Biblical Giants Debunked !

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 5247
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 9:19 pm

You might like:

PostWed Sep 21, 2011 5:30 am » by Harbin


King James says no way about biblical giants.



"every imagination of his thoughts were evil continually"...
Image
Antiwar.com

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 2617
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2011 4:05 pm
Location: Left of centre

PostWed Sep 21, 2011 8:38 am » by Fatdogmendoza


Those two words just dont sit well together with me....Bible and Truth....If it what floats your boat I take no issue with that.
Would somebody please slap Jessie J......PLEASE!

Initiate
Posts: 214
Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2011 4:57 pm

PostWed Sep 21, 2011 9:35 am » by Pitchke


We humans think we know everything, but actually we know nothing. We know shit! We don't know much about the universe, we know not much about our own history... Those holy books are writen by humans about things they didn't understand, full of stories, and legends... And in history those holy books where many times rewritten and censored by other humans...

The bible is telling us story's about giants
The greek mythology is telling us about giants
The native americans are telling us about giants...

Do you really believe the history as you know it, that we lived for 190.000 years in caves and suddenly start building those big structures and temples out of nothing? Our history is corrupted as hell. When some archeologists start to find strange anomalies in our history. Human footprints of a million years old, giant bones, metal objects of a million year olds... their theory's are not accepted by other academics!

Iff people know nothing about our real history, and iff you can't trust what is written in the bible. HOW THE FUCK CAN YOU DEBUNK SOMETHING like that...

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 2623
Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2009 12:10 pm
Location: Neutral Zone

PostWed Sep 21, 2011 11:49 am » by Svaha


Also known as the queen James version.
Follow your bliss(ters) - Joseph Campbell

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 5223
Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2010 10:57 pm

PostWed Sep 21, 2011 11:53 am » by Otoel


svaha wrote:Also known as the queen James version.


Wachu talking aboot you godam blasphemer??!!

LOL How you doing mang?
evidence of what,otoel? that you're fucking certifiably insane? you watch a children's show,and analyze it,for hours then in your spare time,you give distorted scripture studies for a bunch of losers on the interweb.-Boon

Initiate
User avatar
Posts: 323
Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 9:14 pm
Location: Gone Fishing!

PostWed Sep 21, 2011 11:54 am » by Neversaydie


That's settled then....must be true. :badair:
Remember this day and prepare yourselves for it is a time of great revealing.
For when it arrives, mankind will finally know the truth about everything


Image

Initiate
User avatar
Posts: 673
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 6:20 pm

PostWed Sep 21, 2011 12:08 pm » by 7hidden7agenda7


It's "interesting" to note, that Neanderthal men most likely raped our homosapien women, who then gave birth to occasionally viable half breeds, which then went on to account for about 1-4% of our dna (unless you're of strictly african decent). Neanderthal woman were most likely not raped by homosapien men (for a number of reasons, not least for being more masculine than our men) and even if they were there is no evidence of their mitochondrial dna left in our species.
It's also "interesting" to note, that LIGERS exist...... I'll leave you to draw your own conclusions about that. But I won't leave you to draw the conclusion that the nephilim story is most likely the remnant of generations of oral recounting of truly ancient history.
Expedite Your Imminent Demise. Or Die Trying!

Writer
Posts: 40
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2011 1:33 am

PostWed Sep 21, 2011 12:24 pm » by Khnumkhufu


Not sure I would trust my bible into the hands of this guy, King James said no to a lot of things...

Have you not reason then to bee ashamed, and to forbeare this filthie noveltie, so basely grounded, so foolishly received and so grossely mistaken in the right use thereof? In your abuse thereof sinning against God, harming your selves both in persons and goods, and raking also thereby the markes and notes of vanitie upon you: by the custome thereof making your selves to be wondered at by all forraine civil Nations, and by all strangers that come among you, to be scorned and contemned. A custome lothsome to the eye, hatefull to the Nose, harmefull to the braine, dangerous to the Lungs, and in the blacke stinking fume thereof, neerest resembling the horrible Stigian smoke of the pit that is bottomelesse.


...of course when people say these things today, it's because it has been proven ;)

-as for the good king himself, he obviously did not have reason to be ashamed for taxing the shit out of the stuff. And IIRC james was a mason. (Note to self: do more research on those big pharma logos)

Conspirator
Posts: 1082
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 11:34 pm

PostWed Sep 21, 2011 1:03 pm » by Cia212


I've always considered the idea of some kind of human-demon hybrid to be theologically impossible. But it's a very popular theory among protestants.

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 2623
Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2009 12:10 pm
Location: Neutral Zone

PostWed Sep 21, 2011 2:53 pm » by Svaha


otoel wrote:
svaha wrote:Also known as the queen James version.


Wachu talking aboot you godam blasphemer??!!

LOL How you doing mang?


:lol: Doing great mang
Follow your bliss(ters) - Joseph Campbell

Next
  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

We are listed at the www.topparanormalsites.com website. Click here to vote for us.. Thank you :-)