ANALYSIS THAT THE OIL RIG WAS, INDEED, HIT BY A SPACE WEAPON

[Savwafair2012 Profile]

ANALYSIS THAT THE OIL RIG WAS, INDEED, HIT BY A SPACE WEAPON BEAM

Deep Water Horizon moments after the explosion
By A. True Ott, PhD,
Contributed to Vatic Project by Randa, USA
2010-06-16

Marine biology student Albert Andry III and his three high school buddies Ryan Chaisson, Wes Bourg, and Dustin King were fishing in Andry’s 26-foot catamaran, the Endorfin, the afternoon and evening of April 20, 2010. They had experienced a great afternoon catching black fins around BP’s “AmberjackRig109” – and had decided to spend the night 50 miles offshore under the protective shelter of the Deepwater Horizon rig, fishing for baitfish to be used the next day.

They were about 100 yards from the Deepwater Horizon when the masiverig’slights suddenly went out, and then the first of a series of massive booms shook the rig. Immediately, Andry began videotaping the sequence of events. His amazing tape can be viewed on YouTube -

(VN: Please Note that as the camera moves, the "blue" lines from the sky DO NOT MOVE with the camera rather they stay fixed above the rig, This is important, thus it is not an artifact of the camera itself, and in fact, you can see if you look carefully the reflection of the lines in the water, BUT NOT IN THE FIRE REFLECTION in the water which would happen if it were a camera anonomly. That is a critical point to show this was by the derrick itself and part of the event as it was unfolding and the two beams location matches the holes in the platform as the link here will attest http://vaticproject.blogspot.com/2010/0 ... ction.html )




What is unusual about Andry’s video is the massive beam of intense purple-blue light projecting skyward from the exploding Deepwater Horizon rig. As the video clearly shows, the purple-blue beam was very clear, intense and pronounced during the first 30 seconds of tape, and then faded to just a faint trace 3 minutes later at the concluding end of the video.

What could have caused this anomaly? Why did all survivors of the disaster all tell the same story – the rig’s ELECTRICITY and LIGHTING failed first, well before the explosion occurred. What massive pulse of energy would have the power to short-circuit the Deepwater Horizon’s sheath-protected generators and thickly insulated wiring built to withstand hurricanes and heavy winds, waves, and rain before any explosion occurred? How was it that the electricity failed BEFORE the explosion, not vice verse – according to ALL the eyewitness accounts?

Was the purple-bluebeam of intense light captured on Andry’s video a high-tech laser weapon designed to cause the pressurized pipe to super-heat, melt, burst and explode? If so, who would deploy such a dastardly device, and for what purpose or reason?

DOES SUCH A WEAPON EVEN EXIST?

The simple answer to this question is yes, absolutely YES. Caledan“infrared chemical laser”, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) inconjunction with the Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) not only has built such a satellite-based weapon, they deployed it years ago, both on the ground as well as on orbiting satellites.

According to Wikipedia, MIRACL, or Mid-Infrared Advanced Chemical Laser, is the only known successful directed energy weapon developed by the US Navy. It is a deuterium fluoride laser, a type of chemical laser.

The MIRACL laser first became operational in 1980. It can produce over a megawatt of output for up to 10 minutes, making it the most powerful continuous wave (CW) laser in the US. Its original goal was to be able to track and destroy anti-ship cruise missiles, but in later years it was used to test phenomenologies associated with national anti-ballistic and anti-satellite laser weapons.

http://vaticproject.blogspot.com/



This guy is a fucking moron if he believe's this isn't just a light reflection of the flame's

[Vatic Profile]

I find it very interesting that you neglected to provide the Vatic Note to that piece which would have explained about the camera light. If you had included it people could have made up their own mind.
What you see now that you put up is NOT WHAT WAS THERE BEFORE. It was put up between the night of the 18th and the morning of the 19th. Read the rest yourself. And when done, come over to the next link below this whole note and see what we found out today. It fits with all of this. There was no blue line in that picture for a solid three days until the morning of the 19th. Someone put it in there after they gutted the video which had been around for weeks, and once we did our post on the laser beam and it was confirmed by Dr. Ott, then it was gutted. Go ahead and read about it and then watch out for anyone who only puts up part of the story and then makes a conclusion based on withholding information. Sounds like a government job to me.

http://vaticproject.blogspot.com/2010/0 ... after.html

Then also watch Salduchi's video about the holes in the platform and they do match the two beams we saw on the video of the event as it was happening.

http://vaticproject.blogspot.com/2010/0 ... laser.html
(here is what this poster left off that is on the site of the first link above, now why did he do that?)
Vatic Note: Update info: 6/19/10 - as you noticed, we notified you of the missing video back on 6/16. All we had left was the picture of the fire and we are unsure how long the video had been down, but now today we saw something that was not there for all the time that only the picture had been up, and that is a purple line running through the fire and water. We work this site many times a day as you can probably imagine, and we knew there was no artifact on that picture during all that time until today. That means someone messed with it between last night when we signed off and this morning when we signed back on again, the purpose is to make it appear to be a camera anomoly rather than what we described above the video as to what we actually saw and there are witnesses to those two beams which did not move when the camera moved and that is a big indicator that the anomoly was NOT in the camera. and now because of that effort on someones part, to cover up something that would implicate the government in this crime, we now are certain that the space ship launched around the same time as the blow out is what certainly did the deed. Dr. Otts observation about the type of weapon makes perfect sense. Mr. Salduchi's observation of the platform hole also, added to Dr. Ott, makes sense as well. There simply is no other explanation.

Update Info: 6/16/10 - First of all the Video below that we both, Ott and I, had has been gutted and removed, so I apologize, it worked this afternoon as I double checked to make sure I was right about the beams, but they don't want you to see it, so its gone, however, here is an email I received from a regular that I have known for some time now. (I left this off because all he does is confirm this fit with his own assessment of the cause of the blow out).

Here is the latest on the scam called the BP blow out and apocolyptic event.

http://vaticproject.blogspot.com/2010/0 ... nized.html

[Oxize Profile]

The beam is just an ordinary comma reflection on the camera. You even see the beam before the helmet of the chopper guy which is in front of the camera.

No space weapon... Just use comon sense people and dont spread disinformation. Even video editors or dlst amateurs/profs know this reflection.

[Daemonfoe Profile]

also, when the camera tilts, the beam doesn't....

[Vatic Profile]

The beam is just an ordinary comma reflection on the camera. You even see the beam before the helmet of the chopper guy which is in front of the camera.

No space weapon... Just use comon sense people and dont spread disinformation. Even video editors or dlst amateurs/profs know this reflection.

You need to "read". I am sorry, if you decide to make a decision about anything because its easier than reading and thinking and researching, then so be it and we then get exactly what we deserve.

I put up what happened and also told you I had witnesses to the fact THERE WAS NO BLUE LINE IN THAT PHOTOGRAPH FROM THE 16TH TO THE 19TH AND WE ARE POSTING ON THERE MANY TIMES A DAY SO WE WOULD HAVE SEEN IT IF IT HAD BEEN THERE. It was put up by someone not affiliated with the site or with anyone who has access to that site. It was put up on the 19th sometime in the early morning before we came on to work it. Please, people, this all is serious enough to take the time, give a damn and find out what is real. Remember, they have even told us publically they now have a cyber team working the net. I suspect that is what happened. Think about how serious this would be if it got out and it did.

WHY GUT THE VIDEO FROM THE SITE??? WHAT IS THE REASON? WHY PUT UP A BLUE ANOMOLY, COME ON, "THINK", ASK QUESTIONS... I don't want to think about what they are not teaching in our schools.

[Vatic Profile]

also, when the camera tilts, the beam doesn't....

No, but the beam will move relative to the reflection of the fire and movement of the boat, and I have personal knowledge and experience in that area. I lived on a sail boat for three years and we were always dealing with camera anomoly out at sea, since there is no natural like like there is around land unless you have close to a full moon. No light pollution. So the camera picks up everything, and when I saw those two beams and then saw the double hole in the platform I knew this was no camera anomolly. And when the boat moves, if it is a camera problem, the blue light goes wavy and shifts because the fire in the picture moves and shifts. Duh. Neither of those beams did that and when the camera moved off the fire the beams stayed directly over the fire AND NOT THROUGH IT LIKE YOU SEE IN THE STILL above that someone put in because this is exactly what a camera problem looks like since its IN THE CAMERA, not out above the rig. lol

[Daemonfoe Profile]

also, when the camera tilts, the beam doesn't....

No, but the beam will move relative to the reflection of the fire and movement of the boat, and I have personal knowledge and experience in that area. I lived on a sail boat for three years and we were always dealing with camera anomoly out at sea, since there is no natural like like there is around land unless you have close to a full moon. No light pollution. So the camera picks up everything, and when I saw those two beams and then saw the double hole in the platform I knew this was no camera anomolly. And when the boat moves, if it is a camera problem, the blue light goes wavy and shifts because the fire in the picture moves and shifts. Duh. Neither of those beams did that and when the camera moved off the fire the beams stayed directly over the fire AND NOT THROUGH IT LIKE YOU SEE IN THE STILL above that someone put in because this is exactly what a camera problem looks like since its IN THE CAMERA, not out above the rig. lol

ok but why does the angle of the beam point straight down even when the camera is tilted? that makes no sense.

[lamonema Profile]

I saw the blue beam on the news when it happened. I figured it was some kind of energy released from the well, plasma kinda like earthquake lights, or just camara glare. I find it funny that the news has not shown this video since.

[Emeraldtruth Profile]

Hi Vatic,
As a percentage how sure are you that the blue light was added later?

If 100% then it's possibly 2 things;
1. Just bored muppets, or
2. A new piece of evidence will soon emerge which this aims to distract from.

Hopefully possibilty 1,
There is a third possibilty I suppose..
3. There exists within the footage some implicating evidence yet generally unrealised. This blue light hoax would stop people viewing the original thoroughly because it would have them associate it with

Good luck to those investigating, who care more than I about uncovering this truth.

[Ghost32 Profile Website]

The Fire Is So Bright That It Causes Lens Flare Thats Why The Effect Can Be Seen On The Inside Interior Of The Helicopter.