Crop Formation Next to Stonehenge, May 9th

Thu May 13, 2010 3:37 am » by **Newearthman**

So I know the first one is man made thanks to you guys here :clapper:

The second one is pretty big and well formed...I guess the jury is still out for now.

What is the general theory for who is making the man made formations that go without whitness or claims of responsibility but show obvious signs of crop damage? Is it some kind of disinfo campain to distract from the real message done by nwo/black opps?

Thu May 13, 2010 3:43 am » by **Anuki**

ramondelft wrote:this is man made a hoax !!! sorry

http://translate.google.nl/translate?js=y&prev=_t&hl=nl&ie=UTF-8&layout=1&eotf=1&u=http%3A%2F%2Fniburu.nl%2Findex.php%3FarticleID%3D23239&sl=nl&tl=en

Thu May 13, 2010 3:46 am » by **Kingz**

that new one is fake according to Janet Ossebaard

TRANSLATOR:

My excitement was high when the second message this morning (May 10) came in: a large formation against Stonehenge!

But my disappointment was also great when I entered the formation, I stood in a field of rendering: crushed plants, board marks (print board), many footprints and dried plants. The photos speak for themselves ...

:look:

The last picture, the board marks clearly visible. When I was in my first corn formation, Uffington last year, I was also confronted with numerous broken stems. Yet I also found enough anomalies and biophysical indicators to suggest that the formation was authentic, but that energy was not well adapted to the corn plants had to go flat. In this case, however, today on May 10, 2010 compared to Stonehenge, I had come to the conclusion that I was a man-made formation. Probably a large team spent at least 20 strong. In the middle circle they had tried to weave Basket-effect. What a mess ... In itself a striking design seen from the sky well done, but on the ground ... And not even original but a continuing renovations done on the Old Sarum formation. Well, even this part of the phenomenon, and I'm glad I'm gone. The contrast between authentic and man-made is huge and always good to see. Moreover, the weather was beautiful and provided the combination of sun and clouds beautiful pictures ...
http://www.circularsite.com/gedachten44.htm
http://niburu.nl/index.php?articleID=23239

Thu May 13, 2010 3:51 am » by **Newearthman**

That sucks man...why do people have to do this...Who is benifiting from making it?

Thu May 13, 2010 4:09 am » by **Knurrebusk**

Just visited briefly your site, a great place, but naive.
I´m naive myself, but more like, take a hit! and go very deadly, to stay away to live another day naive.

Been all over the place, do not glitter over primitive deadends ever ok!
Follow 1 advise, naivety killed the cat, basta for women, but even crazy men like me.

Thu May 13, 2010 4:18 am » by **sockpuppet**

newearthman wrote:That sucks man...why do people have to do this...Who is benifiting from making it?

Just to create/add confusion. Crop circles have been going on for a very, very long time. But when people finally took an interest in them, people starting going out and creating their own- some of these people may have just been doing it for kicks, and others may have been doing it in order to make crop circles look like a joke for those who were trying to study them. Now with MASER technology hooked onto satellites, I have no doubt that government(s) are making their own crop circles. Why? I don't know! I don't know if governments are distracting from crop circles, of if they are replying to messages left in other crop circles. The only thing I am certain about is that they aren't doing it for the hell of it.