Banned TEDx Talk About Giants and Mounds!

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 2114
Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2010 10:08 pm
Location: The outlet by the light switch

PostSun Dec 29, 2013 1:51 am » by Thebluecanary


Nifty TEDx talk about Mound Builders, which was pulled from the series because it was controversial.


Upload to Disclose.tv

Remember, in a real conspiracy, all players are pawns regardless of their rank.
-----Christopher Hyatt

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 2114
Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2010 10:08 pm
Location: The outlet by the light switch

PostSun Dec 29, 2013 2:06 am » by Thebluecanary


Here's another awesome, long video that touches on Clovis culture, Paleolithic archaeology, and lots of other interesting questions:


Upload to Disclose.tv

Remember, in a real conspiracy, all players are pawns regardless of their rank.
-----Christopher Hyatt

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 3233
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 10:50 pm
Location: 2 Thirds Down The Bottle

PostSun Dec 29, 2013 2:14 am » by Toxic32


Thebluecanary wrote:Nifty TEDx talk about Mound Builders, which was pulled from the series because it was controversial.


Upload to Disclose.tv



:flop: :flop: :flop:
Image
I question everything. I don't believe anything I'm told or anything I see. Prove it, or fuck off. And that's not me I see in the mirror in the morning.

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 4463
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 6:11 am
Location: Earth

PostSun Dec 29, 2013 2:34 am » by Shaggietrip


Thebluecanary wrote:Nifty TEDx talk about Mound Builders, which was pulled from the series because it was controversial.


Upload to Disclose.tv








:flop: :flop: :flop: good stuff there. :cheers:
ImageImage
Star watchers,Sun,Moon or just space in interest. https://www.darkskywatcher.com/dsw74.html

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 2114
Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2010 10:08 pm
Location: The outlet by the light switch

PostSun Dec 29, 2013 3:02 am » by Thebluecanary


The guy in the second vid is Dennis Stanford. He is the director of Paleoarchaeology at the Smithsonian. For him to advocate his theory (that the Solutrian culture of Europe "influenced" the development of Clovis culture in North America) is damn near scientific heresy. He basically is saying that a paleolithic culture from prehistoric France and Spain had the capability to cross the Atlantic. The distribution of Clovis culture along the american Southeast into the interior as he postulates is a slap in the face to the "everyone in pre-Columbian America trooped across the Bering land bridge" party line that the Smithsonian itself has set up as unbreakable scientific canon for 150 years.

This is him winking and nudging the "heretical" theory of cultural diffusionism at a mainstream archaeological conference. And still keeping his job at the Smithsonian. This tells me that the evidence is becoming so great that they can't ignore it anymore, and they're slowly going to allow changes in the canon. Imagine what evidence this man has seen that he isn't allowed to talk about?
Remember, in a real conspiracy, all players are pawns regardless of their rank.
-----Christopher Hyatt

Member
Posts: 5
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2013 3:22 am

PostSun Dec 29, 2013 3:35 am » by Chipmunk5


To be fair, I believe this has been a respected idea within academic archaeology for quite some time.

EDIT: by that I mean the possible European origins of the Clovis culture.
Last edited by Chipmunk5 on Sun Dec 29, 2013 3:43 am, edited 1 time in total.

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 4463
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 6:11 am
Location: Earth

PostSun Dec 29, 2013 3:41 am » by Shaggietrip


Chipmunk5 wrote:To be fair, I believe this has been a respected idea within academic archaeology for quite some time.




Perhaps so. A bit more info than a blurb would have been nice. :hiho: BTW. When carbon dating came up I did cringe a bit. Over all, stand by me 1st opinion as good stuff. If ya have anything please post link or more thoughts. :flop:

Again welcome to Dtv. :cheers:
ImageImage
Star watchers,Sun,Moon or just space in interest. https://www.darkskywatcher.com/dsw74.html

Member
Posts: 5
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2013 3:22 am

PostSun Dec 29, 2013 3:47 am » by Chipmunk5


Ok, here's Bradley and Stanford's paper on it from 2004.

Check the reference list for more details:

http://planet.uwc.ac.za/nisl/Conservati ... 202004.pdf

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 4463
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 6:11 am
Location: Earth

PostSun Dec 29, 2013 3:49 am » by Shaggietrip


Chipmunk5 wrote:Ok, here's Bradley and Stanford's paper on it from 2004.

Check the reference list for more details:

http://planet.uwc.ac.za/nisl/Conservati ... 202004.pdf



Thanks :cheers:
ImageImage
Star watchers,Sun,Moon or just space in interest. https://www.darkskywatcher.com/dsw74.html

Writer
User avatar
Posts: 64
Joined: Fri Dec 27, 2013 6:06 pm

PostSun Dec 29, 2013 5:07 am » by Love


This is my first ever time of hearing about this :o

Image


Next

  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post
Visit Disclose.tv on Facebook