A fake plane was added for south tower explosion

Initiate
Posts: 691
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 3:19 am

PostSat Mar 31, 2012 1:26 am » by 7forever


700 other architects and engineers, calls for a more thorough investigation into the collapses of the World Trade Center Buildings, three years ago.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ssuAMNas ... ure=relmfu
http://thedriverkilledkenendy.blogspot.com/

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 1383
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 10:10 am
Location: CyberSpace

PostSat Mar 31, 2012 2:23 am » by Ghost32


A Compilation

911: Skyscraper (Never Forget) Edited By Ghost32


:ghost: 32
Image

Initiate
Posts: 691
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 3:19 am

PostSat Mar 31, 2012 7:39 pm » by 7forever


Smersh wrote:
7forever wrote: ... That's reasonable doubt. You have the burden of a proving a lie, not those who point out the many absurdities on 911 that must be ignored to continue on with the silly myth of planes on 911.


But you have already proved yourself, way beyond reasonable doubt, that planes were involved, by you stating that the crew and passengers didn't die, that thousands of eyewitnesses lied and thousands of rolls of film were doctored, so no proof by me or anybody else is required. If this was a court of law with a judge and jury, your case for no planes would stand no chance whatsoever.

So we are still waiting for your extraordinary evidence to prove your extraordinary claims.


But you have already proved yourself, way beyond reasonable doubt, that no planes were involved, by ignoring that an orb wasn't flight 175. If this was a court of law with a judge and jury, your case for planes would stand no chance whatsoever.

I never said anything about the passengers. I never made an extraordinary claim. I showed that an orb aired on 4 news stations and those media lunatics were forced to call it something that it could it never be.
http://thedriverkilledkenendy.blogspot.com/

Initiate
Posts: 691
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 3:19 am

PostSat Mar 31, 2012 10:15 pm » by 7forever


[QUOTE=AD1184;9827770]What do you mean when you say that it casts its own shadow? All objects, I know, cast shadows under light, but where in the segment of footage that you post above is the shadow cast by the object (which you maintain is not an aeroplane) that you keep talking about? Would you post a still with the shadow circled?[/QUOTE]

I already explained it many times and posted the clips. The fake plane images from the west circled the towers which is impossible for a real airplane, and the official flight path had fake 175 flying over the bay in the final 14 seconds. The orb passed east of the north tower in the final few seconds which is why the shadow was cast. Flight 175 could not have left a shadow logically or officially, therefore the official myth of planes is in doubt for that fact and many others.

Image
Image
http://thedriverkilledkenendy.blogspot.com/

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 1219
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 6:25 am

PostSun Apr 01, 2012 12:57 am » by Dagnamski


7forever wrote:Image
Image


The second one is obviously a fake" :nope:
“If at first, the idea is not absurd, then there is no hope for it”

>>>>>Image

Initiate
Posts: 691
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 3:19 am

PostSun Apr 01, 2012 4:40 pm » by 7forever


[quote=skanny;1060730022]Lmao! ... :D

oooh how he luvs his orbs.


its almost as if forever and august are one of the same..... whats the chances folks?


orbs indeed ... lol[/quote]

oooh how skanky loves her cgi with no wings and dots for engines. :look:

it's almost as if skanky and August are one and the same...the chances are good.

fake black/grey plane images indeed... :rtft:

Image
Image
Image
Image
http://thedriverkilledkenendy.blogspot.com/

Initiate
Posts: 691
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 3:19 am

PostSun Apr 01, 2012 5:39 pm » by 7forever


[QUOTE=Patriot911;1061101258] Plane coming in from the west? Nope. More inability for you to think of anything in three dimensions.
[/QUOTE]

The area right of the towers when facing south will always be west and plenty of witnesses said west, over Newark, or from the Jersey side. It all means west, which was not flight 175. You're simply a defeated liar.

CNN.com - Transcripts
This man had a north view of the towers and saw the drone coming from the west.

OK, we actually have an "Eyewitness News" reporter, Dr. J. Atlasberg (ph) who was downtown at the time and he is on the phone with us live.

Dr. J., what can you tell us?

DR. J. ATLASBERG (ph), REPORTER: Hello, Steve.

I'm actually uptown at 86th and Riverside. I can see the World Trade Center from about half the building up to the top. And about five minutes ago, as I was watching the smoke, a small plane -- I did -- it looked like a propeller plane, came in from the west.

And about 20 or 25 stories below the top of the center, disappeared for a second, and then explode behind a water tower, so I couldn't tell whether it hit the building or not. But it was very visible, that a plane had come in at a low altitude and appeared to crash into the World Trade Center.

Image
http://thedriverkilledkenendy.blogspot.com/

Initiate
Posts: 691
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 3:19 am

PostTue Apr 03, 2012 4:53 pm » by 7forever


[quote=skanny;1060734465]evidence ? ... depends what you call "evidence" doesnt it?

using crap fuzzy very low quality heavily distorted badly compressed clips from youtube is not evidence alone now is it?


why dont the no planers source the originals and go buy themselves some copies then make a short video showing the same distortions and artifacts that the no planers claim appear to show cgi / holographic projections of planes.

i have to admit if that happened and it showed the same abnormalities as claimed from the badly distroted clips that are doing the rounds, people would have to rethink their assertions to 9/11.[/quote]

Using crap fuzzy very low quality heavily distorted badly compressed clips from youtube is not evidence of real boeings.

Why don't the plane idiots source the originals and go buy themselves some copies and make a short video showing something different than blurry black blobs with wings and engines displaced that all support cgi planes? Because they know that all plane photographs and videos are easily proven fakes.

You have to admit if that happened and it showed real boeings as you don't claim, then honest thinking folks would have to rethink their conclusions that jackass fakery was used on 911. A real boeing banking left does not move the right engine closer to the fuselage.

Image
Image
http://thedriverkilledkenendy.blogspot.com/

Initiate
Posts: 691
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 3:19 am

PostTue Apr 03, 2012 11:10 pm » by 7forever


[quote=dontdrinkurmilk;1060735809]Yep see they are not exactly the same. If you think that then show an image which has a 767 in the exact same angle. Prove your point properly. I was not lying.[/quote]

The fake image proves it's fake on its own. I just pointed out how it was fake in numerous ways. As I said, the flap is open on the front of the left wing, attached to air. The flap is open on the rear of the left wing on the real plane. THE DEVIL'S IN THE DETAILS.

Image
Image
http://thedriverkilledkenendy.blogspot.com/

Initiate
Posts: 691
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 3:19 am

PostWed Apr 11, 2012 5:51 pm » by 7forever


Controlled Demolition for Dummies

Image
Image
http://thedriverkilledkenendy.blogspot.com/


PreviousNext

  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post
Visit Disclose.tv on Facebook