Absolute Proof, Moonwalk Was Faked

Fri Dec 14, 2012 4:43 am » by **Kaarmaa**

I thought this was about Michael Jackson....

Fri Dec 14, 2012 5:37 am » by **The57ironman**

Chaindrive wrote:The "only" way to really know if it was achieved as theyve been stating all these years, but first, one will have to get through that blast furnace called the Van Allen Belts is to go to the moon and be in the physical presences of "ALL" 6 landing sites..

But to get there youll have to have the money resources of the 6 riches men on the entire planet to make it work... cause if it IS been a hoax and the money resources are coming from outside, those of the elite will stop at nothing to prevent it and the money WILL stop dead in its tracks.

Simple...... isnt it. *shrug*

.

.....what..?... :headscratch:

.

Fri Dec 14, 2012 6:39 am » by **Chaindrive**

The57ironman wrote:
Chaindrive wrote:The "only" way to really know if it was achieved as theyve been stating all these years, but first, one will have to get through that blast furnace called the Van Allen Belts is to go to the moon and be in the physical presences of "ALL" 6 landing sites..

But to get there youll have to have the money resources of the 6 riches men on the entire planet to make it work... cause if it IS been a hoax and the money resources are coming from outside, those of the elite will stop at nothing to prevent it and the money WILL stop dead in its tracks.

Simple...... isnt it. *shrug*

.

.....what..?...

.

1. seeing IS believing

2. Van Allen Belts are bad

3. Not rich, not going anywhere

Fri Dec 14, 2012 10:57 am » by **mediasorcery**

would someone please just show me one hi resolution close up image of the moon comparable to the pics of mars or other planets, im yet to find one?

if you have any doubts about the moon landing, your obviously a terrorist, hehehe.

Fri Dec 14, 2012 12:38 pm » by **Toxic32**

Iwanci wrote:toxic, just clarifying, to whom are you referring ?

Not you of course. You must have posted your comment as I was writing mine. Any way just for clarification I will post the link which shows the Apollo 11 landing site along with other moon landing sites.

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LRO/news/apollo-11.html

Fri Dec 14, 2012 4:45 pm » by **Cognoscenti**

Cia is right on. The speed of acceleration due to the force of gravity varies proportionally to the size of the mass which genertes it. There was also a video made of one of the astronauts simultaneously dropping a hammer and an feather on the moon and seeing them strike the surface at the same time.

Fri Dec 14, 2012 4:49 pm » by **Kinninigan**

moon landing hoax filmed by walt disney exposed new top secret evidence

Upload to Disclose.tv

Fri Dec 14, 2012 4:58 pm » by **Phoenix rising**

check this one out, its just looks so fake

Upload to Disclose.tv

Sat Dec 15, 2012 2:50 am » by **Harbin**

This video is NOT a debunker, it's quite canonical, however watch the last lunar module lift off the moon..

How did the camera pan up to film the ascending module, further how was the film retrieved from the camera ?

Was it a remote controlled live feed ?

Upload to Disclose.tv

Sat Dec 15, 2012 6:58 am » by **Eldorado**

This Brilliant Textbook Theorist has forgotten to take into effect the actual weight of the space suits and the Personal Life Support Systems of the Apollo Missions.......

This retard claims it didnt happen because the footprints on the moon are too deep for a 1/6th gravity environment....

well add the factors up genius.........200 lb space suit......... + Neil Armstrong's weight...... 170 lbs.....

that's 370 earth pounds.........divided by six.......roughly 61 lbs.........in soft sandy silty moon soil would easily imprint the pictured footprint, as deep as it should have been......especially with the added bounce of the astronaut in the environment during the walks......

Trying to look wise.......???

Anyone can grow a fucking beard........