CHILD PORNAGRAPHY/its ok???

Initiate
User avatar
Posts: 219
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 7:44 am
Location: Tucson, Arizona, USA

PostThu Mar 25, 2010 4:22 am » by Papermoon


bayonetta wrote:Facinating........but sometimes i get to thinking that with the implimentation of this scanning tech...that they're searching for more than just terrorist.....this tech can probabally determine who's human and who's not.

...possibility.



OMG!!!Now THAT is an interesting thought! :flop: But yeah this whole thing bothers me, I never realized they were so detailed like that. Yeah I think they should exclude children under 18 I guess, or get rid of it all together. It's crazy. But no, I don't think these scanners are a good idea at all. If they do exclude minors, then terrorists will just kidnap children and force them to carry their weopons through the airport security, or use their own kids since they start brainwashing them from age of like 1yr old anyway. So they will just have to get rid of the scanners altogether and work on fine tuning the security we already have. :think:
~I Believe~
Tis strange but true, for truth is always strange, stranger than fiction.


Writer
Posts: 70
Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2010 6:36 pm

PostThu Mar 25, 2010 4:35 am » by Truthfiles2012


Very valid point about these scanners and children walking through them. It's is plain and simple child pornography but when the governments get to do it they receive a standing ovation.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hvM0M4fesdw

:think:

Initiate
User avatar
Posts: 219
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 7:44 am
Location: Tucson, Arizona, USA

PostThu Mar 25, 2010 4:36 am » by Papermoon


drabbit wrote:Body Scanners - Federal Jobs For Perverts
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZzgKtqJ4guI


Upload to Disclose.tv



these machines were made a long time ago
I guess they just had to make something HAPPEN so they could put them into place...
this whole thing was a PLAN a long time ago
all about money and control
they dont give a shit about our rights
they dont give a shit what any of us say



Yeah I bet all of the perverts will kill themselves trying to all flock to get a job as an airport screaner now, just like how perverts flock to certain other kinds of jobs. :shock:
~I Believe~
Tis strange but true, for truth is always strange, stranger than fiction.


Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 2946
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2010 7:23 pm
Location: The beach

PostThu Mar 25, 2010 5:19 am » by Torofamily


toro wrote
fossileyesed good rant. I also have loved ones who have suffered. My heart goes out to the victims. Anybody who victimizes another human being deserves punishment but someone who victimizes a child doesn't deserve to have the state feed and house them.
I totally support capital punishment in those cases or even better vigilantism :sunny:

boondox681, rabbit, truthfiles and papermoon thanks for the post and all good points :flop:



bayonetta
what a silly little code :rtft:
:shock: :shock: :shock:

lucidlemondrop
Didn't know it to be a code, Bayonetta, but if you have the cipher please do share! :flop:

it aint worth it, laugh it off, if it dont apply let it fly :sunny:
ImageWE ARE THE GLOBAL POLITICAL AWAKENING ! Image

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 8431
Joined: Sat May 30, 2009 7:37 am

PostThu Mar 25, 2010 5:50 am » by Lucidlemondrop


Thank You

Image
What a long strange trip it's been..............

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 2946
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2010 7:23 pm
Location: The beach

PostThu Mar 25, 2010 6:15 am » by Torofamily


lucidlemondrop wrote:Thank You






Image
ImageWE ARE THE GLOBAL POLITICAL AWAKENING ! Image

Initiate
User avatar
Posts: 219
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 7:44 am
Location: Tucson, Arizona, USA

PostThu Mar 25, 2010 9:43 am » by Papermoon


torofamily wrote:toro wrote
fossileyesed good rant. I also have loved ones who have suffered. My heart goes out to the victims. Anybody who victimizes another human being deserves punishment but someone who victimizes a child doesn't deserve to have the state feed and house them.
I totally support capital punishment in those cases or even better vigilantism :sunny:

boondox681, rabbit, truthfiles and papermoon thanks for the post and all good points :flop:



bayonetta
what a silly little code :rtft:
:shock: :shock: :shock:

lucidlemondrop
Didn't know it to be a code, Bayonetta, but if you have the cipher please do share! :flop:

it aint worth it, laugh it off, if it dont apply let it fly :sunny:



Thanks! I agree! I think all pedophiles should get the death penalty. Period. Doctors already realize they cannot reform them and make them normal, so what's the point. They deserve the death penalty.
Last edited by Papermoon on Thu Mar 25, 2010 9:45 am, edited 1 time in total.
~I Believe~
Tis strange but true, for truth is always strange, stranger than fiction.


Initiate
User avatar
Posts: 219
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 7:44 am
Location: Tucson, Arizona, USA

PostThu Mar 25, 2010 9:44 am » by Papermoon


lucidlemondrop wrote:Thank You

Image


That's pretty! :sunny:
~I Believe~
Tis strange but true, for truth is always strange, stranger than fiction.


Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 2244
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2009 11:56 am

PostThu Mar 25, 2010 10:55 am » by Iwanci


I must have missed the point on this topic… how did it go from body scanners to pedophiles? I will give my boring 2 cents worth on both topics.

The biggest issue on the body scanners IMO is not the pedophilic aspect, rather it is the taking away of civil liberties and human dignity, but why? Please read on.

If they can convince us that they are for our own good then we will accept them. These scanners are said to increase airline security, maybe they will, more eyes on more people will also achieve the same security increase, simple. But why the scanners?

Pedophiles: Unfortunately the creeps of society have been around us and our children in various hidden ways since before we even knew who or what these animals were, I think 1000’s of years, in some societies it was common and acceptable to have child sex workers, so at some stage these creeps behaviour was acceptable. Scanners will not exacerbate the problem, the problem manifests itself with or without scanners. We cannot prevent the scum of the earth from re-offending unless society does something more than the current system of placing a prison term on a crime. "Do the crime do the time" should not apply here, this system places a value on these crimes, as we all know these are not crimes they are abuses which are far worse than any crime, and no value can be placed on them. "Do the crime and you will never have the chance to repeat the same crime" should be the message. Unfortunately, I believe that rape and abuse statistics show that you are more likely to be abused or raped by someone you know and/or trust rather than some random person. The random animal does exist and does unfortunately rear its disgusting head, we hear about these cases in the press, it’s the ones we don’t hear about unfortunately that worry me the most, as most are never reported. I believe society should do more to protect the innocent. How about chemical castration? How about life in prison? How about both?

Last week here in Melbourne a convicted aggravated serial rapist, a know re-offender, an animal who was living in a secure house (under monitored supervision) was being escorted (by a prison officer) to a doctors appointment. Along the way the two decided that they should stop for a coffee at a café. The convicted rapist excused himself from the table whilst he went to the bathroom, sometime later the prison officer realized that the offender had absconded (like we have never seen this scenario in a movie? How dumb was the prison officer?) What made this worse was that this was not the first time the rapist had escaped from custody. Luckily they caught the scumbag a couple of days later, but what if this imbecile re-offended whilst he was out? So many questions that need to be asked on this case alone. These offenders also have the right to anonymity, they are afforded protection and a name change when they are let out of prison. The general public is not allowed to know where these people are now living. Does this sound like a fair society? Probably so if you are the offender.

Another story that made the press is that of a convicted child abuser who has sworn that she is craving to kill a child. She has served her prison sentence for her abuse crime and, although the judge fears for the safety of children, although the system acknowledges that she is very likely to re-offend, there is nothing they can do to keep her locked up. The problem is as much the system as the offender. Maybe hold the judges accountable if the criminals re-offend? Let's see how many will be let out if this was the case.

So, IMO, the link between the scanners and the pedophiles is much weaker, what we should be doing is questioning society’s answer to the pedophile issue per se.

With regards to the scanners, when was the last time someone hijacked a plane with explosives, and blew it up? Or took hostages with guns? These instances have happened but they are far and few in between. I do a lot of air travel, I must be honest, I often think… “if I was a terrorist, what could I use… hmmm, steel cutlery I notice a knife, a fork, a glass, a wine bottle, hmmm a bracelet with sharpened concealed edges, let’s face it, 9/11 hijackers had box cutters (apparently) not guns not explosives… so the big question here is why the hell do we need the scanners.. And also, if I was a terrorist and security at the airport was too much….hmmm why not an ocean liner? A bridge? A train? A petrol tanker on the ground could be just as lethal I imagine.. anyone seen any movies lately?

Yet again, i believe we need to follow the money for the answers. Let us look at the local supermarkets. Here in Oz we have a prolific growth of self serve scanners in our stores… what do these do? They afford us the consumer a time saving…hmmm they also save business big money. I believe the bigger intention with the airport scanners is to introduce them, get people used to them, then decrease the paid security force, this of course adds up to huge cost savings no more no less. I think that is as complicated as the agenda gets, and of course who is pushing for these, would it be perhaps the manufacturers of the scanners? Just look at how much additional money is being spent on airline security since 9/11 if I was in business I would be asking “how do I claw these costs back without making people feel less secure?

My opinion only of course.
Fortes fortuna iuvat

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 2951
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 10:50 pm
Location: 2 Thirds Down The Bottle

PostThu Mar 25, 2010 11:56 am » by Toxic32


The problem with these scanners is that they give a false sense of security, if you can't hide it on your body then hide it in your body you don't need much C4 plastic explosive to make a big bang (no pun intended)and it's easy to mold into any shape so that it can be inserted into body. So there's no point in doing a surface scan unless you do a full Xray scan as well? makes you think don't it,,,The next time you sit next to the women with the big breast you might get more than you bargained for. :mrgreen:
I question everything. I don't believe anything I'm told or anything I see. Prove it, or fuck off. And that's not me I see in the mirror in the morning.


PreviousNext

  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post
Visit Disclose.tv on Facebook