By J. Grant Swank, Jr.
Sep 25, 2006
Allah is Satan. Allah is not “just another god.” Allah is Lucifer of the Bible.
Allah has requested all that Satan requested per the biblical data. Allah is the antithesis of the loving deity of the Bible.
Therefore, Islam is the antithesis of Judeo-Christianity.
One cannot locate in Islam’s Koran or any non-Koran Islamic traditions anything close to the Good Samaritan, I Corinthians 13’s Love Chapter, a Redeemer who sacrifices His holy life in order for repentant souls to come to life, a heavenly holiness in peace awaiting the Redeemer’s grace children.
Islam only knows killing and maiming, the follow through to The Fall brought about by Satan-Serpent in the Garden of Eden. Muslims are even content killing one another and grooming their children for suicide, so much is the satanic death ingrained into their lifestyles.
Islam is “death and destruction,” to use President Bush’s expression. That is the direct opposite of the Christian’s hope of life and fulfillment.
In addition, Islam abhors females, stating they are conceived with ten curses. Curses are defined as displaying one’s genitals in public. One curse is removed if the female marries.
Islamic females are imprisoned by male dominance in that females must get permission from their males to leave the dwelling. They cannot pursue a vocation, education or their own independence. They cannot marry a non-Muslim. They cannot leave that Islamic cult for another spiritual preference.
Islamic females are garbed from head to toe.
They are beaten at the whim of their male masters.
They must share Islamic marriage with other wives, each male permitted to marry four women.
Then each Islamic male is permitted to have “temporary wives” of ten minutes each. That is to then permit the lustful Muslim the allowance of having sex with a prostitute but for ten minutes calling her his “wife.”
The Islamic males also can have “wives” who are their sex slaves, such wives living with their parents, receiving no payment from their “husbands” and always attentive to the “husbands’” sexual desires.
Therefore, Islamic males can have much sex, even looking down upon non-Muslim females who are not fully garbed, raping them by referring to them as “harlots” asking for rape because they are not fully garbed.
Christ, in contrast, lifted womanhood in a time when women were considered less than men. Christ met the Samaritan woman at Jacob’s well. Samaritans were considered half-breeds by Jews. Jews did not speak to Samaritans let along a Samaritan woman. But Christ did speak to her, saved her soul and gave her hope.
The first to witness the resurrected Christ was a woman. Women as well as men were blessed by the Holy Spirit’s baptism in the Upper Room on the Day of Pentecost. In the New Testament Church there were not only prophets giving for the gospel, but also prophetesses - women preaching the good news of personal salvation in Christ.
There are countless more comparisons between Islam and Judeo-Christianity, between the bloody Koran and the Bible, but these few suffice in this brief study.
Copyright by J. Grant Swank, Jr.
1. Cane being exhiled and somehow finding someone to marry and have kids with, but wait, I thought adam and eve where the only ones alive at that time, but I suppose you can't ask that question in church, huh.
2. In the portion where it says this person begot this person, there are references of men having more than one wife. And lets not forget that Abraham slept with a slave girl, then threw her and the baby into the desert like animals to die.
3. Oh and was it Lot whose daughters got him drunk and raped him while he slept.
Need I go on..
Why don't you try researching things yourself before trying to attack things you don't understand. All religions have been corrupted by man! 'nuff said.
- ID: 37e4d51b22be
govtslave wrote:Dude, I don't agree with the way Muslims treat women but, I would suggest that you study the history of women in the Bible. Starting with Genesis.......Then look at what women are doing to men in modern family courts. Do you see any relationship there?
That is a good point.
NOT ALL, but there is alot of dumb Bimbos
but then again there is alot of Grey Haired old men in Politics singing laws to murder young soldiers..
Fucking greedy biatches, its the ones that take someone to court that you have to watch out for, even if it is only for say Child support, custody, divorce.... that is why I don't want to get married, "Honey I love you soo much"..... "I want a divorce".... "I know you make 2 times as much as me but I want half because I had to put up with you"
I feel sorry for Tiger, because he wanted to get Willy Wonka and his chocolate factory dipped, he is now going to have to pay 300 Million to a Woman that was supposed to love him...
I am sorry if you love someone, then fall out of love with them, you don't take half of anything if you didn't buy it yourself or contribute to it...
I could go on all day about this subject, but it's a disgrace to "Human Kind" when Women are given so much power, and I don't mean to offend anyone, but if you were put in a situation listed above you would understand what I mean...
same goes for Men.......... and Shemales...or as we in the BIZ call them "SHIMS"
August 10, 2009
BUSH UNLEASHED BIBLICAL BABBLE ON CHIRAC
James A. Haught, Secular Humanism - President George W. Bush told French President Jacques Chirac in early 2003 that Iraq must be invaded to thwart Gog and Magog, the Bible's satanic agents of the Apocalypse. . .
Now out of office, Chirac recounts that the American leader appealed to their "common faith" (Christianity) and told him: "Gog and Magog are at work in the Middle East. . . The biblical prophecies are being fulfilled. . . This confrontation is willed by God, who wants to use this conflict to erase his people's enemies before a New Age begins."
This bizarre episode occurred while the White House was assembling its "coalition of the willing" to unleash the Iraq invasion. Chirac says he was boggled by Bush's call and "wondered how someone could be so superficial and fanatical in their beliefs."
After the 2003 call, the puzzled French leader didn't comply with Bush's request. Instead, his staff asked Thomas Romer, a theologian at the University of Lausanne, to analyze the weird appeal. Dr. Romer explained that the Old Testament book of Ezekiel contains two chapters in which God rages against Gog and Magog, sinister and mysterious forces menacing Israel. Jehovah vows to smite them savagely, to "turn thee back, and put hooks into thy jaws," and slaughter them ruthlessly. In the New Testament, the mystical book of Revelation envisions Gog and Magog gathering nations for battle, "and fire came down from God out of heaven, and devoured them.". . .
Subsequently, ex-President Chirac confirmed the nutty event in a long interview with French journalist Jean-Claude Maurice. . .
Oddly, mainstream media are ignoring this alarming revelation that Bush may have been half-cracked when he started his Iraq war. My own paper, The Charleston Gazette in West Virginia, is the only U.S. newspaper to report it so far. Canada's Toronto Star recounted the story, calling it a "stranger-than-fiction disclosure . . . which suggests that apocalyptic fervor may have held sway within the walls of the White House." Fortunately, online commentary sites are spreading the news, filling the press void.
The French revelation jibes with other known aspects of Bush's renowned evangelical certitude. For example, a few months after his phone call to Chirac, Bush attended a 2003 summit in Egypt. The Palestinian foreign minister later said the American president told him he was "on a mission from God" to defeat Iraq. At that time, the White House called this claim "absurd."
Recently, GQ magazine revealed that former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld attached warlike Bible verses and Iraq battle photos to war reports he hand-delivered to Bush. One declared: "Put on the full armor of God, so that when the day of evil comes, you may be able to stand your ground."
It's awkward to say openly, but now-departed President Bush is a religious crackpot, an ex-drunk of small intellect who "got saved." He never should have been entrusted with the power to start wars.
For six years, Americans really haven't known why he launched the unnecessary Iraq attack. Official pretexts turned out to be baseless. Iraq had no weapons of mass destruction after all, and wasn't in league with terrorists, as the White House alleged. Collapse of his asserted reasons led to speculation about hidden motives: Was the invasion loosed to gain control of Iraq's oil-or to protect Israel-or to complete Bush's father's vendetta against the late dictator Saddam Hussein? Nobody ever found an answer.
- Related topics
- Last post
- Going to the bathroom in the name of Allah Most High
1, 2by Thewindycity » Sat Nov 07, 2009 6:20 pm
- 14 Replies
- 505 Views
- Last post by TheDuck
Sat Nov 07, 2009 7:27 pm
- Going to the bathroom in the name of Allah Most High