complaint filed to remove Obummer from the Ballot in NH
When you buy halal products, you are financing inhumaely slaughter and torture of animals
Demand for emergency rehearing of the Ballot Law Commission complaint/election denial of challenge to candidate Barack Obama filed by attorney Dr. Orly Taitz and joined by 9 NH State Representatives, presidential candidate, veterans and other citizens, due to fraud committed by the members of the Ballot Law committee, their attorney and assistant Secretary of State of New Hampshire during the Committee hearing.
Dear Mr. Gardner,
according to Rules and Procedures of the Supreme Court of New Hampshire, plaintiff, contesting decision of the administrative agency, needs to demand a rehearing by the agency prior to filing an appeal of its’ decision to the Supreme Court:
RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
PROCEDURAL RULES 1 TO 34
Rule 10. Appeal from Administrative Agency.
”To appeal to the supreme court from an administrative agency under RSA 541, the appealing party must have timely filed for a rehearing with the administrative agency. See RSA 541:4 and Appeal of White Mountains Education Association, 125 N.H. 771 (1984). The time period for the appeal does not begin to run until the administrative agency has acted upon the motion.”
Attorney Orly Taitz provided Ballot Law Commission with a 85 page complaint showing that candidate Barack Hussein Obama, II,(hereinafter Obama), citizen of Great Britain, Kenya and Indonesia, is not a natural born citizen of the United States and does not possess valid US identification papers. in fact she provided you personally and the committee with affidavits and documents, that Mr. Obama is using in his tax returns and selective service certification a Connecticut Social Security number, which according to E-Verify and SSNVS was never assigned to Barak Obama. Additionally, she provided you with evidence showing Mr. Obama’s alleged true and correct copy of long form birth certificate, posted by Obama on WhiteHouse.gov, to be a cheap computer generated forgery, while the director of Health of the state of Hawaii is aiding and abetting Obama in obstruction of justice and is refusing inspection of the original birth certificate, allegedly on file.
Previously, on multiple occasions, both you and Ballot Law Commission, held substantive investigation into the background of the candidates and veracity of their statements and routinely removed from the ballot individuals, who are not eligible.(exhibit 1) As a matter of fact, a presidential candidate Sal Mohammad was removed from the ballot as ineligible during 2008 election season specificaly for not being a natural born citizen(Exhibit 2).
On November 18th, 2011, during the committee meeting, members of the committee and their attorney simply shameslessly lied and committed the most egregious fraud by claiming that they only check, whether the candidate filled the declaration correctly and paid $1,000. Mr. Gardner, you personally, and members of the committee and attorney of the committee are well aware of all of the mentioned precedents, and are well aware, that verification of the candidacy according to law does not have a narrow meaning of checking, if the form is filled out and the check is paid. It includes verification, whether the candidate is indeed a Natural Born citizen, and Mr. Obama is clearly not a natural born citizen. even if mr. Obama were to possess a valid US long form birth certificate and a valid Social Security number, which he doesn’t, he cannot be considered a natural born citizen, as per prior fuling of the Supreme court of the United States in minor v Happersett, natural born US citizen is one, who is born in the country to parents, who are citizens. Mr. Obama had foreign citizenship since birth, since his father, Barack Obama Sr. was a foreign national and according to British nationality act Mr. Obama was a British citizen from birth.
Additionally, in spite of multiple demands, Mr. Obama’s declaration of candidate filed in 2011, was not provided to the plaintiff, while his prior declaration does not contain necessary wording of a sworn declaration, as eligible according to Article 2, Section 1 of the US Constitution, which in itself is a cause for removal of the candidate from the ballot, if indeed such necessary wording is missing.
Due to egregious fraud committed by the attorney of the committee and 5 members, who were sited at the hearing on November 18th, there is sufficient ground for a rehearing.
Ballot law committee consists of 10 members. Due to fraud committed by 5 members, present at the meeting, plaintiffs are demanding a re-hearing with 5 other members, not the same 5 members, who were engaged in egregious fraud. Office of the Secretary of state is requested to not to allow at the rehearing the same attorney, who was maliciously misrepresenting the requirements in regards to eligibility of the candidate.
Just like Al Capone was finally convicted when a corrupted jury was replaced, the state of NH and the US will have legitimate elections as corrupted members of the committee and their attorney are replaced.
Wherefore plaintiff is requesting:
1. Secretary of State Gardner to reconsider his decision and remove candidate Barack Obama from the 2012 elections ballot due to the fact, that Obama is not a natural born US citizen.
2. If Secretary of State Gardner refuses to remove Obama from the ballot, plaintiff is requesting a rehearing with a new Ballot Law commission, with remaining 5 commission members, who were not sited during the November 18, 2011 hearing, due to the fact that 5 committee members, who were sited during the November 18 hearing engaged in egregious fraud.
3. Due to the fact, that three of the committee members are reported to be licensed attorneys, plaintiff is requesting the Secretary of state sue sponte to report them and their attorney to the New Hampshire bar for a disciplinary hearing due to fraud committed by officers of the court.
4. Plaintiff is requesting Secretary of State to report to the Merrimack county District Attorney and Grand Jury 5 members of the Ballot Law Commission: Mr. Cook, Ms. Van Oot, Mr. French, Ms. Clemmons and Ms. Moran, as well as their attorney and assistant Secretary of State Ms. Ladd for fraud committed during November 18, 2011 hearing, as well as for misprision of felonies and aiding and abetting felonies committed by candidate Obama, as well as for possible treason against the state of New Hampshire and the United States of America.
Dear Mr. Gardner,
according to Rules and Procedures of the Supreme Court of New Hampshire, plaintiff, contesting decision of the administrative agency, needs to demand a rehearing by the agency prior to filing an appeal of its’ decision to the Supreme Court:
RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
PROCEDURAL RULES 1 TO 34
Rule 10. Appeal from Administrative Agency.
”To appeal to the supreme court from an administrative agency under RSA 541, the appealing party must have timely filed for a rehearing with the administrative agency. See RSA 541:4 and Appeal of White Mountains Education Association, 125 N.H. 771 (1984). The time period for the appeal does not begin to run until the administrative agency has acted upon the motion.”
Attorney Orly Taitz provided Ballot Law Commission with a 85 page complaint showing that candidate Barack Hussein Obama, II,(hereinafter Obama), citizen of Great Britain, Kenya and Indonesia, is not a natural born citizen of the United States and does not possess valid US identification papers. in fact she provided you personally and the committee with affidavits and documents, that Mr. Obama is using in his tax returns and selective service certification a Connecticut Social Security number, which according to E-Verify and SSNVS was never assigned to Barak Obama. Additionally, she provided you with evidence showing Mr. Obama’s alleged true and correct copy of long form birth certificate, posted by Obama on WhiteHouse.gov, to be a cheap computer generated forgery, while the director of Health of the state of Hawaii is aiding and abetting Obama in obstruction of justice and is refusing inspection of the original birth certificate, allegedly on file.
Previously, on multiple occasions, both you and Ballot Law Commission, held substantive investigation into the background of the candidates and veracity of their statements and routinely removed from the ballot individuals, who are not eligible.(exhibit 1) As a matter of fact, a presidential candidate Sal Mohammad was removed from the ballot as ineligible during 2008 election season specificaly for not being a natural born citizen(Exhibit 2).
On November 18th, 2011, during the committee meeting, members of the committee and their attorney simply shameslessly lied and committed the most egregious fraud by claiming that they only check, whether the candidate filled the declaration correctly and paid $1,000. Mr. Gardner, you personally, and members of the committee and attorney of the committee are well aware of all of the mentioned precedents, and are well aware, that verification of the candidacy according to law does not have a narrow meaning of checking, if the form is filled out and the check is paid. It includes verification, whether the candidate is indeed a Natural Born citizen, and Mr. Obama is clearly not a natural born citizen. even if mr. Obama were to possess a valid US long form birth certificate and a valid Social Security number, which he doesn’t, he cannot be considered a natural born citizen, as per prior fuling of the Supreme court of the United States in minor v Happersett, natural born US citizen is one, who is born in the country to parents, who are citizens. Mr. Obama had foreign citizenship since birth, since his father, Barack Obama Sr. was a foreign national and according to British nationality act Mr. Obama was a British citizen from birth.
Additionally, in spite of multiple demands, Mr. Obama’s declaration of candidate filed in 2011, was not provided to the plaintiff, while his prior declaration does not contain necessary wording of a sworn declaration, as eligible according to Article 2, Section 1 of the US Constitution, which in itself is a cause for removal of the candidate from the ballot, if indeed such necessary wording is missing.
Due to egregious fraud committed by the attorney of the committee and 5 members, who were sited at the hearing on November 18th, there is sufficient ground for a rehearing.
Ballot law committee consists of 10 members. Due to fraud committed by 5 members, present at the meeting, plaintiffs are demanding a re-hearing with 5 other members, not the same 5 members, who were engaged in egregious fraud. Office of the Secretary of state is requested to not to allow at the rehearing the same attorney, who was maliciously misrepresenting the requirements in regards to eligibility of the candidate.
Just like Al Capone was finally convicted when a corrupted jury was replaced, the state of NH and the US will have legitimate elections as corrupted members of the committee and their attorney are replaced.
Wherefore plaintiff is requesting:
1. Secretary of State Gardner to reconsider his decision and remove candidate Barack Obama from the 2012 elections ballot due to the fact, that Obama is not a natural born US citizen.
2. If Secretary of State Gardner refuses to remove Obama from the ballot, plaintiff is requesting a rehearing with a new Ballot Law commission, with remaining 5 commission members, who were not sited during the November 18, 2011 hearing, due to the fact that 5 committee members, who were sited during the November 18 hearing engaged in egregious fraud.
3. Due to the fact, that three of the committee members are reported to be licensed attorneys, plaintiff is requesting the Secretary of state sue sponte to report them and their attorney to the New Hampshire bar for a disciplinary hearing due to fraud committed by officers of the court.
4. Plaintiff is requesting Secretary of State to report to the Merrimack county District Attorney and Grand Jury 5 members of the Ballot Law Commission: Mr. Cook, Ms. Van Oot, Mr. French, Ms. Clemmons and Ms. Moran, as well as their attorney and assistant Secretary of State Ms. Ladd for fraud committed during November 18, 2011 hearing, as well as for misprision of felonies and aiding and abetting felonies committed by candidate Obama, as well as for possible treason against the state of New Hampshire and the United States of America.
When you buy halal products, you are financing inhumaely slaughter and torture of animals
- Mediasorcerer

-
- Posts: 6314
- Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2009 4:06 pm
- Location: coast
If you throw enough mud, someday some of it will stick, hopefully.
with the power of soul,anything is possible
with the power of you,anything that you wanna do
with the power of you,anything that you wanna do
- Shaggietrip

-
- Posts: 2820
- Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 6:11 am
- Location: I am MEME
Same deal different state. Judge refuses to dis-miss. Trial set for Jan.



-
- Related topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- Obummer signs iran sanctions into law
by mediasorcerer » Sun Jan 01, 2012 11:54 am - 8 Replies
- 800 Views
- Last post by ironlikealion

Sun Jan 01, 2012 6:15 pm
- Obummer signs iran sanctions into law
-
- Only Two Republican Candidates on Virginia Ballot
by the57ironman » Wed Jan 18, 2012 3:02 am - 3 Replies
- 288 Views
- Last post by the57ironman

Wed Jan 18, 2012 3:19 am
- Only Two Republican Candidates on Virginia Ballot
-
- First criminal charges filed in BP oil spill
by Eldorado » Tue Apr 24, 2012 10:59 pm - 0 Replies
- 40 Views
- Last post by Eldorado

Tue Apr 24, 2012 10:59 pm
- First criminal charges filed in BP oil spill
-
- Eligibility Update: Swensson v. Soetoro Filed;
by volitzer » Sat Aug 22, 2009 5:11 am - 3 Replies
- 121 Views
- Last post by woodgod23

Sat Aug 22, 2009 6:19 am
- Eligibility Update: Swensson v. Soetoro Filed;
-
- Massive New Lawsuit Filed Against U.S. Federal Government
1, 2by earthspirit7 » Mon Jan 02, 2012 11:59 pm - 12 Replies
- 789 Views
- Last post by noentry

Tue Jan 03, 2012 3:48 am
- Massive New Lawsuit Filed Against U.S. Federal Government



