Breaking news: Rebels admit gas attack result of mishandling

Initiate
User avatar
Posts: 861
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 11:36 pm

PostSat Aug 31, 2013 3:04 pm » by Domeika


Please spread this around....and nail a copy to obozo's effing forehead...

Source: http://www.examiner.com/article/breaking-news-rebels-admit-gas-attack-result-of-mishandling-chemical-weapons

Text of article:

In a report that is sure to be considered blockbuster news, the rebels told Dale Gavlak, a reporter who has written for the Associated Press, NPR and BBC, they are responsible for the chemical attack last week.

Gavlak is a Middle Eastern journalist who filed the report about the rebels claiming responsibility on the Mint Press News website, which is affiliated with AP.

In that report allegedly the rebels told him the chemical attack was a result of mishandling chemical weapons.

This news should deflate the accusations, against the Assad regime, coming from the U.S., Britain, and France as well as the Arab League.

Since the chemical attacks last week, the Assad government was immediately blamed. On Monday, Secretary of State John Kerry said: That Assad’s guilt was “a judgment already clear to the world," according to theguardian.com.

As a result of Assad's government being blamed for the chemical attacks, five U.S. warships are now stationed off Syria's coast. These destroyers are poised to deliver cruise missiles in a strike that is due to begin any time now. According to the report on Mint Press there have been several interviews conducted with people in Damascus and Ghouta, a suburb of the Syrian capital.

The interviews conducted of residents, rebels and their families in Damascus and Ghouta are painting a different picture of what actually happened. Many believe that rebels received chemical weapons provided through the Saudi intelligence chief, Prince Bandar bin Sultan. It's being reported that these weapons are responsible for last week's gas attack.

The father of a rebel who was killed in what's now being called an accident by many in Ghouta and Damascus said: "My son came to me two weeks ago asking what I thought the weapons were that he had been asked to carry,” said Abu Abdel-Moneim. The father said at least 12 rebels including his son were killed by the chemical weapons.

Allegedly they were killed in the tunnel that was used to store the chemicals. These were provided by a Saudi militant, known as Abu Ayesha. He is said to be leading a fighting battalion in the effort to unseat Assad. The weapon was described as a "tube-like structure" by Abdel-Moneim.

Gavlak reports he was told by rebels that the gas "attack" was the result of rebels mishandling the chemical weapons they acquired from the Saudis. He says in the Mint Press report the following:

"They didn’t tell us what these arms were or how to use them,” complained a female fighter named ‘K.’ “We didn’t know they were chemical weapons. We never imagined they were chemical weapons.”

When Saudi Prince Bandar gives such weapons to people, he must give them to those who know how to handle and use them,” she warned. She, like other Syrians, do not want to use their full names for fear of retribution."

Gavlak continues in his report: "A well-known rebel leader in Ghouta named ‘J’ agreed. “Jabhat al-Nusra militants do not cooperate with other rebels, except with fighting on the ground. They do not share secret information. They merely used some ordinary rebels to carry and operate this material.

We were very curious about these arms. And unfortunately, some of the fighters handled the weapons improperly and set off the explosions, ‘J’ said."

The humanitarian agency, Doctors Without Borders, reported that around 355 people had died from what was believed to be a neurotoxic agent. They reportedly treated 3,600 people with symptoms of, frothing at the mouth, respiratory distress, convulsions and blurry vision.

According to the report dozens of rebels said they were receiving salaries from the Saudis.

It's said that Bandar was educated in the U.S. both military and collegiate. He is also said to have "served as a highly influential Saudi Ambassador to the U.S., and the CIA totally loves this guy."

Prince Bandar's intelligence agency is said to have been the first to bring allegations that Assad's regime used Sarin gas in Feb.

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 2382
Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2012 9:16 am

PostSat Aug 31, 2013 3:19 pm » by mediasorcery


hmmmm, i think they should be attacked with tomahawk missiles for this heinous human rights violation= so what else is lies then, we were told they had proof asshead did it?

i wonder how far this report will go in msm, if its true? so they were going to gas asshead, but it bakfired, hmmmm. unbelievable.

there has been a protest of syrians here in aus to stop obamsshole from killing more with strikes, the syrian people dont want 'rebels-alqaeda' ruling there country, they want asshead, thats the message.
the story of life is quicker than the blink of an eye, the story of love is hello and goodbye, until we meet again my friend.

Master Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 10178
Joined: Sun May 20, 2012 3:24 pm

PostSat Aug 31, 2013 3:39 pm » by *WillEase*


If the accident happened in one town, I would consider this. But the attack happened in twelve towns...
accident my ass.
PEACE, PEACE...BUT THERE IS NO PEACE!

Super Moderator
User avatar
Posts: 15836
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 7:12 pm

PostSat Aug 31, 2013 4:20 pm » by Spock


*WillEase* wrote:If the accident happened in one town, I would consider this. But the attack happened in twelve towns...
accident my ass.



I don't believe that is the point, accident, yea, not only debatable, highly improbable - but the main point being that the "rebels" claimed responsibility - sort of takes the winds out of Obama's sails to justify an attack on Assad.

Oh what a beautiful morning!

If Obama moves forward, it should erase any doubt that there has never been a president so deserving of impeachment, except to brain dead minions that still hawk the argument that to oppose him is to be racist.

Initiate
User avatar
Posts: 338
Joined: Sat Jun 15, 2013 5:50 pm

PostSat Aug 31, 2013 4:50 pm » by handy4321


Perhaps our Will is privy to information he can share with us all that is NOT classified "Top Secret" for reasons of national security. Come on, spill the beans. Just as I thought. Your OPINION does not constitute proof any more than Obummer's or any one else's. The majority of the people here do NOT believe that the Assad government was behind this. Your side lost this round! The good guys win for a change. :owned:

Initiate
Posts: 500
Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2009 2:29 am

PostSat Aug 31, 2013 4:50 pm » by Pateriot


So... the poison gas attacks went off too early; In the wrong direction; downwind from the wrong people? At the very least this proves that the "rebels" (terrorist Muslim Brotherhood) possess chemical weapons and are planning to use them!!! Yet, when they go off this National Socialist administration and its propaganda cabinet (the MSM) won't even entertain the notion that it was anyone accept Assad!

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 3141
Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2009 12:10 pm
Location: Neutral Zone

PostSat Aug 31, 2013 5:12 pm » by Svaha


Bandar Bush, that should ring a bell.
Follow your bliss(ters) - Joseph Campbell

Initiate
User avatar
Posts: 338
Joined: Sat Jun 15, 2013 5:50 pm

PostSat Aug 31, 2013 7:08 pm » by handy4321


Washington Post: Military Has Doubts About Syria Strike


Active-duty military leaders said they feel strongly that a strike in Syria would serve no purpose for the U.S./quote]

Conservatives have denounced a possible Syrian attack as an "impeachable act," especially if the president goes against Congress.

"President Obama is usurping the authority of the Congress first and foremost, and he appears about to launch an unconstitutional and unnecessary war," political commentator Pat Buchanan told Newsmax TV Thursday./quote]

"If the president launched an unnecessary and unconstitutional war, striking a country against whom we have not declared war and has not attacked us, that is de facto an impeachable act that could lead to an open-ended war, the consequences of which we cannot even see."


Link; http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/military-uneasy-syria-strike/2013/08/30/id/523141

Initiate
Posts: 330
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2013 5:28 am

PostSun Sep 01, 2013 3:08 pm » by grimghost



Upload to Disclose.tv



Syrians in the Damascus suburb of Ghouta say Saudi Arabia provided chemical weapons for an al-Qaeda linked terrorist group which they blame for the August 21 chemical attack in the region, a Mint Press News report says.



  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post
Visit Disclose.tv on Facebook