CONTROL

Mon Jul 23, 2012 8:10 am » by **Opalserpent**

Talking about control, I see here in Australia more and more talk about your gun laws on good old t.v. I didn't know we gave a shit but apparently we think you should hand your guns in like we did after martin bryant false flag.

I hope you are ready to hand your guns in because your hijacked usurped bought and paid for government must be scared shitless you will take your country back.

Might explain why they are buying millions of rounds of ammo and stock piling. They really want to take your guns away.

Mon Jul 23, 2012 9:30 am » by **Seriouscitizen**

Well, what i have to say about this is that i want to make my intention clear, I want to connect to people, empower myself by empowering others. Find love and use that energy to create and manifest my future in how i dream it to be.
I am a woman who chooses her words following my own set of rules and always try to be impeccable while talking and writing.

Like i said in my thread: the-4-toltec-insights-for-happines-t75032.html

Being impeccable with my words, don't take anything personal, don't make assumptions, always do my best.

So for now i will do my best in making the lurkers and participaters understand me. Because i have nothing to hide. I am not afraid to be "vulnerable" because there is no such thing as being that when you do your best, set your boundaries and have the right intentions.

I feel like i have to say this because i know i can be cryptic. I try to boil everything i KNOW=feel and think at the same time. Into words. That can be hard. And i don't want that due to somebody else his or her paranoia people will be afraid to resonate with me. Or dwell on my words for a bit.

Everything i say is MY opinion and it will only empower you if it already resonates with you. That's what i know.

If i was a long gamer, than i wouldn't say this to my opinion:

Thinking:
If your speed of thought is faster than that of your fellow human, you can predict what they will think/feel/act before they do it themself. Hence you have power over them!

Because than i would be giving my power over you away wont I?

Because if I use this knowledge against u and try to manipulate you because i know how people think and feel, and in some cases play. And i can come up with counteractions to direct their thoughts into following me and to disempower themselves. Right?

I want people to be happy, because we are all connected and if you are happy you help me aswell
I want people to be in control of themselves because i feel like everyone has the tools to make their own life happy and full of growth.

Mon Jul 23, 2012 11:03 am » by **Bandanko**

monica44 wrote:Well being a guide of my own destiny, and the refusal to controlled by anyone/anything i am pleased to say i am free, i am free to do as i please, harm none with words/actions and all will be well......

Not married then...

I am not free to do what I want most of the time

Mon Jul 23, 2012 11:46 am » by **Seriouscitizen**

Lowsix wrote:
Curious why you didnt call out Shemagh?

Shes the one that noted something "off".
Nothing strikes you as odd?

All i did was answer the question...

people can sense it bro..
has NOTHING to do with me.at all..
m just crediting them for their "instincts".
Theyre usually correct.

fact.

Lowsix, Shemagh noticed she was uneasy with the post or poster,
She wasn't specifik on wich one of those two
She wasn't specifik on wich words of my post or wich aspects of my self were making her uneasy.
Hence it could be a thousand things.

it COULD be her knowledge doesn't resonate with mine
it COULD be her wisdom isn't at my level (wherever that may be)
it COULD be the information is confrontating
it COULD be she has a crush on NEM also

All i am saying it COULD be anything. All she is stating is what it isn't. She hasn't put out there what is going on inside her head except for her opinion on me.

So to my opinion it's heard to make a solid assumption without asking what is behind her feeling.

And by statin you are doing this to protect INNOCENT dtv'ers i respect that. But who determines who's innocent and who is not. I mean how can you be sure about me? I would like to know.

Mon Jul 23, 2012 12:58 pm » by **monica44**

Bandanko wrote:
monica44 wrote:Well being a guide of my own destiny, and the refusal to controlled by anyone/anything i am pleased to say i am free, i am free to do as i please, harm none with words/actions and all will be well......

Not married then...

I am not free to do what I want most of the time

Aw i am sorry about :lol:

that but i am sure she/he is worth it, no i am not married [anymore] although friends with my EX.
I have no desire to be controlled, or to control, live and let live i say, control comes from fear, and i have nothing to fear [except spiders, :ohno:

the critters move to fast].

Mon Jul 23, 2012 1:27 pm » by **Troll2rocks**

I feel I should speak out, because from the way this thread reads. Some people have insinuated SeriousCitizen and Newearthman are the same person. SeriousCitizen is now in the position of trying to say she is who she really is, because of an assumption and no facts to back it up.

This is what I can only gather is the building paranoia caused on here by some old member who has taken it upon himself to trick and deceive people by creating multiple personalities. (AlreadyDead) is the person behind these personalities. There were others in the past who have done similar, but AlreadyDead is the one behind these...

1973samtyler / CyberHobbit / Woodsoul / CaptainRutford / EveMedusa / and AlreadyDead (the original account).

There are more I am sure, and in time they will be removed.

I have done a check, and SeriousCitzen and Newearthman appear clean of these allegations "completely". I did these checks (not because I believe it, no not at all) but because of the recent revelations, and to reassure people and calm the spreading of " paranoia " on here (which is all this is about anyway).

Now, is that check fool proof in and of itself ? NO. Proxies and all kinds of things can be employed to avoid IP detection. Unless you know what you are doing, and want to spend the time tracking a specific IP or clusters of them, to a "specific" destination and then taking it from there, there are no legal means of doing fool proof checks without involving a service provider (and even they are limited by law as to what they can do, and how much they can find) in these cases without breaking the law with cooperation of the law, and spending the time doing them properly. It can be done though, but it is illegal and invasive and just generally everything I stand opposed to.

I stand up here for both of them, from the checks I have made (totally legal and all on site too by the way).

They are clean. I think it is the nature and the manner in which this post and a couple of others have been worded that have aroused suspicion, in light of recent events, and how they transpired too. I myself saw the title and thought, hmmmmm :think:

The other day, I wrongly banned a user (SwitchTrap) he turned up in a thread, at the wrong place at the wrong time, I did not check properly and I thought I had all I needed just by checking the post history, which was very suspicious considering what was taking place at the time, not to mention having large gaps between the users last post and the one they turned up with on a particular thread where AlreadyDead was confessing his multiple accounts after I outed him about a "persona", which had slipped the radar and had been interacting and conversing with people on here for months. Even going to the lengths of talking to himself on threads in these multiple personality's. Turns out that user was 1973samtyler. A fictional woman created by what I can only assume to be a deeply confused and disturbed person. This shocked people, and it has been causing paranoia ever since.

There will be no witch hunts, no insinuations. If something or someone makes one of you on here suspicious, report it, and we will do all that we can on here to check it out, and remove them from the site if there is any justification for it. Remember it is innocent until proven guilty, not the other way around, and it is our job to try and remove this filth, and we will do it as and when it comes to light, and believe me, you guys will know about it too. Name and shame, thats exactly what we will do, why not, if they are found to be guilty of doing it, put em out there for all to see, and let you guys grill em about it, and lets see em try to explain it to you all, before they get removed by us.

Do not play into the paranoia, if there is any revelation regarding deeply hidden smurfs on here, you have my promise (yeah I know that ain't worth shit), that I will inform you all about it. There is no conspiracy, just a very devious and disturbed person, trying to cause confusion and spread paranoia. Try not to let it work people. I know how this shit works, look at my name for god sake. Take it from me, this person is not as clever as he thinks he is.

So yeah, SeriousCitizen and Newearthman are clean of the allegations. Lets not character assassinate people based on assumptions people, I did that the other night, and it turned out I was wrong. :cheers:

Mon Jul 23, 2012 2:19 pm » by **Seriouscitizen**

Troll2rocks wrote:I feel I should speak out, because from the way this thread reads. Some people have insinuated SeriousCitizen and Newearthman are the same person. SeriousCitizen is now in the position of trying to say she is who she really is, because of an assumption and no facts to back it up.

This is what I can only gather is the building paranoia caused on here by some old member who has taken it upon himself to trick and deceive people by creating multiple personalities. (AlreadyDead) is the person behind these personalities. There were others in the past who have done similar, but AlreadyDead is the one behind these...

1973samtyler / CyberHobbit / Woodsoul / CaptainRutford / EveMedusa / and AlreadyDead (the original account).

There are more I am sure, and in time they will be removed.

I have done a check, and SeriousCitzen and Newearthman appear clean of these allegations "completely". I did these checks (not because I believe it, no not at all) but because of the recent revelations, and to reassure people and calm the spreading of " paranoia " on here (which is all this is about anyway).

Now, is that check fool proof in and of itself ? NO. Proxies and all kinds of things can be employed to avoid IP detection. Unless you know what you are doing, and want to spend the time tracking a specific IP or clusters of them, to a "specific" destination and then taking it from there, there are no legal means of doing fool proof checks without involving a service provider (and even they are limited by law as to what they can do, and how much they can find) in these cases without breaking the law with cooperation of the law, and spending the time doing them properly. It can be done though, but it is illegal and invasive and just generally everything I stand opposed to.

I stand up here for both of them, from the checks I have made (totally legal and all on site too by the way).

They are clean. I think it is the nature and the manner in which this post and a couple of others have been worded that have aroused suspicion, in light of recent events, and how they transpired too. I myself saw the title and thought, hmmmmm

The other day, I wrongly banned a user (SwitchTrap) he turned up in a thread, at the wrong place at the wrong time, I did not check properly and I thought I had all I needed just by checking the post history, which was very suspicious considering what was taking place at the time, not to mention having large gaps between the users last post and the one they turned up with on a particular thread where AlreadyDead was confessing his multiple accounts after I outed him about a "persona", which had slipped the radar and had been interacting and conversing with people on here for months. Even going to the lengths of talking to himself on threads in these multiple personality's. Turns out that user was 1973samtyler. A fictional woman created by what I can only assume to be a deeply confused and disturbed person. This shocked people, and it has been causing paranoia ever since.

There will be no witch hunts, no insinuations. If something or someone makes one of you on here suspicious, report it, and we will do all that we can on here to check it out, and remove them from the site if there is any justification for it. Remember it is innocent until proven guilty, not the other way around, and it is our job to try and remove this filth, and we will do it as and when it comes to light, and believe me, you guys will know about it too. Name and shame, thats exactly what we will do, why not, if they are found to be guilty of doing it, put em out there for all to see, and let you guys grill em about it, and lets see em try to explain it to you all, before they get removed by us.

Do not play into the paranoia, if there is any revelation regarding deeply hidden smurfs on here, you have my promise (yeah I know that ain't worth shit), that I will inform you all about it. There is no conspiracy, just a very devious and disturbed person, trying to cause confusion and spread paranoia. Try not to let it work people. I know how this shit works, look at my name for god sake. Take it from me, this person is not as clever as he thinks he is.

So yeah, SeriousCitizen and Newearthman are clean of the allegations. Lets not character assassinate people based on assumptions people, I did that the other night, and it turned out I was wrong.

Thank you troll,. I actually missed the whole alreadydead alterego circumstances from the last few days. PFf.. That's what i get having a few no-internet days (against my will ;) ). So I didn't really get what all the "hostility' was from at first. But i've read most of that thread now and i am imagining what an anxiety that may cause to some.

Too bad this may have caused some to misinterpet my post. I was having these thoughts of us being controlled by our patterns, by our systems, and by other people. This is actually what this alterego liar was trying to do also,. control and play with us. So in a way my thoughts make sense on that to ;)
For me this is an good example on how easily we are being triggerd and manipulated.

Being NAIVE and being PARANOID are two extremes,. and in between we can be AWARE i think.
Aware and conscious in the way we talk, think and feel toward ourselves and others.

Tue Jul 24, 2012 2:16 am » by **Spock**

I've got S.S. on Skype, she definitely appears to be a woman, could be a man in drag though.

Tue Jul 24, 2012 2:30 am » by **Newearthman**

Spock wrote:I've got S.S. on Skype, she definitely appears to be a woman, could be a man in drag though.

...and I could be gay

This is about liberty from all the petty systems that have control over our lives and the automatic negative thoughts (ANT's) that invade our mind with little negative thoughts through out the day.

Tue Jul 24, 2012 3:14 am » by **Thewatcher**

Lowsix wrote:
Shemagh wrote:Why does this post(er) make me feel uneasy??

That unidentifiable feeling is what usually gives the long gamers away..
The "what" is hard to quantify. Even harder to prove..

They havent quite learned how to completely trick the radar.

Your unease is a symptom of recognition.

NEM is gonna learn all about it in a few days.

Wise words from a wise man.

:flop:

I control the remote control that's about it.
My mrs and my kids control me and my wallet :lol:

As long as there happy I'm happy, so yes I'm not in control as I've never really been a control freak anyhow's.

:flop: