Bizarre UFO Photographed From Small Plane Over Oregon
36 posts
• Page 4 of 4 • 1, 2, 3, 4
- Flipper999

- Posts: 370
- Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 9:22 am
- Location: Australia
You might like:
The thing that gets me he said it passed them, now according to my aeronautical background. This craft is simply flying in reverse of its aerodynamic structure. If that makes sense.
- Seahawk100

-
- Posts: 3943
- Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 8:03 am
- Location: FEMA SECTOR 3
I knew it.

Lmao. Back off? Back off? phfftttt.
A little touchy there, bud? I was just chiding you, will. I thought you were thicker skinned then that. Mybad. Jumping to conclusions, though, is a little premature, don't you think? if you wanna call what I said being "picky," that's fine, but when you say something like "that clue says it all." sounds like jumping to conclusions to me. I'll "back off," but you "lighten up, Francis."
I had the impression that you were picky, too- like in your great "Space Anomalies" thread. I thought that was a good thing- in making assessments such as these. Again, mybad.
humble apologies


Lmao. Back off? Back off? phfftttt.
A little touchy there, bud? I was just chiding you, will. I thought you were thicker skinned then that. Mybad. Jumping to conclusions, though, is a little premature, don't you think? if you wanna call what I said being "picky," that's fine, but when you say something like "that clue says it all." sounds like jumping to conclusions to me. I'll "back off," but you "lighten up, Francis." I had the impression that you were picky, too- like in your great "Space Anomalies" thread. I thought that was a good thing- in making assessments such as these. Again, mybad.
humble apologies
RON PAUL 2012

All truths are easy to understand, once they are discovered. The point, is to discover them.-
Galileo Galilei
seahawk100 wrote:I knew it.
Lmao. Back off? Back off? phfftttt.A little touchy there, bud? I was just chiding you, will. I thought you were thicker skinned then that. Mybad. Jumping to conclusions, though, is a little premature, don't you think? if you wanna call what I said being "picky," that's fine, but when you say something like "that clue says it all." sounds like jumping to conclusions to me. I'll "back off," but you "lighten up, Francis."
![]()
I had the impression that you were picky, too- like in your great "Space Anomalies" thread. I thought that was a good thing- in making assessments such as these. Again, mybad.
humble apologies![]()
![]()
![]()

- Will69ease

-
- Posts: 6880
- Joined: Sun May 02, 2010 11:32 pm
seahawk100 wrote:I knew it.
Lmao. Back off? Back off? phfftttt.A little touchy there, bud? I was just chiding you, will. I thought you were thicker skinned then that. Mybad. Jumping to conclusions, though, is a little premature, don't you think? if you wanna call what I said being "picky," that's fine, but when you say something like "that clue says it all." sounds like jumping to conclusions to me. I'll "back off," but you "lighten up, Francis."
![]()
I had the impression that you were picky, too- like in your great "Space Anomalies" thread. I thought that was a good thing- in making assessments such as these. Again, mybad.
humble apologies![]()
![]()
![]()
I was a little touchy too so my humble apology back.

will69ease wrote:flipper999 wrote:By the speed it is traveling the object would be above the wing by the time another photo was taken. Don't forget you have a closure speed of at least 400knots. The pilot probably didn't have time for a third picture.
Look at the picture Marduk2012 posted of this plane. Now guess where the pilot sits.
Eventually, the ufo would be in front of the wing, and plane. Perfect spot to take a third, if not forth picture.
Well said. And the apparent movement of the plane along the ground features could be just a perspective change from applying rudder...meaning these pictures aren't necessarily in the correct order. In other words the object could be stationary and the plane is flying past it - not being passed by it.
Doesn't it look like smoke or a marker? We know this plane is used for equipment testing and was used for astronaut training, so couldn't this just be a location marker?
Presently, satellite technology company Row 44 uses an HU-16B Albatross (registration "N44HQ")[4] to test their in-flight satellite broadband internet service. Purchased, restored and named Albatross One in 2008, the company selected this aircraft for its operations because it has the same curvature atop its fuselage as the Boeing 737 aircraft which the company manufacturers its equipment for. The aircraft. The plane purchased by Row 44 was used at one time as a training aircraft for space shuttle astronauts by NASA. It features the autographs of the astronauts who trained aboard the plane on one of the cabin walls.
36 posts
• Page 4 of 4 • 1, 2, 3, 4
-
- Related topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- Croatia: UFO incident involving small plane, photo
by bugmenot » Thu May 14, 2009 1:11 am - 1 Replies
- 138 Views
- Last post by spruces21

Thu May 14, 2009 1:45 am
- Croatia: UFO incident involving small plane, photo
-
- Plane and UFO Photographed over Westbury?
1, 2by bugmenot » Mon Aug 03, 2009 1:58 am - 13 Replies
- 480 Views
- Last post by maleman

Mon Aug 03, 2009 9:19 am
- Plane and UFO Photographed over Westbury?
-
- UFO Photographed from Plane in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
1, 2by kris75 » Sat Jul 24, 2010 9:44 pm - 17 Replies
- 1453 Views
- Last post by kris75

Sat Sep 18, 2010 11:45 pm
- UFO Photographed from Plane in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
-
- 4 UFOs PHOTOGRAPHED FROM AN AIR FRANCE PLANE - 21 AUG 2011 !
by kris75 » Sun Sep 18, 2011 8:16 pm - 2 Replies
- 282 Views
- Last post by kris75

Sun Sep 18, 2011 10:01 pm
- 4 UFOs PHOTOGRAPHED FROM AN AIR FRANCE PLANE - 21 AUG 2011 !
-
- UFOs photographed from a plane over France 21-Aug-2011
by lightbringer » Wed Sep 21, 2011 2:59 pm - 0 Replies
- 239 Views
- Last post by lightbringer

Wed Sep 21, 2011 2:59 pm
- UFOs photographed from a plane over France 21-Aug-2011





