AND AGAIN BIRDS DEAD IN KENTUCKY!!!

Tue Jan 04, 2011 3:00 am » by **Chrisfryfyi**

http://www.wpsdlocal6.com/news/local/Woman-reports-dozens-of-dead-birds-in-her-yard-112830524.html

if its to blame on fireworks why has it never happend before?,

America sounds screwed to me

Tue Jan 04, 2011 3:03 am » by **Stratafire**

Well not to remain too repetitive but:

Grab the coordinates for each incident involving the huge deaths of birds, set a time table limit (6 months) and maybe their will be a pattern.. it's more 'random" right now...

Tue Jan 04, 2011 3:10 am » by **Zegtelzegtel**

this is getting creapy..

Tue Jan 04, 2011 3:15 am » by **Mep630**

We been telling you all for years now, how many more birds and shit have to die?!

They are spraying shit all over the world, they are poisoning everything with it. This means you and your kids too, look up!!!!!! It happens just about every day!!!!

But what do I know, listen to an expert ->

Upload to Disclose.tv

Tue Jan 04, 2011 3:33 am » by **Stratafire**

Sigh.. "saying it" and using "methodical" methods of data gathering, are two entirely different things, one is from the view of the individual(s) making the statements, the other is simply "raw data", based on "evidence" gathered through reports, that have been verified by third party sources, by itself, it can make no judgment, it can produce no answer (right or wrong) but it can (however) provide the groundwork for proof of "concept" when being presented to more then ones self..

That is all I mean by the statement, if this is happening, then a pattern will form, providing a clearer "theory" with greater supportive "Raw-Data", raw data that can be used by others to further refine the process of elimination, until what one is left with, is "factual data" that even the most stubborn and or astute "Pedigreed" A-mentality person cannot refute, but rather take "seriously"...

Tue Jan 04, 2011 4:26 am » by **Reinaul**

stratafire wrote:Sigh.. "saying it" and using "methodical" methods of data gathering, are two entirely different things, one is from the view of the individual(s) making the statements, the other is simply "raw data", based on "evidence" gathered through reports, that have been verified by third party sources, by itself, it can make no judgment, it can produce no answer (right or wrong) but it can (however) provide the groundwork for proof of "concept" when being presented to more then ones self..

That is all I mean by the statement, if this is happening, then a pattern will form, providing a clearer "theory" with greater supportive "Raw-Data", raw data that can be used by others to further refine the process of elimination, until what one is left with, is "factual data" that even the most stubborn and or astute "Pedigreed" A-mentality person cannot refute, but rather take "seriously"...

Tue Jan 04, 2011 4:43 am » by **Likeitornot**

Just like the honey bees disappearing...