explanation as to what occurred on 9/11 regarding the 4 planes and passengers. Adapt this scenario as neccessary as it meets your knowledge of the events of 911

User avatar
Posts: 2225
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2008 11:33 pm
Location: Earth

PostMon Aug 09, 2010 7:46 am » by Reinaul

“The important thing is not to stop questioning.”
-Albert Einstein

Be Your Own Messiah

User avatar
Posts: 664
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 9:37 am
Location: Earth...

PostMon Aug 09, 2010 9:38 am » by Astroboy777

"Time for second look"

David Ray Griffin "Time for second look" Hamburg 5/9/09


Note: After the intro in German, 10 mins & 20 secs. The rest of this conference is in English!

Posts: 11
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2007 8:50 am

PostMon Aug 09, 2010 10:17 am » by Adjuk

Hi there,

I think Richard did a great job. Please don't forget to check out the change in the earth's magentic field at the precise moment of first impact (08:46) and, of course, the other thing no one has heard of - Hurricane Erin being closest to New York city (outer bands reached cape cod) at 8am on 9/11/01




9/11 Science Fraud - Court Case:


Cover up and muddle of all lthis:


Get the info cheaply:


Thanks for looking

Andrew Johnson

Posts: 11
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2007 8:50 am

PostMon Aug 09, 2010 10:21 am » by Adjuk

astroboy777 wrote:"Time for second look"

David Ray Griffin "Time for second look" Hamburg 5/9/09

Note: After the intro in German, 10 mins & 20 secs. The rest of this conference is in English!

TIme for a 2nd look at David Ray Griffin:

DRG is not interested in the truth and he won't talk about evidence.

http://www.checktheevidence.com/audio/9 ... p?dir=DRG/

(lower 4 clips)

He seems to think the truth can be established through google searches


I met him briefly in 2006, or rather his wife, when DRG mentioned Space Based Weapons at a talk in London - I asked her to give him a small booklet which included stuff about Disclosure Project and what not.

How come his books get into Barnes and Noble and have sold thousands of copies? (i.e. there is no censorship of them - probably because there is no significantly damaging information in them?)

He thinks we need "global democracy".... hmmmm


Posts: 11
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2007 8:50 am

PostMon Aug 09, 2010 10:24 am » by Adjuk

For those "stuck" with Molten Metal and Thermite, have a look at the special blog I created if you wish:


Posts: 122
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2010 10:28 pm

PostMon Aug 09, 2010 6:00 pm » by Adamo21

jetxvii wrote:ok this thread just officially became retarded. enjoy your here say festivals.

heresay festival? I hear thats going on at the pentagon and has been since 9/11 2001.

This is the scientific evidence of 9/11 review.

Posts: 122
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2010 10:28 pm

PostMon Aug 09, 2010 11:32 pm » by Adamo21

Thats because I have a brain, I can take facts and link them together and THINK for myself, I dont need one person to tell me what to believe.

I really dont know what to tell you, Its not my fault you cant think for yourself.

Your here trying to tell everyone physics is wrong hahaha, and that airliner jets can fly at 500MPH+ at low altitudes while making extreme maneuvers...i mean...hahahahahhaha

Your scared of the truth, and that makes you a coward.

Posts: 122
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2010 10:28 pm

PostMon Aug 09, 2010 11:37 pm » by Adamo21

Oh yea, here is some evidence for you, you're claiming my scientific fact is based on someones word? Your incorrect...

Here you go! http://pilotsfor911truth.org/p4t/Radar_ ... _UA175.pdf

I did some thinking and donated it towards you, obviously you cant research on your own.

User avatar
Posts: 379
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 12:00 pm

PostMon Aug 09, 2010 11:45 pm » by Purebase

purebase wrote:i can give one possible theory as to how those particulat type of jets could have perfomed the physic defying manuvers ...
it might not be right buts itsa good possibility...
i think alot of you have seen the evidence showing that something was attached to the bottom of the plane...there is a good vid depicting the evidence for this...somewher on this site as of recently..
my point is the shape and size of this object shown in clips could be some kind of performance enhancement tech..larger air intake , more fuel that burns at higher combustion rate ....these planes can be altered in many ways to behave better than first designed...i think its more likely they were performance enhanced to do the job
thus still a plane

edited cuz i founf the vid i think

Upload to Disclose.tv

"Anyone who doesn't take truth seriously in small matters cannot be trusted in large ones either".


  • Related topics
    Last post