BBC Correspondent says MOSSAD did 9/11 and Iran doesn't want

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 2027
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 9:45 pm

You might like:

PostSun Sep 05, 2010 10:10 am » by Anuki


BBC Correspondent says MOSSAD did 9/11 and Iran doesn't want Nukes SEE


[youtube]CDsW4DyyZvU&feature[/youtube]

Former Senior BBC Mideast Correspondent Alan Hart says on air that Israeli Mossad did 9/11 and much more in his revealing interview with Kevin Barrett which can be heard here- http://www.radiodujour.com/mp3/201005... Alan explains the take over of America by zionists and exposes the failed false flag attack of the USS Liberty by Israel using Napalm.



Larry Silverstein -- Larry is a Jewish American businessman from New York. Larry obtained a 99 year lease on the entire world trade center complex on 24 July, 2001. The nearly worthless trade towers I should point out due to them being filled with asbestos that needed removal; a process that would have produced a cost that would have rivaled the cost of the lease itself. Larry explains his reason for purchasing the towers as "I felt a compelling urge to own them." Is this a believable reason coming from a supposed successful businessman? Larry had breakfast in "Windows on the World" restaurant (located in North Tower 107th Floor) every single morning. Larry was absent from this routine meeting on the morning of September the 11th. Larry's two offspring, who also worked in the WTC, also conveniently decided to take the day off. Either the Silverstein family is clairvoyant, or then knew exactly what was going down that day. Take your pick. Larry Silverstein scored more than $4.5 Billion in insurance money as a result of the destruction of his complex. Silverstein was personal friends with key player in Zionist controlled media Rupert Murdoch, former Israeli president & infamous Zionist war criminal Ariel Sharon, as well as Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu. Silverstein was such good friends with Benjamin Netanyahu that he would receive a phone call from him every single sunday.


A simple question and a 3 min.answer with a lot of details
[youtube]9ScGZCqEyGM&feature[/youtube]

Got a few hours..?
Israel did 9/11 - ALL THE PROOF IN THE WORLD
http://theinfounderground.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=5367&start=0

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 2027
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 9:45 pm

PostSun Sep 05, 2010 10:17 am » by Anuki




Those who question the official epxlanation of the 9/11 2001 attacks cling to this one issue. The owner of the World Trade Centers (the three that collapsed) said in an interview that he and the FDNY decided to PULL the building. The debate rages about the term and whether it has anything to do with the controlled demolition industry.

It takes several weeks or months to prepare a building for implosion.

Writer
Posts: 32
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 9:45 pm

PostSun Sep 05, 2010 11:08 am » by Robenergy


anuki wrote:

Those who question the official epxlanation of the 9/11 2001 attacks cling to this one issue. The owner of the World Trade Centers (the three that collapsed) said in an interview that he and the FDNY decided to PULL the building. The debate rages about the term and whether it has anything to do with the controlled demolition industry.

It takes several weeks or months to prepare a building for implosion.


who got a contract for an 8.6 million dollar upgrade of security systems at the wtc site?

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 1280
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 10:10 am
Location: CyberSpace

PostSun Sep 05, 2010 11:15 am » by Ghost32


In the Charles Rose interview he slipped up, he said he turned on the television and the first plane hit and then the second plane hit.But as far as I understand it, the first plane hitting was not seen live and footage of the 1st plane was aquired after the event from eyewitnesses.Bush Jr. also made this same mistake once leading to the idea that many elites watched the entire event on their own video feed.

Image

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 1887
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 2:29 pm

PostSun Sep 05, 2010 1:08 pm » by zinzana


ghost32 wrote:In the Charles Rose interview he slipped up, he said he turned on the television and the first plane hit and then the second plane hit.But as far as I understand it, the first plane hitting was not seen live and footage of the 1st plane was aquired after the event from eyewitnesses.Bush Jr. also made this same mistake once leading to the idea that many elites watched the entire event on their own video feed.



i had the same feeling at first when i heard the wtc was hit by a plane
i thought it was some kind of accident
only when the second tower was hit it was clear it was an attack
and very soon after the first tower was hit there was a live feed of the wtc
maybe thats what he means by saying he saw the first tower being hit and he thought that it was an accident
i'm sure that at first everyone thought it was an accident
and than u see him in the classroom and this guy is whispering something to his ear
and u claim u know what he whisperd and u dont even know what time he was in the classroom.....maybe he was watching cnn as it went online like everybody else on the planet.....but no u claim some official white house spokesman said what the guy at the classroom whisperd to him....and i bet u have a link to that official spokesman or a video of him saying what u claim he is saying?

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 1887
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 2:29 pm

PostSun Sep 05, 2010 1:37 pm » by zinzana


[youtube]CDsW4DyyZvU&feature[/youtube]

this people claim mossad agent penetrated this operation but according to bin laden no one knew what was the target not even the guys who flew the planes
bin laden is saying clearly that the guys who flew the planes were told about the target only a half an hour before they boarded the planes
but u guys claim that 4000 jews recieved a phone call warning tham not to come to work that day
isn't that a contradiction
u also claim of 5 israelis were dancing with cellphones in their hands
i'm still waiting for that video to surface coz i havnt seen it yet

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 2197
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 2:18 am

PostSun Sep 05, 2010 2:13 pm » by Proto


wow this video again , it was posted at least 2 times before ,but anyways :

Alan Hart

Image
in the middle . hosting a forum on the Islamic channel .

previously employed by the iranian government through the Press TV state-funded
news station (or in other words iranian propaganda network) ,on which he had a program called Hart of the Matter .

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Press_TV#Former_programmes

i wouldn't be surprised if he's still on the pay roll tbh .

one of the most obvious displays of his bias happened when the BBC correspondent Alan Johnston, went missing in Gaza , and hart automatically blamed israel , claiming israel has most to gain from johnston disappearance , later on johnston was freed ,and it turned out that indeed he was kidnapped by a group of Palestinian militants ,israel had nothing to do with it . which shows exactly how reliable hart claims are .


he also wrote the books “Zionism: The Real Enemy of the Jews” and “Arafat, Terrorist or Peacemaker?” , in those books he expressed the typical biased one sided anti israel point of view.

--------------
obsessive Israel-haters like Hart will always believe that Israel is guilty of any imaginable crime, no matter how much of a stretch is necessary to do so. Although Hart repeats over and over on his site that he is quite aware of the distinction between anti-Zionism and antisemitism, his delusive approach to reality suggests that there is more to his motivation than a simple journalistic search for truth.

http://fresnozionism.org/2007/04/alan-h ... el-hatred/
Image

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 1037
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2009 4:54 pm

PostSun Sep 05, 2010 2:27 pm » by Ogmios


That's funny. First you say that Alan Hart is unreliable because he has a "typical" anti-Israeli viewpoint; then you yourself quote from a source which admits it is "pro-Israel". Would that be "typically pro-Israel"?
"God is a concept by which we measure our pain"
John Lennon

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 2197
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 2:18 am

PostSun Sep 05, 2010 2:39 pm » by Proto


ogmios wrote:That's funny. First you say that Alan Hart is unreliable because he has a "typical" anti-Israeli viewpoint; then you yourself quote from a source which admits it is "pro-Israel". Would that be "typically pro-Israel"?


indeed that's funny , it's funny that if it's pro israel site you immediately label it as wrong ,
you don't expect to hear the other point of view on a pro palestinian or anti israel
web site do you ? or maybe you are not interested to hear the other side at all ?

will you reject the fact that hart already been proved wrong on some of his false claims
against israel ? you can verify it on other sites as well .
Image

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 1887
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 2:29 pm

PostSun Sep 05, 2010 3:06 pm » by zinzana


if those claims were true any investigator with a half a brain would pick up on the so called 4000 jews did not come to work that day claim
and that would probably ignite a red warning light in his head
and those 4000 phone lines and everything else around it would have been thoroughly investigated

Next
  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

We are listed at the www.topparanormalsites.com website. Click here to vote for us.. Thank you :-)