Melted Cars at the WTC Blocks from the Towers
Mar 15, 2008
What Melted Cop Cars 7
Blocks From WTC On 911?
The official story about 911 is that burning airplane fuel weakened the steel buildings at the World Trade Center, causing them to collapse. But if that is true, how can one explain the strange damage inflicted upon autos as far away as FDR drive (7 blocks from the WTC )?
Figure 64. Peculiar wilting of car doors and deformed window surrounds on FDR Drive
Figure Map. Areal view of lower Manhattan.
*MAKE SURE YOU OPEN THIS LINK*
You must see these pictures, then you will see. All the pictures are here.
Tons More Melted Car Photos
http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/DEW/ ... Beam5.html
From Ted Twietmeyer
I wish to clarify several issues with regard to my article on my possible explanation for the "toasted" WTC vehicles:
1. I welcome commentary from those who lived or worked within the blast/damage zone and have something to substantiate their claim. It is very important to discover and see evidence of melted metal in buildings between the WTC and damaged vehicle locations.
2. Destroyed computers, radios and televisions electronics from an EMP pulse are important evidence to support the theory. This was only briefly mentioned in the article. It is not currently known whether an EMP was present in conjunction with a magnetic pulse.
If you have a destroyed piece of equipment from that day you can contact me about where to ship it. I'll analyze it and give you a report on exactly what failed.
3. Seismological recordings are already on record showing another explosion occurred when at least one plane hit. This information was publicized years ago, and was probably the weapon that insured the building(s) would come down. If two such weapons detonated at exactly the same time, it may appear as one event on a seismological recording unless an interferometer method was employed using 2 or more recordings at distant locations.
4. There is an email spammer out on the web using data4science. net website to generate bulk spam emails (big surprise.) These emails do NOT originate at my webserver, and I'm receiving them as well. Our email server for the website does NOT have public bulk email software. Our webmaster wrote his own secure emailing program for the server that only sends out occasional newsletters to volunteers only. The program cannot be remotely activated. Kiddy-hackers easily mis-configure any number of bulk email programs and popular email programs such as Outlook Express, Eudora, etc.. to put any person's name (or website) as the sender.
5. The article is not meant to be the only possible explanation. The title cautiously states that it is only a POSSIBLE explanation. It is mainly intended to get people thinking about other events of that day. And based on the positive response I've received from many readers, it has accomplished that.
6. Using the images from another website may or may not have been a mistake. Some readers are certain that the two rows of vehicles in the parking lot shown were moved there. However, there isn't any photographic evidence to support this. Undisturbed dust UNDER the vehicles shows these vehicles were there all along since the collapse. For those who are sure they were moved, consider these facts: And if the vehicles were moved, would any tow truck driver go to the trouble to "sort" the vehicles in a such a way to move them to the parking lot shown, orienting them all the same way and grouping them according to damage? When there were hundreds of destroyed vehicles to be moved? Tow-truck and flat bed drivers are paid by the vehicle, and the more vehicles they move the more money they make. A totaled vehicle is still a total loss and not worth sorting.
7. My apologies for the typo about the definition of a Giga-watt that passed by me. 1 Giga-watt = 1,000 million watts.
8. Please do not waste my time or yours writing me hate-spam emails. These will no longer be read or responded to and will be auto-deleted. People who love mainstream network news and believe every word they hear are usually the writers of such trash.
I still welcome your constructive thoughts.
www. data4science. net?
- ID: bec86372862c
- ID: e4a6b540f970
I still belive 9/11 was an inside job but this could explain a lot of the unusual burns. We're just not used to classifying this phenomenon because buildings dont normally collapse when theyve caught fire. The twin towers were massive structures which had a HUGE incendiary start (two jets) which ignited enormous fires within the buildings.
A volcano's pyroclastic flow usually will show similar results......
Now what the fuck does that do?
You feel better now, I didnt let you pass.
How bout I stop my car and beat your fuckin' ass?
realorfake wrote:HUGE incendiary start (two jets) which ignited enormous fires within the buildings
yes but thats not entirely true is it.
The release ( finally) of the tapes from the fire fighters that made it to the floors where the jets hit puts paid to the "enourmous fires" theory.
They can be heard saying they could have put the fires out with just a couple of crews and lines.
Most of the jet fuel exploded and vaporized when the jets struck.
There werent enormous fires inside the buildings.
As another example of thier strange conclusions, if it was the rageing fires from the jet feul that bought down the towers, how come the pentagon didnt burn to the ground.
Supposedly it was the same type of plane, same amount of fuel, small fire.
* disclaimer-user makes no commitment to live up to this claim
Both vehicles in the op have been moved.
Both have received structural damage, most likely from falling debris. Since the debris is missing, they have obviously been moved.
Painting vehicles and bodywork has been both a hobby, and a profession of mine in lack of other work, since I was 16.
While both vehicles pictured, did receive fire damage, the structural damage pictured is not due to the amounts of excessive heats claimed. It's most likely from building debris falling on top of them. That should be very clear, especially in the squad car photo. On the firetruck it is obvious as well. The damaged squashed area? Take a look. The paint is still on the doors! Heat intense enough to cause the structural melting of either vehicle, would have removed all of the paint on them as well.
- ID: bec86372862c
- ID: bec86372862c
- Related topics
- Last post