Could This Be Real Proof "THE 9/11 PLANE WAS A HOLOGRAM"

[lamonema Profile]

My cousin was there Sav he saw the whole thing, they were planes. Perhaps the decibel measurements of the engines would proove they were planes. Perhaps you could look into it? Since i suck at computers and such. To put it simple IMO the video camara was not set up for fine tuned def, which means it was running on economy setting. Plus the object is moving quite fast, against a grey back drop which makes it hard to focus and detail is lost. Even slow motion won't show what the camara negated. I would look for tiling by zooming in even more, does that make any sence? Better yet get Lowsix he would be able to explain it much better that i can. I still love real cameras you know the whole kodalith thing can shakein and dark rooms. I don't much like digital stills or video IMO nothing beats a mechanical auto advance rewinding Minolta. just sayin

[Tjahzi Profile]

interesting, i've been pondering on the same idea for a few days.

to me, the possibility exists. perhaps it's not even that farfetched.

we'll see

[Marduk2012 Profile]

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=141_1228120924

[Mugenroshi8 Profile]

I'm still the fence about Al-quieda (or however it's spelled).
Dig deeper. Find out why. Find out who.

If you have interest in that topic, do research into military operations in Afghanistan during the late 70s. Al-Qaeda was created (assembled) and trained by the CIA as an insurgent force to combat the Soviets during that time. They became big in the 80's as American presence pulled out, but their top commanders have always been trained by the CIA, and a few even on their payroll. Osama Bin Ladin was put in charge by the USofA.

(sounds like Hussein, and about a dozen other dictators, and terrorist leaders we can think of running around doesn't it?)

Al-Qaeda was not responsible for the attacks of 9/11; The Bin Ladin family agreed that the organization would take the fall; Osama did not agree. Osama's family met with Bush the days before the attack in America and they had dinner. This is where the deal was made.
Osama's first video seemed authentic, denying their involvement yet not afraid to say we got what we deserved. All the videos in the years that followed were terrible forgeries.

Benazir Bhutto shared with the world the truth: that Osama Bin Ladin has been dead for quite some time. A week later, she was assassinated.

The young Egyptian who's face is famous for the 9/11 attacks, was indeed on the CIA payroll. It was a backyard deal and some profited, while others obviously did not.

They are not responsible, but don't mind taking a lot of heat, as it draws muslims who dislike America's involvement in their countries, towards the organization. Exposure, some would die for it!

[Astroboy777 Profile]

Shit. MEP again and chris.

Thanks(don't tell anyone I agree with mep). I was wondering how a hologram could make a wing impression on the facade.

I'm still the fence about Al-quieda (or however it's spelled).

The fact is it happened.
The questions are why it was allowed to happen. Who did it and why.

Not the fact that three buildings fell that day. Although. I'm still dubious about 7.

I think that wikileaks bloke made a good point. You're too busy trying to find something out of the obvious.

Dig deeper. Find out why. Find out who.

'the little toilet' can drive trucks and boats. NOT fly jets.

Hello concrete,

I don't know if you have seen these vids, if not, then I would recommend you watch them, you seem like a smart person to me, so I sure you will find them very interesting! I did...

9/11 Fraud: David Ray Griffin, Part 1
[youtube]pCHN-1Yk5LI&feature=related[/youtube]
9/11 Fraud: David Ray Griffin, Part 2
[youtube]Gxorz4jWDMY&feature=related[/youtube]

David Ray Griffin "Time for second look" Hamburg 5/9/09
[youtube]kGDA2P0ImNQ&feature=related[/youtube]

Note: David is speaking in English at this conference...

[Memccool Profile]

watch if was a hologram then when the wing disappears the engine under the wing would be gone as well

[Megame23 Profile]

I just found this video. None of the sheeple on youtube get why he called it a missile, but it is because the explosion happens late... It also fits in with the hologram theory. I mean... it makes a lot of sense... the planes hitting those buildings does NOT look right.

[youtube]eCn4BH7bYlE&NR=1[/youtube]

[Elnorel Profile]

Crappy videos such as these are in no way a good form of proof of any kind.

Video compression masks neighboring pixels and creates jumbled image which is frame from frame different depending on compression settings.

If the plane was shot using a HD camera from a much closer range, then you might have something.