Bill o'Reilly says if you bomb Iran it will start WW3
- Mrmcnuggets

-
- Posts: 3911
- Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 8:21 pm
constabul wrote:On a side note, we really should have a survival, guns and gear section on the site.
Doms sig.
This is a conspiriacy site, needs to stay that way.
Just imagine some of the topics that would be in the survival section here.

"There he goes. One of God's own prototypes. A high-powered mutant of some kind never even considered for mass production. Too weird to live, and too rare to die. "
I AM an endangered species.
I AM an endangered species.
Wow! Bill O' Reilly actually said something realistic and none TV?
Looks like Ol' Bill must be having a coming to Jesus
............."Jesus"

Looks like Ol' Bill must be having a coming to Jesus
............."Jesus"

*View my post history under former usernames: JetXVII, Epicfailure, Slamgunshark*
DJ Jesus died for your Spins!
debunkerace wrote:[youtube]ykG29YoC3o8&feature=plcp&context=C32ea567UDOEgsToPDskLhDxyoaD2jy7RXmoO4vCTk[/youtube]
Very interesting. If the military industrial complex has this sort of hold on the media then the only hope we have is full scale revolution. These peaceful rallies are nothing more than a weekend picnic, but at least they could be used to raise awareness.
ATHEISM:
The belief there was once absolutely nothing. Nothing happened to the nothing until the nothing exploded into everything. Then all of the exploded everything rearranged itself, into self-replicating bits which turned into dinosaurs.
The belief there was once absolutely nothing. Nothing happened to the nothing until the nothing exploded into everything. Then all of the exploded everything rearranged itself, into self-replicating bits which turned into dinosaurs.
Let's say Israel alone attacked Iran, an Israeli operation supported by the States, or even an outright attack by the US. To be a world war doesn't it mean other countries have to get involved? If they didn't, then it wouldn't be a world war.
Shouldn't you apply the mentality of let so and so fight their own battles apply to Iran also? If the US did attack Iran and the world got involved. Shouldn't the "World War" blame be placed at the feet of everyone else that got involved?
After all, if some countries want to duke it out for whatever reason. What business is it of everyone else? That's the logic many here use about Israel attacking Iran and the US getting involved. So why isn't the same logic applied to everyone else, instead of only being applied to Israel and the US?
Shouldn't you apply the mentality of let so and so fight their own battles apply to Iran also? If the US did attack Iran and the world got involved. Shouldn't the "World War" blame be placed at the feet of everyone else that got involved?
After all, if some countries want to duke it out for whatever reason. What business is it of everyone else? That's the logic many here use about Israel attacking Iran and the US getting involved. So why isn't the same logic applied to everyone else, instead of only being applied to Israel and the US?
rydher wrote:Let's say Israel alone attacked Iran, an Israeli operation supported by the States, or even an outright attack by the US. To be a world war doesn't it mean other countries have to get involved? If they didn't, then it wouldn't be a world war.
Shouldn't you apply the mentality of let so and so fight their own battles apply to Iran also? If the US did attack Iran and the world got involved. Shouldn't the "World War" blame be placed at the feet of everyone else that got involved?
After all, if some countries want to duke it out for whatever reason. What business is it of everyone else? That's the logic many here use about Israel attacking Iran and the US getting involved. So why isn't the same logic applied to everyone else, instead of only being applied to Israel and the US?
That logic allowed the Nazis to walk into France
I am aware it's often a thankless task persuading someone on a forum that they are mistaken. They are often, in the true sense of the word, bigots!
noentry wrote:rydher wrote:Let's say Israel alone attacked Iran, an Israeli operation supported by the States, or even an outright attack by the US. To be a world war doesn't it mean other countries have to get involved? If they didn't, then it wouldn't be a world war.
Shouldn't you apply the mentality of let so and so fight their own battles apply to Iran also? If the US did attack Iran and the world got involved. Shouldn't the "World War" blame be placed at the feet of everyone else that got involved?
After all, if some countries want to duke it out for whatever reason. What business is it of everyone else? That's the logic many here use about Israel attacking Iran and the US getting involved. So why isn't the same logic applied to everyone else, instead of only being applied to Israel and the US?
That logic allowed the Nazis to walk into France
So what's your problem with the US fighting with Israel against Iran? After all, that logic allowed the Nazi's to walk into France. Right?
The misunderstanding you have is,
it is American administration who are acting like the Nazis
it is American administration who are acting like the Nazis
I am aware it's often a thankless task persuading someone on a forum that they are mistaken. They are often, in the true sense of the word, bigots!
noentry wrote:The misunderstanding you have is,
it is American administration who are acting like the Nazis
Ahh, I see. So it's the Americans that are saying to kill all Jews and to annihilate Israel. Gotcha.
You still avoided my point. It wouldn't be a world war of the world didn't get involved in the war.
-
- Related topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- Bill O'Reilly..Very Funny Video
by liberal » Sat Oct 03, 2009 5:01 am - 5 Replies
- 274 Views
- Last post by flecktarn

Sat Oct 03, 2009 9:12 pm
- Bill O'Reilly..Very Funny Video
-
- Bill O'Reilly attacks 9/11 victim's son
by abyssdnb » Tue Dec 06, 2011 12:26 pm - 0 Replies
- 155 Views
- Last post by abyssdnb

Tue Dec 06, 2011 12:26 pm
- Bill O'Reilly attacks 9/11 victim's son
-
- Bill O'Reilly discussing 9/11, whoopi + joy walk off stage.
by abyssdnb » Sat Oct 16, 2010 8:43 pm - 2 Replies
- 207 Views
- Last post by punjedi

Sat Oct 16, 2010 9:18 pm
- Bill O'Reilly discussing 9/11, whoopi + joy walk off stage.
-
- VIDEO Ron Paul 2012: And The Idiocracy Of Bill O'Reilly
1, 2, 3by tragedyandhopes » Fri Sep 09, 2011 8:32 pm - 20 Replies
- 368 Views
- Last post by kkris

Sun Sep 11, 2011 10:25 pm
- VIDEO Ron Paul 2012: And The Idiocracy Of Bill O'Reilly
-
- Bill O'Reilly believes Ron Paul Hurting is Libertarians..
by tragedyandhopes » Wed Oct 05, 2011 11:28 am - 4 Replies
- 102 Views
- Last post by tragedyandhopes

Wed Oct 05, 2011 1:04 pm
- Bill O'Reilly believes Ron Paul Hurting is Libertarians..






