By Law NASA Is NOT Allowed To Tell You The Truth !

Wed Mar 09, 2011 4:16 pm » by **Boondox681**

modern science is a joke.why?
religion.
in a nutshell,if science can't come up with an answer,the religions will say..god did it.
well,fuck.we can't have that.so science puts out these 'answers'...no matter how absurd or ridiculous,
(see michau kaku).
as long as man is stuck in this paradigm,we will never advance spiritually or scientifically.
and science loses all it's credibility,as it is right now.
peace

Wed Mar 09, 2011 4:25 pm » by **Ademu**

boondox681 wrote:modern science is a joke.why?
religion.
in a nutshell,if science can't come up with an answer,the religions will say..god did it.
well,fuck.we can't have that.so science puts out these 'answers'...no matter how absurd or ridiculous,
(see michau kaku).
as long as man is stuck in this paradigm,we will never advance spiritually or scientifically.
and science loses all it's credibility,as it is right now.
peace

I'm in total agreement with you here, with the exception to Dr. Kaku. I'm not sure what your beef with him is, but that man is a fucking genius. Dude built an atom smasher in his garage @ 16. String field theory seems way the fuck out there, but as far as I've found it does the best job in main-stream science of unifying all the underlying disciplines in physics into one small linear equation(granted that equation hasn't been found yet). Don't demonize an entire field because certain parties control the flow of information.

Wed Mar 09, 2011 4:57 pm » by **Boondox681**

I'm in total agreement with you here, with the exception to Dr. Kaku. I'm not sure what your beef with him is, but that man is a fucking genius. Dude built an atom smasher in his garage @ 16. String field theory seems way the fuck out there, but as far as I've found it does the best job in main-stream science of unifying all the underlying disciplines in physics into one small linear equation(granted that equation hasn't been found yet). Don't demonize an entire field because certain parties control the flow of information.

genius.does not impress me when the man is a bold faced liar.
i'm not demonizing shit.they and their lies are.
example.kaku sat on national tv and said that the mystery missile was a contrail and it was an optical illusion.WTF?this is the best that the smartest man on the planet can come up with?
how about the birds.this fuckin' liar stood proudly and said it was FIREWORKS.
i watched both interviews live.

soooo,if he has to lie when he doesn't know the answers,what the fuck else is he lying about?
fuck that.you can believe a liar if you want.
once a liar,always a liar.period.

Wed Mar 09, 2011 5:23 pm » by **Ademu**

boondox681 wrote:
I'm in total agreement with you here, with the exception to Dr. Kaku. I'm not sure what your beef with him is, but that man is a fucking genius. Dude built an atom smasher in his garage @ 16. String field theory seems way the fuck out there, but as far as I've found it does the best job in main-stream science of unifying all the underlying disciplines in physics into one small linear equation(granted that equation hasn't been found yet). Don't demonize an entire field because certain parties control the flow of information.

genius.does not impress me when the man is a bold faced liar.
i'm not demonizing shit.they and their lies are.
example.kaku sat on national tv and said that the mystery missile was a contrail and it was an optical illusion.WTF?this is the best that the smartest man on the planet can come up with?
how about the birds.this fuckin' liar stood proudly and said it was FIREWORKS.
i watched both interviews live.

soooo,if he has to lie when he doesn't know the answers,what the fuck else is he lying about?
fuck that.you can believe a liar if you want.
once a liar,always a liar.period.

While I am not familiar with either interview, based on my years of following his work and research, I am sure he was merely postulating theories based on accepted scientific models. Besides that, giving interviews for morning shows or news opinion shows probably wouldn't be the best platform for unveiling any groundbreaking or controversial theories. He was more than likely wrong on both issues and he would be the first to tell you that, but just because his off the cuff theory on a strange phenomnea may be wrong doesn't immediately make him a liiar.

Wed Mar 09, 2011 5:27 pm » by **Marduk2012**

The 1958 Space Act states that the public will be informed regarding results of space photos and data only if it is determined that suit data are not a threat and that for example the gargantuan EMVs found by Dr. Norman Bergrun in the rings of Saturn would have been considered a threat and deemed to have great military significance.

Wed Mar 09, 2011 5:29 pm » by **Ademu**

marduk2012 wrote:The 1958 Space Act states that the public will be informed regarding results of space photos and data only if it is determined that suit data are not a threat and that for example the gargantuan EMVs found by Dr. Norman Bergrun in the rings of Saturn would have been considered a threat and deemed to have great military significance.

Do you know if there is a similar act in regards to scientific discoveries in general?

Wed Mar 09, 2011 5:45 pm » by **Boondox681**

While I am not familiar with either interview, based on my years of following his work and research, I am sure he was merely postulating theories based on accepted scientific models. Besides that, giving interviews for morning shows or news opinion shows probably wouldn't be the best platform for unveiling any groundbreaking or controversial theories. He was more than likely wrong on both issues and he would be the first to tell you that, but just because his off the cuff theory on a strange phenomnea may be wrong doesn't immediately make him a liiar.

listen,pay attention.HE IS THE MOUTHPIECE FOR THE ILLIMINATI.
they didn't have him on to discuss a groundbreaking theory,they PUT HIM OUT because people like you believe him!!!!
over the past year,when any true discovery has been made,it was the nasa scientists bringing this info to the public,not michau 'the clown' kaku.
if your a legitimate ANYTHING,you don't announce speculation on any info as if it's the truth.
that's exactly what he did/does
sooo,guess what?he was wrong on both issues.
where's his apology?

dude,snap out of it.you've been lied to for years.

peace

Wed Mar 09, 2011 6:17 pm » by **Stratafire**

NASA has lost it's mantra as a protector of the Civilian desire for space exploration since they were in on the JFK assassination (Government projects pay more then Civilian grants ever do) http://www.nasaimages.org/luna/servlet/detail/nasaNAS~5~5~24340~127725:XECF

We have had Nuclear engines for quite awhile now, and are fully reduced in size to a satellite model, and refined beyond normal civilian awareness (the project went black when the technology reached the 100 monkey level in the late 60's)

NASA has had plasma engines, Ion engines, and other exotics since the 60's, and anything of value that comes along, they develop two bases for it, the civilian application (the cash cow which is smoke and mirrors technology, heavily dirtied up and made long winded in terms of development) and the Black funded side of the project, which is the major goal of NASA, and takes precedence over any and all other civilian projects..

NASA has been lying from almost "Day One"...

Wed Mar 09, 2011 6:40 pm » by **The57ironman**

what else is new...?

Wed Mar 09, 2011 6:50 pm » by **Ademu**

boondox681 wrote:listen,pay attention.HE IS THE MOUTHPIECE FOR THE ILLIMINATI.
they didn't have him on to discuss a groundbreaking theory,they PUT HIM OUT because people like you believe him!!!!
over the past year,when any true discovery has been made,it was the nasa scientists bringing this info to the public,not michau 'the clown' kaku.
if your a legitimate ANYTHING,you don't announce speculation on any info as if it's the truth.
that's exactly what he did/does
sooo,guess what?he was wrong on both issues.
where's his apology?

dude,snap out of it.you've been lied to for years.

peace

Dude most advanced science is speculation, I couldn't even tell you the last time a true "law" of physics was found, at this point most experiments are modeled after various theories. Everyday scientist publish/review/disprove new theories, it's at the core of the proffession. Presenting a theory as a universal truth is wrong, but speculating on that theory based on evidence is perfectly fine. Whether he is lying is up to the individual to determine, his journals, papers, and books are all published and freely available for review by anyone who wishes to do so. If you think he is a quack, then the materials are there for you to prove him wrong.

That being said, I keep an open mind as I know that I know absolutely nothing. So if you could provide me some evidence or resources showing how I've been lied to i would be more than happy to review it and form my conclusion from there.