Death to you, and you, and you, and ....

Initiate
Posts: 421
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 3:40 pm

PostMon Feb 01, 2010 8:04 pm » by 1ofakind


The first line on those stones is really disturbing, who is going to clean all of the MP's moats.

Master Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 10861
Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 12:36 am

PostMon Feb 01, 2010 8:14 pm » by Lowsix


1ofakind wrote:The first line on those stones is really disturbing, who is going to clean all of the MP's moats.


Unwittingly, you have accurately nailed the ONE objection that basically and realistically flushes ALL of this Depopulation nonsense right down the toilet.

They arent going to kill of 6 Billion of their worker bees.
Just...aint...happening.
(on purpose, anyways)
Image
warløckmitbladderinfection wrote:blasphemous new gehenna inhabitant makes god sad...

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 1634
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 1:31 am

PostMon Feb 01, 2010 8:25 pm » by Dirttyrabbit


LowSix wrote:
1ofakind wrote:The first line on those stones is really disturbing, who is going to clean all of the MP's moats.


Unwittingly, you have accurately nailed the ONE objection that basically and realistically flushes ALL of this Depopulation nonsense right down the toilet.

They arent going to kill of 6 Billion of their worker bees.
Just...aint...happening.
(on purpose, anyways)



http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/weapon/

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/weapon/introduction

You can’t see it. You can’t hear it. You can’t smell it. Yet a biological weapon could decimate an entire city. In 1942, the United States government, sanctioned by President Franklin Roosevelt, began a highly classified program to research and develop bioweapons. It was the first in a series of steps, each motivated by fear of powerful enemies, that took the United States down a path to develop a new weapon of mass destruction.

From producer John Rubin, this one-hour AMERICAN EXPERIENCE documentary offers an unprecedented look at more than two decades of closed-door meetings, secret test sites, determined scientists, and human subjects that attempted to turn some of the world’s most potent germs into some of the world’s most effective weapons. “It was a turning point in the way America was willing to fight,” says producer John Rubin. “Roosevelt’s decision acknowledged the readiness to use a kind of weapon that military leaders had long shunned as dishonorable.”

The United States had just been attacked at Pearl Harbor and was fighting a world war on two fronts. Intelligence fueled fear that Adolf Hitler was developing a terrifying new weapon — a bomb that could target soldiers and civilians alike with lethal microbes. And in the world of medicine, doctors and scientists were prepared to exploit their new understanding of germs. The stage was set for America to enter the dirty business of biological warfare. “Once you’re looking at a science not strictly for the benefits that it can bring, but for the damage it can inflict on an enemy, you’re in a whole new world,” explains Jeanne Guillemin, Senior Advisor to MIT’s Security Studies Program.

In the spring of 1943, scientists began arriving at Camp Detrick in Maryland. The team was comprised of virologists and bacteriologists from the top universities and pharmaceutical companies in the nation. Their work took place under the ultimate security classification — the same level as the parallel Manhattan Project to build an atom bomb. “In some cases there were only four or five people who actually knew the extent of what was going on at Camp Detrick,” says Norman Covert, an expert in the history of America’s bioweapons program. What was going on was the race to develop biological weapons strong enough to destroy an entire population.

But when World War II ended after the dropping of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the world saw what nuclear weapons could do and many questioned the need for biological warfare. Advocates, however, pushed forward, and with the rise of the Cold War the program intensified. No one knew what the Soviets had in development, but U.S. strategists were determined to be ready. “During the Cold War, the idea of retaliation was paramount,” explains biowarfare expert Martin Furmanski. “If the Soviets had biological weapons, we had biological weapons.”

For more than two decades testing continued — not just in Maryland laboratories, but in ventilation systems in Washington, D.C., on the streets of St. Louis, on the shores of San Francisco Bay, and in the desert of Utah. The most conclusive tests took place in 1965 near a Pacific atoll called Johnston, when a single military plane sprayed a long line of germs that cause a deadly disease, tularemia. “These field tests demonstrated beyond any shadow of a doubt the feasibility of biological warfare,” says Bill Patrick, former chief of product development at Detrick. “We infected animals some sixty, seventy kilometers downwind from the point of spray. And that is why we know that one particular agent, when properly stabilized and properly disseminated is a very effective weapon system.”

But just four years later, the program came to an abrupt end. On November 25, 1969, President Richard Nixon made a stunning announcement: “Mankind already holds in its hands too many of the seeds of its own destruction… Therefore I have decided that the United States will renounce the use of any form of deadly biological weapons that either kill or incapacitate.”

While Nixon’s declaration ended America’s offensive bioweapons programs, military leaders and researchers had opened a door that could never be shut. “They’ve bequeathed on a world this knowledge and we now have to control it and contain it and make sure the biological weapons are never used,” cautions historian Brian Balmer.

“Today, perhaps more than ever, people are aware of what a biological attack could do to a city or a nation,” says AMERICAN EXPERIENCE executive producer Mark Samels. “The program was, in many ways, a consequence of the mindset that scientific and medical advances could be turned on their heads to create massive destruction.”
.

Initiate
Posts: 421
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 3:40 pm

PostMon Feb 01, 2010 9:01 pm » by 1ofakind


Thanks for that rabbit I'v been looking at a few things they were doing at portadown. They absolutly have the means to do what they want if they wish and they have had plenty of time to perfect these things. You only have to look at what Saddam did all those years ago, another one of their twisted experiments probably.

Master Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 10861
Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 12:36 am

PostMon Feb 01, 2010 9:14 pm » by Lowsix


lol but no one will answer this:
(its getting ridiculous)

Who is going to make up the labor force if they kill everyone?
And all of the "NWO lizard Lord leaders" have been spared?

sort of an important question to ask yourself.
Image
warløckmitbladderinfection wrote:blasphemous new gehenna inhabitant makes god sad...

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 2973
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 2:13 am

PostMon Feb 01, 2010 9:27 pm » by Kingz


LowSix wrote:lol but no one will answer this:
(its getting ridiculous)

Who is going to make up the labor force if they kill everyone?
And all of the "NWO lizard Lord leaders" have been spared?

sort of an important question to ask yourself.



I won't doubt the fact.. that if "they"wanna do it, they will, the how doesn't matter that much.. But to exterminate 6 billion is a little over the top i think!

But The men in power have stated multiple times infront of camera's and interviews that they are for population reduction.. that's not even a secret.

Someone told me not so long ago about the fact that the western world is having less baby's every year. That's not so weird, but if you concider the fact that within 50 years or so child birth has gone down with MANY procents (example: 50 years ago it was pretty normal to have a family of 10 kids) And when eventually the baby boomers will die, there will be a big difference in population in general in western countries! That's a fact!

I think this has to do ofcourse with the fact that we don't need so many more kids as we used to dobecause then we did it for survival and religious beliefs..

Now we are so "brainwashed" that our generations don't even have time for more then 3 kids or something..

You get the idea I think.. :headscratch:
The Map Is Not The Territory, The Word Is Not The Object....
_______________________________________________________________
Image

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 1634
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 1:31 am

PostMon Feb 01, 2010 9:40 pm » by Dirttyrabbit


LowSix wrote:lol but no one will answer this:
(its getting ridiculous)

Who is going to make up the labor force if they kill everyone?



no no silly they wont kill everyone...
they will keep some.. the ones who wont fight back...the ones they select...


low666 is still in a magic bubble everything is OK in his world..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xD3HxGBIfN4


Upload to Disclose.tv

.

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 2973
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 2:13 am

PostMon Feb 01, 2010 9:42 pm » by Kingz


[/quote]
everything is OK in his world..
[/quote]

Everything Is OK!

The Map Is Not The Territory, The Word Is Not The Object....
_______________________________________________________________
Image

Initiate
Posts: 421
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 3:40 pm

PostMon Feb 01, 2010 9:59 pm » by 1ofakind


Half a billion people is probably a perfect number. You don't need all of us to make the things you want, you only need some. A majority of us are consumers and we help in no way what so ever in their eyes. The thing that bothers me is that they say the world is overpopulated, when in fact most of our world is empty. Only the city's and the big towns are overpopulated. There are masses of land all over the globe where people dont live because everyone seems to have a dream that living in a city will give them a better life. If we all moved to these places and became self reliant then we could blow this stupid illusion, this myth out of the water that the world can't cope with billions of people living on it.

Initiate
Posts: 294
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 8:48 pm

PostMon Feb 01, 2010 10:06 pm » by Ruquick


R.C. Christian = Roman Catholic Christian


PreviousNext

  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post
Visit Disclose.tv on Facebook