Anti Obama billboard on I70 Kansas City Missouri...WOW.

Mon Feb 22, 2010 6:37 am » by **Mercury**

http://www.kctv5.com/video/21176438/index.html

Mon Feb 22, 2010 6:44 am » by **Bahb3**

That's the part of town where all the meth cooks live.

Mon Feb 22, 2010 6:45 am » by **Memccool**

lmao now that is funny

Mon Feb 22, 2010 6:51 am » by **Dogmeat**

If President Obama did half the crap the other Presidents did like passing executive orders that bypass the constitution or international law i am sure he would take twice the heat from angry whites.

He is pretty much just a liberal Republican dressing as a democrat. Personally I would choose socialism over fascism any day of the week. :peep:

Mon Feb 22, 2010 6:57 am » by **Bahb3**

Thought it was pretty sick how the preacher sided with insurance Companies and Corporations over the people...

Jesus was a socialist.

Mon Feb 22, 2010 7:08 am » by **Dogmeat**

bahb3 wrote:Thought it was pretty sick how the preacher sided with insurance Companies and Corporations over the people...

Jesus was a socialist.

Yes, Christ was a socialist. Look what they did to him in return for his efforts to heal the sick for free, feed the hungry and generally discredit organized religion.

I hear that telling people in Jerusalem under the age of 18 about him to make converts can get a prison sentence. That seems really strange and I am passingly familiar with strange.

Mon Feb 22, 2010 8:01 am » by **Disorganizer81**

Bush averaged 35.5 Executive Orders a year. Obama has siged 39 Executive Orders his first year. Yeah.......................that is more than Bush's average and way more than half than Bush's first year. With the facts, do I have a reason to be mad at Obama the way I was at Bush?

Socialism, Communism, Facism. All the same. All left wing too. Considering Bush was a progressive socialist and Obama is Bush on steroids, that makes Obama a progressive quasi enviro commie.

Jesus was not a Socialist. He was a mixture of all things. He would not agree with forced charity but rather would be a proponent of peeps helping others themselves. Yes, you can only help someone so much before you tell them to help themselves.

Mon Feb 22, 2010 2:30 pm » by **Dogmeat**

disorganizer81 wrote: With the facts, do I have a reason to be mad at Obama the way I was at Bush? Socialism, Communism, Facism. All the same. All left wing too. Considering Bush was a progressive socialist and Obama is Bush on steroids, that makes Obama a progressive quasi enviro commie.

Well I see what your are trying to say but it seems to be a stretch. Of course you can be as angry as the law allows at anyone for anything perceived or real. The words "progressive quasi enviro commie" are kind of musical and original too. But what does that mean?

[/quote]Jesus was not a Socialist. He was a mixture of all things.[/quote]

So if this statement is true Jesus was a front man for the CIA ,a tailor, a junkie,transvestite and a DEA agent? Or do you mean in the scriptural context where he said "Be all things to all men?" ( I am not attacking your post just showing debate technique to draw out more accurate information.)

[/quote] He would not agree with forced charity but rather would be a proponent of peeps helping others themselves. Yes, you can only help someone so much before you tell them to help themselves.[/quote]

Forced charity? Is this like the Federal Government taxing the poor to subsidize Amtrak or pharmacies that out source work to third world countries where pollution standards are virtually non-existent? Or giving Haliburton dibbs on contract murder?

Or is this the bibical Apocalypse where Christ is going to judge the World and destroy all that oppose him. (Anti-christ.) This would be the ultimate "Love it or leave it scenario."

Charity:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charity_%28virtue%29

The duality here is mind boggling!

The issue of what Christ represents is part of the mess we are all in currently as far as most major religion goes, Christan versus (insert belief here including other Christian beliefs.)

I sincerely am not happy with many of Obama's policies myself but If both he and Bush are on the far left , what is on the far right? I am really curious as I feel like I am apparently uninformed .

D.

Mon Feb 22, 2010 4:16 pm » by **Disorganizer81**

Well for starters mate, the poor and middle class barely pay any of the taxes in this country. The "poor" pay NO taxes. The middle class is taxed enough to hurt them by subsidizing the poor. The middle class is who is under attack. The rich pay the majority of the taxes then pay more when they file a return. Do you know businesses have to pay a tax just to hire someone and pay a tax to cut them a check? Anyway,since you are all about class warfare, I figured you should realize a good portion of the lower class HAVE ONLY THEMSELVES TO BLAME. I am lower class, and it is a choice. I am free to choose to only make 20,000 a year and I am damn proud of the liberty to do so.

Mon Feb 22, 2010 4:32 pm » by **Disorganizer81**

The U.S. is not a democracy it is a Republic. Hmmmmm. Republican. Republic. A Republic is just right of center which is small and limited. A Constitutional Republic is just right of center and chained down, restraing that small government from ever growing. So if on the far left you have tyranny, facism, dictatorship etc etc.... Then on the far right, you would have NO government whatsoever. The far right is anarchy. So under these facts it is safe to say that if a Republican expands the size of government, then he\she is not really a Republican but a leftist. The Eagle always looks to the far right towards anarchy, turning its back on the left and tyranny.