AN APPEAL TO HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 8117
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 9:08 am
Location: Next door

PostTue Dec 18, 2012 9:07 am » by Malogg


The following is an extract from an email >>>

One brave Englishman battling the beast big-time – respect to Michael Murrin, please help circulate. Belinda


NEWS RELEASE

EMBARGO 15.00 (GMT) MONDAY 17th DEC:



PAEDOPHILES IN POWER

AN APPEAL TO

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN




“There also seems to have been significant subversion by MI5 of the role of the police as a law enforcement agency.”



“Has there been an ongoing subversion of our democracy by rogue elements within the security service establishment? Whilst protecting us from our enemies beyond these shores is the security apparatus harbouring the enemy within? Is democracy being subverted with the intention that the people of this country be firmly tied to the yoke of totalitarianism?”



“The response of the executive is a mix of denial, collusion and complicity.”







LETTER TO THE PRIME MINISTER



Could it be that there is, in your own mind, one rule for Ivan and another for Tom, Dick and Harry? Do you consider the children of the “plebs” to be nothing more than the disposable playthings of the political and social elite? Is this why you are so dismissive of matters related to the allegations of child sexual abuse involving your political and social peers? Whatever the answers are to these questions your failure to properly respond to my correspondence displays, from my perspective, a callous indifference to the plight of the many victims of child sexual abuse.





None of you can walk past this issue, turn a blind eye to it, and retain your claim to be a part of humanity. The fact that so many of you have done so, for so many decades, is a fact that should compel the most hardened cynics among you to hang their heads in shame.





LETTER TO LORD JUSTICE MUMMER



Let me take the gloss off that and spell out to you exactly what that means: You are complicit in the rape and buggery of infants, children and adolescents. If you have, or have had reason to suspect that such evil is/has been deliberately perpetrated and/or concealed by the security establishment which you oversee, and you have failed to act to prevent/investigate it, then your failure to act adds to the magnitude of your complicity.





LETTER TO MR BERNARD HOGAN-HOWE

COMMISSIONER – METROPOLITAN POLICE



I will also send through to Mr Spindler details of information I received during my investigation undertaken from 1982 – 1992. Included are allegations of:



1. Intervention by senior politicians in investigations involving political corruption.

The investigations were closed down on the direct instructions of the politicians

named. The investigations were by various government agencies, including the

police.





2. The corrupt receipt of political donations KNOWN by the recipients to have

originated from the dealing of class A drugs.



3. The payment of politicians for changes in existing government legislation.



4. The corruption of ministerial office.



5. A connection between Peter Righton and my own investigation during the 1980’s,

and a further connection with MI5.







It is fashionable to consider the police force to be institutionally corrupt. I know from personal experience that this is NOT the case. I have advised, and will continue to advise, anyone who contacts me with information that they should

TRUST THE POLICE and provide their co-operation at all times.











MICHAEL .H. MURRIN

21 GOODWOOD AVENUE. PRESTON. PR2 9TZ

TELE: 0795 – 142 – 6617

murrin@hotmail.co.uk





Her Majesty The Queen.

Buckingham Palace,

London,

SW1A 1AA. 15th December 2012.





Madam,



RE: SUSPECTED USE OF PAEDOPHILIA BY THE BRITISH SECURITY SERVICES TO

BLACKMAIL AND CONTROL PUBLIC FIGURES IN THE UNITED KINGDOM.



It is after much thought and with considerable trepidation that I write this letter to you. I write now because I have exhausted every other avenue through which I can raise my concerns. Every approach I have made to the statutory authorities, and elected officials, has been met with stonewalling and a failure to properly respond to my correspondence. I have sought to secure a proper investigation by the statutory authorities of the matters I am raising. It is, in effect, being made clear to me that no such investigation will be allowed to proceed.



During 1982 I established a Ratepayers Association in Preston. In my capacity as chairman of that association allegations of corruption within the council were brought to my attention. I did an analysis of the information I had received and concluded that behind the allegations there was serious criminal activity centred on the bribery of public officials and elected politicians, illegal sexual activity probably involving blackmail, and the trafficking of prohibited drugs. I initiated an investigation into the allegations being made and my analysis of the information proved to be totally correct. The investigation I ran started in Preston but spread to other regions and touched on national politics. The full extent of my investigations, and findings, has never been made public. As a result of the investigations centred on Preston there were three key prosecutions leading to convictions, they were:



1. The conviction of a prominent local/national businessman for the rape of an

underage girl.



2. The conviction of his business associate for the serial rape of children.



3. The conviction of another of his business associates on nine charges of laundering

money on behalf of a dealer in class A drugs.







During the investigation (1984-85) I was offered a copy of the membership list of the Paedophile Information Exchange. The asking price was £10,000, a sum of money which was not available to me at the time. As a “taster” I was given two names of individuals who were alleged to be on that list. One was a senior Labour politician who is still alive but retired, the other was Jimmy Savile. On October 7th I wrote to Mr Bernard Hogan-Howe, Commissioner – Metropolitan Police. I have had cause to write to Mr Hogan-Howe since and on every occasion I have received a proper acknowledgement of the correspondence. I have also written to Lord Patten, he has failed to acknowledge my correspondence or address the serious matters they raise. I have contacted my MP, Ben Wallace, but he is not practically supportive. On October 21st I wrote to the Prime Minister, I have had a standard letter acknowledging receipt of my letter. On December 3rd I received an email from Marples Demster, Library and Arts Policy Officer, from the Ministerial Support Team. This was a one page letter which failed to address ANY of the points put to the Prime Minister. Copies of the correspondence are attached.



Once the Savile revelations were in the public domain I started to analyse the information as I did in the early 1980’s when I received the information which led to the convictions mentioned above. One point that concerned me was the alleged involvement of the security services in the use of paedophilia for the purposes of blackmail. There were very serious allegations which centred on the Knicora Boys school in Northern Ireland. Eventually, I formulated a working hypothesis in an effort to make some rational judgements as to the veracity of these reports. On October 12th I wrote to Mr Hogan-Howe explaining my initial suspicions based on the working hypothesis, a copy of that letter was sent to Lord Justice Mummery. I stated:



“My analysis of the overall picture building up leads me to consider this WORKING HYPOTHESIS: Is it possible that elements within the security services found that the strategy they used at the Kincora Boys school was so successful in Northern Ireland that they decided to use it nationally? Could it be a possibility that these constant reports of child sex abuse involving influential figures have never been properly investigated, or prosecuted, because the security establishment are using these cases to blackmail and control establishment figures in politics, the media, the arts and other sectors of the establishment elite? Has there been an ongoing subversion of our democracy by rogue elements within the security service establishment? Whilst protecting us from our enemies beyond these shores is the security apparatus harbouring the enemy within? Is democracy being subverted with the intention that the people of this country be firmly tied to the yoke of totalitarianism?”



From my perspective the mere possibility that the security services could be using paedophilia and blackmail to control UK politicians is extremely disturbing. It might explain why the democratic process seems, increasingly, not to be working in this country? I placed this working hypothesis before Lord Justice Mummery, head of the Investigatory Powers Tribunal, expecting that I might receive some serious response. On November 21st I received a response from the Assistant Tribunal Secretary, he/she sent me four forms. I have responded to that letter today.



It is my belief that the failure by the authorities to properly respond to my correspondence is indicative of the accuracy of my Working Hypothesis. I do believe that it is now essential that the material related to the Paedophile Information Exchange that is in government archives should be published, this to include any material residing in the archives of the security establishment, the Home Office, 10 Downing Street and Scotland Yard. I do believe that there is a strong possibility that the security services are or have been operating beyond the control of the democratically elected government. If paedophilia and blackmail are being used to subvert and control elected politicians then there is nothing I can say to express the seriousness of that proposition. No one has yet denied it is a possibility. I have been met with prevarication and stonewalling from all the official avenues through which I have raised this issue and voiced my concern. There appears to be a conspiracy of silence which encompasses all the main political parties. I believe they are at one in their determination to suppress information and maintain the status quo, however prejudicial that might be to the people of this country and the future of our democracy. The creeping totalitarianism represented by the increasing use of secret courts, overly intrusive surveillance, the detachment from any public accountability of institutions like the N.H.S, and now the threat of legislation to inhibit freedom of the press has, I fear, sown the seeds of serious discord in this country. If the democratic will of the people is not represented by their elected representatives then there can only be only one outcome in the long term, revolt.



There also seems to have been significant subversion by MI5 of the role of the police as a law enforcement agency. The case of the late MP, Sir Cyril Smith is a graphic illustration of this. Recently, a press report appeared on the Daily Telegraph web site with the headline: Sir Cyril Smith Abuse Dossier Seized By MI5. The piece was written by Steven Swinford and appeared at 10pm (GMT) on November 14th. The article referred to a former Special Branch officer, Tony Robinson, who worked for Lancashire Police in the 1970’s. Mr Robinson is quoted as claiming that allegations against Cyril Smith were investigated by the police but were not prosecuted because the then Director of Public Prosecutions considered a prosecution not to be in the public interest. Mr Robinson also claimed that Lancashire Police were instructed by MI5 to send the file to them in London. It has not been seen since. I have personal knowledge of the subversion of the police by government ministers who have intervened to quash police investigations which would otherwise have resulted in the criminal prosecution of elected representatives.



I am keenly aware of the need for balance when dealing with this subject, Sir Max Hastings writing in the Financial Times on November 9th 2012 under the headline Child Abuse is not a National Plague eloquently voiced the opposite view to that which claims that paedophilia is a significant problem in the UK. (http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/65285bb0-299a ... z2E0Bn0m00) Sir Max Hastings is a distinguished journalist but I take issue with his conclusions which have, I believe, been reached after inadequate research and a flawed analysis of the publicly available data. On Tuesday 11th December at 9am BBC Radio 4 broadcast a programme titled Analysing The Child Sex Offender, one contributor stated that approximately 10% of children in this country are sexually abused.



Some have claimed that my campaign to secure the release of the information related to The Paedophile Information Exchange (P.I.E) is misguided as this organisation was closed down during 1985. This viewpoint ignores the fact that there were definite links between members of the security services and P.I.E. This matter is relevant today because there is significant circumstantial evidence to suggest that P.I.E was harbouring an influential membership and support network which is still active in public life. There are also indications that people involved in P.I.E have been protected by the authorities, this quote illustrates the point I am making: “Tom Watson’s (MP) whistleblower was told by a detective that the inquiry into Peter Righton’s alleged ring was closed ‘from on high’. Righton was given a £900 fine for his child porn imports, and a caution for a 30 year old indecent assault. Many similar investigation into paedophile rings have also hit the buffers. Cover-ups have taken place; events and individuals demanding investigation were ignored.” Again there is the allegation of the subversion of the law enforcement role of the police. “Peter Righton was a former leading childcare expert and a founder member of The Paedophile Information Exchange, which campaigned for the age of consent to be reduced to four.”



Recently I was contacted by a journalist from The Daily Mail who said he had been told there was a clear link between Peter Righton and xxxxxxxxxx. There was an alleged link between xxxxxxxx and the security services via his association with the Tory MP, xxxxxxxxxxx. Again this raises the suspicion of the security services being involved in the protection and propagation of paedophiles and paedophilia.



I am not alone in my concerns about the level and nature of child sexual abuse in this country, writing in the Daily Express on Wednesday 12th December 2012 Sonia Poulton said “As a journalist and following the Savile revelations, which opened up this repugnant can of worms, I have interviewed dozens of abuse victims from care homes across the UK and from over a ­period of 30 years ‘in care’. I am left in no doubt that the abuse of children in the system is neither historic nor limited to the Welsh border. I have been shocked by the ­extent of abuse I have discovered. Much of it I have corroborated with social services reports and court documents as well as online government records.



Over the past 30 years there has been an increase in children abused, or ‘missing in care’. Some are drafted into sex gangs, others simply vanish. Last year in Kent 25 children aged 12-17 disappeared from care homes. It was suspected they were trafficked across the UK for labour and sexual exploitation. This is a snapshot of a nationwide problem that we are failing to get to grips with. We must.”



The concerns regarding the care of children in the UK goes beyond the concerns associated with sexual abuse. There are now very real concerns centred on the way in which the child protection court system operates. It is also alleged that the social services are becoming involved in what amounts to the state sponsored abduction of children from families for no other reason than to meet adoption targets set by government. The case of Vicky Haigh raises serious questions as to how the child care system is operating.



“In the Family courts, simultaneously, Doncaster county council is trying to maintain its illegally obtained Care Order and Non Molestation order for the daughter of Vicky Haigh, having placed her with her father after he had been accused of sexually assaulting his daughter. The original taped evidence for this molestation was never given to the CPS by the police. There is also a school accident report book which corroborates her injuries. Elizabeth Watson has been representing Vicky Haigh against Doncaster council, and her threatened imprisonment is part of Doncaster attempts to keep their illegal actions secret. Vicky Haigh has said that she wants this hearing in the Family court made Open, so that Doncaster Council can no longer hide behind the secrecy injunction, exposed by John Hemming in Parliament.” I have spoken with Ms Haigh and viewed the documentation related to her case. On it’s own this case might be legitimately dismissed as the mere pursuit of one parent by another who is motivated by malice but the allegations of the suppressing of evidence and other dirty tricks being used by government agencies has the ring of truth about it and I do believe that this case should be subject to a full, independent, review.



On November 28th Jane Moore writing in The Sun said:



“IT can no longer be ignored by those who purport to be in charge of this country that something is deeply rotten at the core of Britain’s social services.
Believe me, the case of the three Eastern European children removed from a loving home because their foster parents were members of UKIP is just the tip of the iceberg.

Lurking below, in the murky depths of our ferociously secretive “care” system, will be hundreds if not thousands of similar cases where a gross abuse of power has helped to destroy the lives of the very youngsters it was set up to protect.

Hopefully, they will now rise above the surface, expose the ugly, playing-God mindset, and prompt a dramatic overhaul of these tin-pot dictatorships more reminiscent of Stalinist Russia than a modern democracy.

Babies forced into adoption after being taken from mothers on a mere suspicion of “future emotional abuse”, fathers and paternal relatives denied access to children on nothing more than maternal hearsay, and prospective well-meaning fosterers and adopters subjected to the ridiculously stringent political correctness that is making the headlines right now.

All conducted under a cloak of secrecy that claims to be in the interests of the children involved but all too conveniently protects the increasingly warped system itself.

………………………..But all too many cases will be based on nothing more than an unfounded suspicion, plunging one or both parents into a Kafka-esque nightmare, a punishment without crime.

And worst of all, those who suffer most are the children, emotionally damaged by the actions of self-interested zealots who affect to ‘care’.

We are used to case-centric inquiries such as the one surrounding the Baby P scandal, but it’s now time to shine a torch into the dark, secretive corners of the entire system to try to make its work and objectives more transparent while still maintaining anonymity for the vulnerable.”

The concerns as to the workings of the child care system in the UK is also of concern to other governments, on September 12th The Daily Telegraph reported that “The Slovakian government has such 'serious concern' over the workings of Britain’s 'family protection' system that it plans to challenge the legality of the policy in Strasbourg. In an unprecedented move, a foreign government is threatening to take Britain to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) to challenge the unusual readiness of our social workers and courts to remove children from their parents for ‘no sound reason.’”

I could go on as there are reams of reports some alleging, others confirming, that there is a very serious problem with child sexual abuse and the way in which the child care system operates in this country. The attitude of the executive is a mix of denial, collusion and complicity. I have attached copies of the correspondence I have sent in an effort to secure some response from elected and unelected members of the executive. The responses have been a mix of stonewalling and prevarication. In the case of Lord Patten there was no response at all. The only person who has responded properly is Mr. Bernard Hogan-Howe, Commissioner – Metropolitan Police.



PARAGRAPH DELETED





I have the honour to be, Madam, Your Majesty’s humble and obedient servant.





MICHAEL .H. MURRIN



MICHAEL .H. MURRIN

21 GOODWOOD AVENUE. PRESTON. PR2 9TZ

TELE: 0795 – 142 – 6617

michaelmurrin@hotmail.com





Mr D. Cameron, MP.

Prime Minister,

10 Downing Street,

London,

SW1A 2AA. 15th December 2012.





Dear Prime Minister,



Re: The BBC / Jimmy Savile / the Paedophile Information Exchange.



I wrote to you on October 21st concerning the above. A letter was sent from

10 Downing Street on November 1st confirming receipt of my correspondence and advising that “Your correspondence is currently under consideration.” On December 3rd I received a letter via email from Demster Marples, Library and Arts Policy Officer. The letter heading indicated he works for the Ministerial Support Team.

Mr. Marples letter made no attempt to address the issues I raised in my original letter addressed to you.



My letter was focused on the serious matter of child sexual abuse and I am at a loss to understand why you have failed to respond to it seriously. Could it be that there is, in your own mind, one rule for Ivan and another for Tom, Dick and Harry? Do you consider the children of the “plebs” to be nothing more than the disposable playthings of the political and social elite? Is this why you are so dismissive of matters related to the allegations of child sexual abuse involving your political and social peers? Whatever the answers are to these questions your failure to properly respond to my correspondence displays, from my perspective, a callous indifference to the plight of the many victims of child sexual abuse.




Perhaps you agree with the views expressed by Sir Max Hastings. Writing in the Financial Times on November 9th, he said:


“In the era when I was at boarding school, and for many decades before, everybody sniggered about the fact that some schoolmasters – and schoolmistresses – sexually exploited pupils. Cynics said: why else would they take the job? In the Church, and especially the Catholic Church, it is now plain that such malpractices have been widespread. What is remarkable is that many victims have gone on to lead apparently normal lives, though of course some do not.”



To me these words amount to “it never did me any harm” and represent a medieval mindset which has about as much relevance to our present, and our future, as the thumb screw and the rack. Do you agree with me or are you in agreement with the views expressed by Sir Max Hastings? Your failure to respond to my original letter indicates that you are sympathetic to the views expressed by Sir Max Hastings whose opinions are based on inadequate research and a flawed analysis of the publicly available data. The reality is that the sexual abuse of children is a social evil and those subjected to these vile acts never fully recover from the experience. The psychological damage is permanent.



Recently, a press report appeared on the Daily Telegraph web site with the headline:

Sir Cyril Smith Abuse Dossier Seized By MI5. The piece was written by Steven Swinford and appeared at 10pm (GMT) on November 14th. The article referred to a former Special Branch officer, Tony Robinson, who worked for Lancashire Police in the 1970’s. Mr Robinson is quoted as claiming that allegations against Cyril Smith were investigated by the police but were not prosecuted because the then Director of Public Prosecutions considered a prosecution not to be in the public interest. Mr Robinson also claimed that Lancashire Police were instructed by MI5 to send the file to them in London. It has not been seen since. This is one of many similar reports that have surfaced recently. It is alleged that MI5 acted, in effect, as a protection racket for the political elite and subverted the law enforcement role of the police. I have personal experience of this actually happening so don’t try telling me this is fantasy. In effect these practices amount to the state sponsorship of paedophilia. I want to know just how extensive these practices were and whether or not they are operating today?



I could continue to the point where this letter would take on the appearance of a book, but you appear to be so contemptuous of the of the issue of child sexual abuse that writing to you at all appears to be a pointless exercise.



The BBC broadcast a programme on Radio 4 on Tuesday 11th December titled Analysing The Child Sex Offender. A contributor to that programme stated that “…10% of children in the UK are abused.” That is a national scandal. If the security apparatus has been engaged in the sexual exploitation of children to further its own agenda, then that is a cause for national shame. I will repeat to you what I have written to Lord Justice Mummery:



I have raised matters which centre on allegations that the security services have been involved in the systematic and on-going use of paedophilia to blackmail and control public officials in the UK. If these reports are true, and you now seek to frustrate an honest investigation of them, then you are, in my opinion, complicit in the sexual abuse of children. Let me take the gloss off that and spell out to you exactly what that means: You are complicit in the rape and buggery of infants, children and adolescents. If you have, or have had reason to suspect that such evil is/has been deliberately perpetrated and/or concealed by the security establishment which you oversee, and you have failed to act to prevent/investigate it, then your failure to act adds to the magnitude of your complicity.



Those words apply to EVERY SINGLE PERSON in Parliament and in the Executive. None of you can walk past this issue, turn a blind eye to it, and retain your claim to be a part of humanity. The fact that so many of you have done so, for so many decades, is a fact that should compel the most hardened cynics among you to hang their heads in shame.



Yours sincerely,







Michael .H. Murrin

































































MICHAEL .H. MURRIN

21 GOODWOOD AVENUE. PRESTON. PR2 9TZ

TELE: 0795 – 142 – 6617

murrin@hotmail.co.uk



Lord Justice Mummery.

President,

The Investigatory Powers Tribunal,

P.O. Box 33220,

London,

SW1H 9ZQ. 15th December 2012.







Dear Lord Justice Mummery,



RE: SUSPECTED USE OF PAEDOPHILIA BY THE BRITISH SECURITY SERVICES TO

BLACKMAIL AND CONTROL PUBLIC FIGURES IN THE UNITED KINGDOM.



With reference to my recent letter I note that your response came via the Assistant Tribunal Secretary. In view of the serious nature of the matters raised I consider the response of sending four forms for completion to be inadequate and inappropriate.



I have raised matters which centre on allegations that the security services have been involved in the systematic and on-going use of paedophilia to blackmail and control public officials in the UK. If these reports are true, and you now seek to frustrate an honest investigation of them, then you are, in my opinion, complicit in the sexual abuse of children. Let me take the gloss off that and spell out to you exactly what that means: You are complicit in the rape and buggery of infants, children and adolescents. If you have, or have had reason to suspect that such evil is/has been deliberately perpetrated and/or concealed by the security establishment which you oversee, and you have failed to act to prevent/investigate it, then your failure to act adds to the magnitude of your complicity.



Yours sincerely,





Michael .H. Murrin.



















MICHAEL .H. MURRIN

21 GOODWOOD AVENUE. PRESTON. PR2 9TZ

TELE: 0795 – 142 – 6617

murrin@hotmail.co.uk





Mr Bernard Hogan-Howe.

Commissioner – Metropolitan Police,

New Scotland Yard,

Broadway,

City of Westminster,

London,

SW1H 0BG. 15th December 2012





Dear Mr Hogan-Howe,



This will be the last of my correspondence to you. I have enclosed the closing correspondence sent to others for your information. As you are aware I was advised that I have a terminal illness earlier this year and the prognosis is not particularly optimistic.



I am sending through to Commander Peter Spindler details of allegations I have had made to me by a source who is willing to be named and who will provide a statement to the police. The source has provided me with some notes which were signed and dated in my presence on November 10th 2012. I also have over one hour of taped conversation with the source, this tape was made with consent. The allegations concern paedophile activity in the Greater Manchester area. The source alleges that a man introducing himself as the former Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police, Michael Todd, was involved in a paedophile ring in Manchester. It is alleged that Mr Todd made threats directly to the source to have her killed if she sought to pursue her plans to seek to expose this ring and the activities of Mr Todd. Other police officers alleged to be involved are named by the source together with a Labour member of parliament and others, some involved in the legal profession. I have advised the source that the allegations she is making are extremely serious and if they are malicious then it is likely she will face both civil and criminal proceedings. The source is adamant that the allegations are truthful and reflect events that she personally experienced.



I will also send through to Mr Spindler details of information I received during my investigation undertaken from 1982 – 1992. Included are allegations of:



1. Intervention by senior politicians in investigations involving political corruption.

The investigations were closed down on the direct instructions of the politicians

named. The investigations were by various government agencies, including the

police.





2. The corrupt receipt of political donations KNOWN by the recipients to have

originated from the dealing of class A drugs.



3. The payment of politicians for changes in existing government legislation.



4. The corruption of ministerial office.



5. A connection between Peter Righton and my own investigation during the 1980’s,

and a further connection with MI5.



It is fashionable to consider the police force to be institutionally corrupt. I know from personal experience that this is NOT the case. I have advised, and will continue to advise, anyone who contacts me with information that they should trust the police and provide their co-operation at all times.



Yours sincerely,





Michael .H. Murrin.
HAHA Image

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 2434
Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2009 1:09 pm

PostTue Dec 18, 2012 1:49 pm » by Tjahzi


that's a big chunk.

didn't read the whole thing but i support the idea :flop:
Image

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 1013
Joined: Tue May 08, 2012 11:13 pm
Location: Bristol England

PostMon Jan 07, 2013 6:17 pm » by monica44


Vampic whatever your name is, you are ruining the threads with the same old same old, take the hint that you have put your point across, several times on several threads, can this be an end to in now because it is getting boring. :badair:
We are not human beings on a spiritual journey, we are spiritual beings on a human journey; Stephen Covey.

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 1216
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 6:25 am

PostMon Jan 07, 2013 8:13 pm » by Dagnamski


BRING IT ON!

Image
:alien51:
“If at first, the idea is not absurd, then there is no hope for it”

>>>>>Image

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 8117
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 9:08 am
Location: Next door

PostMon Jan 07, 2013 8:21 pm » by Malogg


monica44 wrote:Vampic whatever your name is, you are ruining the threads with the same old same old, take the hint that you have put your point across, several times on several threads, can this be an end to in now because it is getting boring. :badair:



Exactly n WTF has anything Vamp written to do with an appeal to the Queen ,nae a fkn connection anywhere ,I would ban his @ss for a week or so ,just for nae respect of folks posts fullstop.

:hmmm:
HAHA Image

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 8117
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 9:08 am
Location: Next door

PostMon Jan 07, 2013 8:22 pm » by Malogg


Dagnamski wrote:BRING IT ON!

Image
:alien51:


Hides under bed from ONE ahaha


:lol:
HAHA Image

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 8117
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 9:08 am
Location: Next door

PostMon Jan 07, 2013 8:27 pm » by Malogg


Tjahzi wrote:that's a big chunk.

didn't read the whole thing but i support the idea :flop:



:cheers:

To be honest I only quickly scanned it and it looked ligit so posted it

Really more chance of the Queen hearing pop songs than ever setting eyes on the appeal

And that aint gonna happen unless they are "take that "songs ,me thinks the Queen has the hots for Gary Barlow ahahaha joking.
HAHA Image



  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post
Visit Disclose.tv on Facebook