All Hell Loose - Massive Rios in Iran!

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 1247
Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 11:40 pm

You might like:

PostMon Jun 15, 2009 10:45 pm » by Ph0enix


Hmmm. With most of the armed forces deployed elsewhere there wouldn't be much of a military response would there?

But how do you convince other countries to do that? Send troops here that is? Putting your troops on american soil if the people of the US haven't agreed to it.............will get your army's ass kicked easily. We are a nation built from rebellion. Even dictatorships can't rid themselves of armed rebels so no country is going to send troops here because Iraq wouldn't be shit compared to what they would go through here.
<< You got that right! :flop: They wouldn't know who's worse, the rednecks, the many variety of gangbangers, the neo nazis and skinheads, the malitias, every idiot who ever wanted to be rambo and has a friend with some firepower, or the pissed off postal workers going postal on their asses. Yes, it would get mid-evil over here. Not a good idea... Yammamoto wrote a report about it...

to be honest I think this is more western media hype then anything else. It does not matter who is president of Iran, like it does not matter who is president of America. They are still controlled by higher people. The opponent was obviously back up by the CIA or something, and the western media tried to play him up like the next Obama in Iran. Then Obama when and gave a speech right before the elections in the area, I dont think this was coincidence. This is all the looks of a big PSY-OP being pushed out through the media, as normal standard procedure...
so do you guys crush the meth into the heroine and then mix it with the weed and the crack or how does your obviously drug enduced state come to be? Stop calling everything a psy-op. Of course we would back a candidate that we felt had America's best interests at heart. Thats not conspiratory, thats logical (ask Spock). We have, will, and should ALWAYS back potential leaders and regimes that are beneficial to a more peaceful world or at least a better relationship between that country and ourselves. The last leader was/is ready to nuke us, the new leader wants peace.... WHY WOULDN'T WE BACK THE NEW LEADER!!!!!!!!!!! :bang; :bang; :bang; :roll:
jetxvii wrote:I am speechless...... I had no Idea it was this big.

I have no words

Initiate
User avatar
Posts: 561
Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2008 7:00 am

PostTue Jun 16, 2009 9:41 pm » by Stone069


drextin wrote:Well stone to the contrary Iran has always been very passionate about its political machine. The riots are right in line with what you would expect from them. The Ayatollah knows this since he was there for the student uprisings in the 70s that made Iran the Islamic nation it is now.

Considering Obama has been at odds with Israel because he won't back any of their plans to attack Iran............I think its safe to say we are not trying to go to war with them at the moment.............but moments change it just hasn't gotten there yet.



I was thinking more long term not immediate. It is just hard to get over :bullshit: Bush being in office. I guess my trigger finger got itchy. :ohno: :nails: :shooting:
Image

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 3749
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 5:17 pm

PostTue Jun 16, 2009 10:02 pm » by Mep630


I don't think the people could do shit in Iran, like any country it has a single ruler, and as such if it needs to be it will become a monarchy if it's power is contested.

Obviously it would be good for America's Army if Iran had an uprising since they want to attack them.

I agree with Drextin that our army is worn out bad. And I think our forces think a shift to more robotic forces can and might solve this, but honestly I think it is only a matter of time before thee is a serious counter to all these drones and that would cripple America's forces.

We are heavy relied upon satellites for war, and we have spent a lot of $$ on the most expensive big war projects over the last years. When it is proven that cheap, easily produced equipment is what wins wars. Like the russian Rkg-3.

Also the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are not against major military forces. Russia and China have some seriously tough troops. Russians soldiers can be killed in training, and they are 'fresh' for a war. I think our forces would crumble in a major war with these countries. And I think that russia and china 1st moves will be to take out all american satalites.

The next war is beyond what any military person can imagine. And as in history's past we will fight "the-last-war" mentality and this leave a lot of room for error and miscalculations like when Napoleon's armies first started attacking with their new tactics.
[youtube]VSEchNZkIT8#![/youtube]

Previous
  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

We are listed at the www.topparanormalsites.com website. Click here to vote for us.. Thank you :-)