A fake plane was added for south tower explosion

Initiate
Posts: 689
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 3:19 am

PostMon Sep 02, 2013 9:38 pm » by 7forever


This spooked woman was making excuses for why the the ball looked like a ball. It wasn't further out. She was standing in the same place, at the same distance, and even used the word 'golfball'. JERSEY SIDE=NOT 175.

As this terrified woman was running pell-mell away from the first collapsing tower — her hair, coat and feet on fire — Ms. Patricia Ondrovic witnessed vehicles parked along the street spontaneously erupt into flames. She even witnessed an aircraft disappear while in flight: “I saw something in the sky, it was a plane, but it was way out. It looked like it was over Jersey or something, then it wasn’t there anymore. I saw a small fireball, and it was gone. I saw two other planes. One came in one way, and the other came in the other way, and there was a plane in the middle that was way far off in the distance. Then the plane in the middle just disappeared into a little fire ball. It looked like the size of a golf ball from where I could see it. And the other two planes veered off into opposite directions. I just kept on running north.” And she’s got a lot more to say. - See more at:

Witnesses Saw People ?Vaporized? on 9/11 « Just Wondering ? Alternative News and Opinions

Image

Something, is definitely not a plane
http://thedriverkilledkenendy.blogspot.com/

Super Moderator
User avatar
Posts: 18168
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2010 4:20 am
Location: underneath the circumstances

PostMon Sep 02, 2013 11:54 pm » by The57ironman


7forever wrote:
Something, is definitely not a plane

.


.......surely, you could have found a grainier image.. :mrcool:




.
.

....remember....the authorities are working hard to keep you feeling helpless...

.

Initiate
Posts: 689
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 3:19 am

PostTue Sep 03, 2013 4:44 am » by 7forever


Here's the original attempt by a troll to align the fake image to reality. He greatly reduced the size of the blob to hide that the real plane was angled more to the right. Note, that he reversed the image. Deception is all the liars have against obvious proof such as this.

Image
Image
Image
http://thedriverkilledkenendy.blogspot.com/

Super Moderator
User avatar
Posts: 18870
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 9:22 pm
Location: In your grill

PostTue Sep 03, 2013 4:58 am » by Slith


How did Air Canada come into this?
Image

Canubis wrote:
i consume more hard liquor a night then all dtv together...

yet i am so god dam smart....and own this shit in my world..

Initiate
Posts: 689
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 3:19 am

PostTue Sep 03, 2013 5:43 am » by 7forever


Slith wrote:How did Air Canada come into this?


That was the first attempt to align the fake image to a real plane.

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthre ... 61&page=16
http://thedriverkilledkenendy.blogspot.com/

Initiate
Posts: 689
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 3:19 am

PostTue Sep 03, 2013 5:28 pm » by 7forever


Watch it closely. It appears out of thin air, then rises up. It was a fake image that was added before Clifton Cloud went on the news that evening. Increase your screen size to 400% and notice that it appears right of the light pole, never coming from left of it.

"I just caught the second explosion on videotape...No, a bomb, I saw it, no plane hit nothin', the building exploded from the other tower floors down." NIST FOIA: Clifton Cloud Clips 1-3 (WTC2 Plane Impact, 9:03am) - YouTube

Image
http://thedriverkilledkenendy.blogspot.com/

Initiate
Posts: 689
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 3:19 am

PostSun Sep 15, 2013 11:28 pm » by 7forever


http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=183361&page=16

The right angle of Gamtard's model matches closely to the real plane, but fails completely against the straighter angle of the fake image and real boeing.

Image
Image
Image
http://thedriverkilledkenendy.blogspot.com/

Initiate
Posts: 689
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 3:19 am

PostWed Sep 18, 2013 9:12 pm » by 7forever


What we're looking at here are zoomed images. They all must show color detail whether in direct sunlight or not. Color detail is also visible at sunset. The fake 911 image doesn't even rise to the level of a poorly done cgi.

Image
Image
Image
Image
http://thedriverkilledkenendy.blogspot.com/

Initiate
Posts: 689
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 3:19 am

PostFri Sep 20, 2013 7:55 pm » by 7forever


New Poll Finds Most Americans Open to Alternative 9/11 Theories

http://rethink911.org/news/new-poll-finds-most-americans-open-to-alternative-911-theories/#pagecontent

FBI calls half of populace with 9/11 doubts potential terrorists

http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/358624
http://thedriverkilledkenendy.blogspot.com/

Conspirator
Posts: 1544
Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 7:18 pm

PostSat Sep 21, 2013 1:32 am » by Doogle


7forever wrote:What we're looking at here are zoomed images. They all must show color detail whether in direct sunlight or not. Color detail is also visible at sunset. The fake 911 image doesn't even rise to the level of a poorly done cgi.

Image
Image
Image
Image


I posted a while back that the images of the plane could easily be explained as a poor depiction of the same plane but from a different angle - an angle that isn't easily seen due to the shit image quality. The comment is no more, it is demised. Must have been hoovered up into the ether during the great DTV crash.
My comment still stands. But it's a moot point any way.

7. You ain't letting go of that bone are you. You obviously "just know".

Here's a whole bag of bones for you, but you'll have to share them with me for now.

http://www.mediafire.com/download/p8kdj ... _full.zip_

Never mind the detractors. If you know your subject well and can back it up, then they will shut up eventually, but the side effect of that is they will try different tactics.


PreviousNext

  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post
Visit Disclose.tv on Facebook