A fake plane was added for south tower explosion

Super Moderator
User avatar
Posts: 18311
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2010 4:20 am
Location: underneath the circumstances

PostFri Feb 17, 2012 9:37 pm » by The57ironman


Image
.
Canubis wrote:when u die i will be famous..our time then wil dule...EPIC it


.

Initiate
Posts: 689
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 3:19 am

PostSun Feb 19, 2012 8:12 pm » by 7forever


With the clear and overwhelming evidence of drones, it was inevitable that a few eyewitnesses would corroborate the video footage of drones for both towers. Stewart, said he saw something bump into tower 1 before it exploded. That certainly wasn't a plane, because a plane would crash into it, not bump.

He says, "I'm not sure, if it was a ????? (plane). Of course it wasn't a plane, Stewy, and you gave the truth some of the best early testimony that no planes of any kind were seen for either tower because neither had wings. His subconscious gave every word, but 'plane', leaving no doubt that his conscious state prevented that last word. But, we already know those goofy french kids did not film a plane or really any identifiable object which corrorborates Stewart's verified account.

Bryant Gumbel: It's 8:52 here in New York, I'm Bryant Gumbel. We understand that there has been a plane crash on the southern tip of Manhattan. You're looking at the WTC. We understand that a plane has crashed into the WTC. We don't know anything more than that. We don't know if it was a commercial aircraft. We don't know if it was a private aircraft. We have no idea how many were on board, or what the extent of the injuries are right now. We are, uh, we have, I understand, an eyewitness on the phone right now. Sir...

[cuts to commercial briefly]

BG: ...your name?

Stewart: Yeah, my name is Stewart.

BG: Sir, where are you right now?

S: I'm working at a restaurant in Soho. (northeast of the towers)

BG: Alright, so tell us what you saw if you would?

S: I literally, I was waiting a table and I literally saw a -- it seemed to be like the small plane. I just heard a couple of noises. It looked like it bounced off the building and then I heard, uh, I saw a huge like ball of fire on top and then the smoke seemed to simmer down and it just stunned -- you know a lot of smoke was coming out and that's pretty much the extent of what I saw.

BG: A private aircraft?

S: I'm not sure, if it was a -- it just seemed like a smaller plane. I don't think it was anything commercial.

BG: Did you, could you tell us whether or not it was a prop, or a jet .

S: I honestly don't know. It happened too quickly

Image
Image
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3SXIxbhgUDw
http://thedriverkilledkenendy.blogspot.com/

Initiate
Posts: 689
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 3:19 am

PostMon Feb 20, 2012 7:57 pm » by 7forever


HOW TO MOCK A MINORITY OF COWARDLY FOOLS

A small percentage of the population feels the need to defend idiotic government coverups that are laughed at by the masses, which has been proven true by jfk and 911 polls throughout the last four decades.

When the government and media are responsible for these and other outrageous acts of corruption, there is nothing they can do but perpetuate the official lies in hopes of convincing anyone of said propaganda. It soothes them of their darkest fears that humanity may wake up and realize how completely ignorant they are.

Another theory, is the government crapologist gets a certain ego-boost from supporting big government conclusions on such things as 911, and that makes them feel superior over those who actually operate in a real maverick fashion. It gives them a sense of self-importance that they may not have developed through normal processes like the rest of us. Either way, it's pathetic to see how this irrational minority of silly humans attach themselves to goverment theories which cannot, nor will ever be proven.
http://thedriverkilledkenendy.blogspot.com/

Initiate
Posts: 689
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 3:19 am

PostTue Feb 21, 2012 7:06 pm » by 7forever


ABC News Special Report: "Planes crash into World Trade Center"

He never saw a plane like that before, because it wasn't a plane at all. He said it twice, corroborating witnesses like Burnback and Oliver who described a drone. It was identical to what hit the north tower.

Mr Arraki

"Yeah. I--I saw--yeah, I saw the second plane, it go boom. I--I heard, you know. I just wake up my head like that I saw the side, too"

Arraki claims that the plane that hit WTC2 was identical to the plane that hit WTC1. Arraki's description of the first plane is reproduced below:

"I saw it come up from the left, and I saw the plane coming through to the building, go inside, a small plane, no, no, it was plane, you know, like they teach the people to pilot plane, small plane, you know, it was that kind of plane, yes, going into the building, and I never saw that plane before. It's like something, I don't know, it's like they work with the motors, I never saw a plane like that before!"
http://thedriverkilledkenendy.blogspot.com/

Initiate
Posts: 689
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 3:19 am

PostWed Feb 22, 2012 12:18 am » by 7forever


http://digitaljournalist.org/issue0110/images/m04.jpg

"I was underneath it, I was looking at the tower, I had my camera in my hand, I heard the noise, I never saw the airplane." CASE CLOSED.

David, did not hear or see an approaching plane and did not photograph one because there was no plane.

"...Then out of nowhere came this noise. This loud, high-pitched roar that
seemed to come from all over, but from nowhere in particular. AND THE SECOND
TOWER JUST EXPLODED
. It became amazingly obvious to anyone there that what
we all had hoped was a terrible accident was actually an overt act of
hostility. I DIDN'T SEE THE PLANE HIT, ALTHOUGH I WAS LOOKING AT THE TOWER AT
THE TIME
. I have no recollection of pushing the button, hitting the shutter,
making the picture that appeared on Page 2 of the Daily News the next day, a
picture that was taken milliseconds after the second plane hit that tower
..."

Image
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lHrbQ0u3xzk&list=PL1C1F97A9B8B8D8AE&index=25
http://thedriverkilledkenendy.blogspot.com/

Conspirator
Posts: 3729
Joined: Sat Oct 18, 2008 9:57 pm
Location: Scotland

PostWed Feb 22, 2012 12:24 am » by Muchtyman


7forever wrote:http://digitaljournalist.org/issue0110/images/m04.jpg

"I was underneath it, I was looking at the tower, I had my camera in my hand, I heard the noise, I never saw the airplane." CASE CLOSED.

David, did not hear or see an approaching plane and did not photograph one because there was no plane.

"...Then out of nowhere came this noise. This loud, high-pitched roar that
seemed to come from all over, but from nowhere in particular. AND THE SECOND
TOWER JUST EXPLODED
. It became amazingly obvious to anyone there that what
we all had hoped was a terrible accident was actually an overt act of
hostility. I DIDN'T SEE THE PLANE HIT, ALTHOUGH I WAS LOOKING AT THE TOWER AT
THE TIME
. I have no recollection of pushing the button, hitting the shutter,
making the picture that appeared on Page 2 of the Daily News the next day, a
picture that was taken milliseconds after the second plane hit that tower
..."

Image
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lHrbQ0u3xzk&list=PL1C1F97A9B8B8D8AE&index=25



Yeah .............We' ve got it , seriously .

Image

........................................... :cheers:

Now Go Away .

Initiate
Posts: 689
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 3:19 am

PostWed Feb 22, 2012 6:28 pm » by 7forever


9/11 Airplane Photo Gallery - 9-11-2001 - 2nd World Trade Center Attack
The right engine must be in between the first and second slat. The fake image shows the first slat too close to the fuselage, therefore that one fact proves it's fake. The fake engine's in front of the first slat that is too close to the fuselage. This floundering, fake image flop has the flap open on the front of the left wing, not rear where it must be. Yet, another devastating blow to the real planes myth.

This simple fake image raises reasonable doubt about the official south to north flight path of flight 175. New York police officer, L. Perez, took a picture of the towers and this laughable fake was added to it by persons unknown.

Image
Image
http://thedriverkilledkenendy.blogspot.com/

Initiate
User avatar
Posts: 908
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2011 10:51 pm

PostWed Feb 22, 2012 7:02 pm » by Abdul14


When you buy halal products, you are financing inhumaely slaughter and torture of animals

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 3897
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 8:21 pm

PostWed Feb 22, 2012 7:11 pm » by Mrmcnuggets


7forever wrote:9/11 Airplane Photo Gallery - 9-11-2001 - 2nd World Trade Center Attack
The right engine must be in between the first and second slat. The fake image shows the first slat too close to the fuselage, therefore that one fact proves it's fake. The fake engine's in front of the first slat that is too close to the fuselage. This floundering, fake image flop has the flap open on the front of the left wing, not rear where it must be. Yet, another devastating blow to the real planes myth.

This simple fake image raises reasonable doubt about the official south to north flight path of flight 175. New York police officer, L. Perez, took a picture of the towers and this laughable fake was added to it by persons unknown.

Image
Image


mrmcnuggets wrote:Image

Its a rough sad day to be 7forever when both your threads are based on manipulation of viewpoints. :alien51:

Try turning the planes so that they are level with each other next time. :alien51:

the circles are a little hard to see.
- We can see from the "well call them notches" on the back of the wing, that each engine is in fact proportionate to exactly where it is supposed to be. :flop: :alien51:

mrmcnuggets wrote:
7forever wrote:It's called angles and shadows.

Now be truthful here, you aren't really that fucking stupid are you? You only do this for attention, right?


It's called visual facts, ya willing ignorant tool. The right wing is fully exposed and must show space between itself and the fuselage, but it doesn't, proving it a fraud, just like your feeble attempts and stopping reality. :look:


mrmcnuggets wrote:In which picture? I assume the 911?
Well I will go over both since you think you are some sort of genius here.

from the first on the left, with the two in the white background.
The plane on the left is turned more right wing down/left up,
and the picture on the right is left wing down/right up

Though look at that, the engines are still right there, same spots.

Lets go to the 9/11 shall we.
The 9/11 image is not straight bottom towards us, it is more perturbed than that.
Though look at that, the engines are still both right next to the first little air draft mark in the back. :idea:

Just like you trying to say greer shot jfk, with either his left or right hand. From the left/infront of JFK, in the right of his face. :alien51: Right? :lol:
"There he goes. One of God's own prototypes. A high-powered mutant of some kind never even considered for mass production. Too weird to live, and too rare to die. "

I AM an endangered species.


Upload to Disclose.tv


Initiate
Posts: 689
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 3:19 am

PostThu Mar 01, 2012 5:27 pm » by 7forever


muchtyman wrote:
7forever wrote:http://digitaljournalist.org/issue0110/images/m04.jpg

"I was underneath it, I was looking at the tower, I had my camera in my hand, I heard the noise, I never saw the airplane." CASE CLOSED.

David, did not hear or see an approaching plane and did not photograph one because there was no plane.

"...Then out of nowhere came this noise. This loud, high-pitched roar that
seemed to come from all over, but from nowhere in particular. AND THE SECOND
TOWER JUST EXPLODED
. It became amazingly obvious to anyone there that what
we all had hoped was a terrible accident was actually an overt act of
hostility. I DIDN'T SEE THE PLANE HIT, ALTHOUGH I WAS LOOKING AT THE TOWER AT
THE TIME
. I have no recollection of pushing the button, hitting the shutter,
making the picture that appeared on Page 2 of the Daily News the next day, a
picture that was taken milliseconds after the second plane hit that tower
..."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lHrbQ0u3xzk&list=PL1C1F97A9B8B8D8AE&index=25



Yeah .............We' ve got it , seriously .


........................................... :cheers:

Now Go Away .


The truth must go on and on and on. :hiho:
http://thedriverkilledkenendy.blogspot.com/


PreviousNext

  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post
Visit Disclose.tv on Facebook