91% of Canadians Found to Be Toxic

Tue Aug 17, 2010 4:35 am » by **Slith**

When you take test's of a hundred, or even a thousand people. They don't represent the nation as a whole. It's garbage.

I wasn't tested.

Tue Aug 17, 2010 4:39 am » by **whitedeath**

dlslith wrote:When you take test's of a hundred, or even a thousand people. They don't represent the nation as a whole. It's garbage.

I wasn't tested.

Exactly right :flop:

also the way they have phrased the article contradicts themselves in almost every other paragraph.

edit: i knew there were more than a few canadians here so I posted it hoping they would know how accurate this could be.
Aside from that I have no personal opinion as I am woefully under-par with canadian statistics on birth/health matters

Tue Aug 17, 2010 4:44 am » by **whitedeath**

So you're screwed either way then naught ;) but so long as your all healthy that's the main thing

Tue Aug 17, 2010 4:49 am » by **Kidyojimbo**

I think they're pretty right on that one. I've herd from sources that its from decades of birth control filled runoff being dumped into the grate lakes along with the other 250+ chemicals floating around in there. Its nice to think that Canada has a landlocked reserve of fresh water , but what good is it if its so polluted its undrinkable?

Tue Aug 17, 2010 4:51 am » by **lamonema**

Plastics are petrolium based as are many pharacuticals. It's not just the plastics, birth control is pointing dirrectly at causeing cancers and low frertility rates in women in there 20's here in the US. Endometrious is also on the rise like wildfire here in the states.

Tue Aug 17, 2010 12:16 pm » by **Svaha**

I read this :

We have seen this displayed by the Americans and British who under-calculate by even greater factors with their depleted uranium weapons. They allowed their own troops to sleep right next to tanks destroyed by such weapons but thousands of miles away in England radiation levels went up by a factor of 8 or 9 just two weeks after massive bombings in Iraq. There is not enough time to work up a clean Hiroshima equivalent or anything even approaching a quantitative definition of the unfolding disaster in nuclear terms, but whatever size of threat, you can bet your bottom dollar that they will say it’s safe and not a problem. Not a problem that is until you try to have children and you are sterile or your kids are born with cancer or worse.

http://intotheashes.imva.info/breaking- ... tion-alert

Nobody needs birth control in a while.

Tue Aug 17, 2010 12:35 pm » by **Aragajag**

Ah thats the stuff that gets my heart burning. To vaporise so much of the most potent deadly things made. There has been literally thousands of nuke bombs let off between US and Russia alone without bringing into any others.
The French blew many in the pacific. Aust govt was complicit with the UK in exploding many bombs in Australia. Then we had the French letting heaps off in the Pacific with the winds blowing on our land.

Tue Aug 17, 2010 12:36 pm » by **Viggz**

nother bullshit post. All this talk about infertillity. LOL - More people are infirtile kuz guess what!?!

THERES MORE PEOPLE ON EARTH NOW. OMG! Cant believe that simple explination.
No One I know cant have a kid. unless they nuked their bollox with kemo. Fuck man. Dumb shit.

Tue Aug 17, 2010 4:54 pm » by **Illuminated**

chemicals everywhere ...cancers are way way up :dunno: