A fake plane was added for south tower explosion

Initiate
Posts: 680
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 3:19 am

PostSun Apr 15, 2012 3:40 pm » by 7forever


[quote='rsol' pid='241190' dateline='1333985462']
thanks for that but you are wasting your time. in about a week these goons will post yet more of the same "evidence" they posted 6 pages ago as they seem to think quantity beats quality every time.

Ive said it before. no planers are BY DESIGN undermining anything associated with 911 truth.

They have had their bullshit shown to them but they deny ANY data to the contrary.

In fact its almost starting to feel like spam. attention seekers every last one. they are not interested in the truth but prefer outlandish theories because they are simply more fun.
[/quote]

I've said it before, anyone who ignores that an orb bumped into the south tower is BY DESIGN undermining anything associated with 911 truth. The orb was not a plane, could never be a plane, and will never be a plane in any world but fiction. The 911 research community has simply ignored the 'pink elephant in the room', just like they did with jfk, by acting like the driver didn't shoot the President.

It is the common man that keeps these obvious truths from the masses by those few people who actually research these events. They ignore the most conclusive proof in favor of less controversial theories that leave room for debate. Saying the orb is a plane is a simple falsehood, nothing more or less. If all 911 researchers agreed on that simple fact, there'd be a real truth movement that would spider off in so many directions it would make peoples head spin.

They've had their bullshit shown to them but they continue to ignore 4 broadcasts which show an object smaller than a chopper.

Flight 175 never showed up, but an orb coming from the west did, an impossible direction based on reality and the 911 commission. There's nothing complicated about it. The media was forced to call a dot 'the plane' and that's the only truth movement that'll ever catch on with every-day-people. A plane cannot go between two towers before crashing into the back of one of them. The media pretending an unknown flying object was a plane is the most important smoking gun in 911 truth.

Image
[video=youtube;mFPB_NTi2cs]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mFPB_NTi2cs&list=PL1C1F97A9B8B8D8AE&index=97&feature=plpp_video[/video]
http://thedriverkilledkenendy.blogspot.com/

Initiate
Posts: 680
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 3:19 am

PostFri Apr 20, 2012 6:52 pm » by 7forever


[QUOTE=SUNGAZER;89402]That is one of those 'priceless' moments that would NEVER be caught unless someone goes through frame by frame, examining in detail. Not enough people do though.

That's awesome, man! Keep the evidence coming![/QUOTE]

Thanks. It's not that hard if someone wanted tell it like it really happened.

Techmac's digital attempt at computer generated imagery was assinine. Note that it has no right wing and the left wing and engine dislodge right after it gets below the copyright. It convienently zooms in preventing view of the faux image between the towers. WB11 didn't get its first plane morph until 9:27 and the similarities between the two are profound. Only a cgi could have a fake left wing and no right wing.

Image
Image
Image
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl ... _g7X7WFSwg
http://thedriverkilledkenendy.blogspot.com/

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 7596
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 10:34 pm

PostFri Apr 20, 2012 8:30 pm » by Flecktarn


good work :flop: :flop: :flop:
ImageImage

Initiate
Posts: 680
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 3:19 am

PostSun Apr 29, 2012 7:55 pm » by 7forever


THANKS, FLECKTARN. :sunny:
[QUOTE=Ozfactor;861221]Whenever this no plane argument comes up the first question that pops into my mind is.... where are all the people that were on the planes that didn't really hit?[/QUOTE]

Whenever the no plane truth comes up, the first question that pops into my mind is, how did the 65 passengers on flight 175 fit into an orb that was 3-5 feet wide?

Image
Image
Image
http://thedriverkilledkenendy.blogspot.com/

Initiate
Posts: 680
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 3:19 am

PostSat May 05, 2012 11:01 pm » by 7forever


[QUOTE=The Fez;13181344]Lol, I don't have to do any of that. The rest of us, with our FUC*ING EYES, can watch anywhere between 46 and several hundred amateur videos of a plane flying into the south tower and then trust our powers of perception. We can read documents that chart the activity of the 9/11 hijackers that give them the motivation, the means, and the know-how to pull off their act of terror.

But let's examine what you believe: "Nothing on TV is real". You cannot trust any visual image at all to convey any real thing. "Witness testimony is not real". The legitimate claims of an individual or group of individuals are totally spurious and entirely falsifiable.

Firstly, you have yet to explain how someone or some organization integrated a plane in tens of dozens of videos (sometimes within seconds during a live-broadcast) and then somehow tampered with and manipulate all the home-movies made by amateur videographers on 9/11. Why is it that out of so many honest people shooting the events on that day, not one of them uploaded a video onto the internet with a building exploding in the absence of a plane collision, and not a single person has reported that a plane has been added to their footage. Explain that. And explain to me further how several million people living in New York, watching the events unfold in person, who saw a plane fly into the South tower, are spurious witnesses. There is a threshold of legitimacy for eye witnesses. If enough people report seeing the same thing (in this case millions), there is no room skepticism. The likelihood that millions of people saw a real plane is greater than the likelihood that they all imagined it.

Furthermore, eye-witness testimony is still a legitimate source of evidence in court. If you assert that nothing you experience in person, and for real, can be legitimate or relied upon as credible, then you essentially destroy the concept of phenomenlogy, memory, law and order (because even victims are recalling events wrongly! Was their dad really stabbed in from them? Was the coroner actually examining a body?). You question reality itself. Operating from such a basis, you have no reason to trust anything, not even your Truther sources. How do you know that your truther sources weren't fabricated, or that the authors of the site isn't perpetrating some kind of psy-op to distract Truthers from more important veins of research. How can you be sure that the 'evidence' these Truther sites are providing hasn't been invented by an overzealous individual or a government agent? You very ability to trust INFORMATION, at all, is compromised. Your ability to ARGUE is compromised. Your ability to PERCEIVE is compromised. At the end of the day, you'll find that you've totally rejected reality to suit the one outlandish notion that no plane flew in the World Trade Centers. Is that really worth destroying every vestige of trust in the real world?

If you can't even bother yourself to address and explain my questions above (they are all legitimate questions), and you dodge aggressively like you normally do, I might have to reconsider whether or not you should continue posting in the Nuthouse. Your normal behavior is fairly harmless, but alleging that no one died on planes during 9/11 is so highly offensive that it stresses my tolerance. You represent a fringe group within a fringe group. You get one more post on this issue, and that's it. I will not allow you to continue spreading lies so that you can feed your delusion.

In case any of you were wondering: None of you need to prove that the planes actually existed on 9/11. That he's actually gotten any of us to question this fact is highly disturbing.[/QUOTE]


Lol, you can't do any of that. The rest of normal humanity can watch anywhere between 46 and several hundred amateur videos of fake blobs flying into the south tower and trust the power of reality and common sense.

But let's examine what you believe: "Everything on TV is real". You cannot trust all visual images to conclude that a image is real, not fake. Eyewitness testimony is real and supported something, not plane circling the south tower.

Firstly, you have yet to explain how obviously faked videos are somehow real when they are laughable on every level. YOU NOR ANYONE can prove a negative. Why is it that out of so many honest people shooting the events on that day, that none of them uploaded a video that depicted a real boeing 767? Explain that. And explain how an orb coming from the west could be flight 175 when it was about 3-5 feet? Eyewitness testimony has put more innocent people behind bars than any other type of evidence. If enough people report seeing the same thing that is corroborated by video, there is no room for debate. Witnessses saw the orb cirlce around and called it a small plane, drone, and some laughed at it. NO PERSON SAW A REAL PLANE HIT EITHER TOWER ON 911. Millions of people saw fake plane images on TV.

Furthermore, eyewitness testimony is a legitimate source of evidence if other evidence can corroborate it. The orb cirlced around and nothing else can withstand scrutiny. You don't question fiction itself. Operating from such a basis, you have no reason to question anything, not even your fake media sources. You know now that your tv sources were fabricated. You can be sure that the 'evidence' provided by government and the media was incorrect because it was visibly fake. Your willingness to trust false INFORMATION is exposed. Your ability to DENY is all you got. Your ability accept fiction over fact is your crutch. At the end of the day, you'll find that you've totally rejected reality to suit the outlandish notion that real planes flew into the World Trade Center Towers. It's not worth accepting fiction because it's politically incorrect.

In case any of you were wondering: No person or group can prove that real planes impacted either tower because no photographic or video evidence of REAL planes doing so exists.
http://thedriverkilledkenendy.blogspot.com/

Initiate
Posts: 680
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 3:19 am

PostTue May 08, 2012 6:27 pm » by 7forever


[QUOTE=Plainview;13682483]An ex-girlfriend's brother is a NYC Cop. He worked the financial district when the attacks happened. He was there. He saw both planes hit.[/QUOTE]

Eyewitness testimony is the most unreliable evidence and has put more innocent people behind bars than any other. I already explained it many times and posted the clips. The fake plane images from the west circled the towers which is impossible for a real airplane, and the official flight path had fake 175 flying over the bay in the final 14 seconds. The orb passed east of the north tower in the final few seconds which is why the shadow was cast. Flight 175 could not have left a shadow logically or officially, therefore the official myth of planes is in doubt for that fact and many others. The shadow is so distinct because the orb literally moved in between the towers, turning right and finally left across the rear of tower 2.

Image
Image
Image
http://thedriverkilledkenendy.blogspot.com/

Initiate
Posts: 680
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 3:19 am

PostSat May 12, 2012 9:50 pm » by 7forever


[QUOTE=bobster;1060821050] you can clearly see on that poorly rendered gif that its a plane[/QUOTE]

You can clearly see that I took a real picture of a distant plane and it looks real because it is. The black blob in Cloud's video is the only thing that's fake. It's black with no tail section, no wings, no fuselage, nothing but jackass fakery. The light poles render perfect silver with a black blob just west.:D

Image
Image
Image
Image
http://thedriverkilledkenendy.blogspot.com/

Conspirator
Posts: 2514
Joined: Mon May 10, 2010 4:02 pm

PostMon May 14, 2012 1:54 am » by Punjedi


Oh boy you again. So, since your Kennedy post was a yawner you came into this realm eh? Bad move.

First off, try using footage that is a little bit more descriptive. Maybe, a video that shows various angles of the same event yes? Hmmmm like, I dunno...

This one...


Upload to Disclose.tv

Image
Nihil Sine Fide!

Conspirator
Posts: 2514
Joined: Mon May 10, 2010 4:02 pm

PostMon May 14, 2012 2:09 am » by Punjedi


You folks that come in here with your "fake plane" bs gets really old. Poison someone else's well and leave this one alone. It is OBVIOUS that planes hit the towers, the argument is what actually turned them to dust. Not if planes actually hit.

Don't take something that requires a fair bit of intelligence to comprehend its scope and scale and try to apply your idiot wrapper to it. It won't work.


I know you are gonna post your usual over - used laughing gifs to retort, and keep posting grainy ass photos and videos that you couldn't determine crap from as your proof.

meanwhile I and the rest of us will continue to use our brains and facts to find what really happened, and not rely on 1 or 2 very specific videos when there are very many shots to use as an investigatory aid.

It would take nothing, if they can dust the towers, to vaporize thin aluminum and some heavy parts. Think about all the equipment in the top towers, the restaurants and all their gear , the vaults for the banks, the tons and tons of heavy machinery, pumps, all that dustified. Easily could have done that to the impacting planes, especially if they were modified in an way.

But to say that it was "cgi" is ridiculous and would have been FAR FAR more difficult to pass on a public with so many video cameras pointing at the towers.

Now you might come back with the infamous "disappearing nose cone" also in low res shots. Well there are high res shots of the same event at different angles, and yes you do see a punch through, and guess what, no blackout! in the video either.... wanna see?

Here. let me help you since you don't seem to want to use anything but 1 or 2 pieces of a very large puzzle.


Upload to Disclose.tv

Image
Nihil Sine Fide!

Super Moderator
User avatar
Posts: 16610
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2010 4:20 am
Location: ...between a rock and a hard place...

PostMon May 14, 2012 2:29 am » by The57ironman


nice of you to drop in and give your perspective....... :mrcool:


...you bastard......lol
.


...i'm a recovering vegetarian......Image

.


PreviousNext

  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post
Visit Disclose.tv on Facebook