Deuems Research Findings

Thu Dec 08, 2011 10:01 pm » by **Mrmcnuggets**

Just like that psychedelic morphing astronaut had a nice time dancin 'round with no foot right? You're a fucking moron frut. :alien51:

Fact is, if there is no possibility to enter space, we would know nothing about this universe. Where did all these numbers come from? They cannot be made up, if they fucking work perfectly. :idea:

Fri Dec 09, 2011 3:41 am » by **Taintedsample**

Excellent post, this.

Fri Dec 09, 2011 3:46 am » by **Propagandist**

Yes please ... :nope:

Fri Dec 09, 2011 8:09 am » by **Deuem**

@ mushroom, thanks, even if there is no refute it is nice to hear you are following and have interest. This is why a lot of good threads die off. The OP thinks no one is interested. A simple note like TY or OK or Keep going is enough. If you or another reader wants to get involved that is Ok also. I hope I can answer the question. I will try.

@ mrmcnuggets, Your right and it is like tabloid TV sometimes. A lot of people like reading the fights and fake stuff, it is exciting. To actually sit down and read a tech book is not. My self I like things of value and I get upset if I don't learn something new every day. The day I stop learning is the day I am ready for the box in the ground. I also hope you can do me a favor on this thread and don't worry about Mr Fruit. He is more than welcome to join in as long as he does not step out of place. Some of his work is worth chasing and some is not. It is up to the reader. I tend to present a different approach and I put the cards on the table face up for all to see. Maybe Mr Fruit will join in and take a more serious approach. I sure hope so. To date I don't think I have verified a single thing as being real or fake. All I have done is to prove the picture could be possible and if they did fake it they did a good job. A lot of NASA photos have been touched up. I agree 100%, rather they are movie sets or real is still to be determined. But I need a lot more work to figure that out for sure. One way or the other I will always post what I find, good or bad.

@ taintedsample, thank you and I also follow your Mars post and have chimed in a few times. I really could use that technology for the dust removal on my SUV. Where I live it gets dusted from construction dust every day.

@ propagandist, thank you for chiming in. Please participate when you have a question or something to look into.

@ Mr Fruit, see the next post, welcome aboard.

Deuem

Fri Dec 09, 2011 8:37 am » by **Deuem**

frutty wrote:Ok. What darwin did was scale down one image to fit the earth's size of the other just Like I did in less than a minute without the gibberish. I understand but that gibberish is called Math and it does take some time to do. I could have done it in a minute also but I decided to waste more time. This gives it just a little more credibility. The 2 Earth photos in my gif are sized to the best of my Math abilities. That takes time and wastes paper. But I am glad you got similar results. So we can say we are on the same page or in the same book. I did state that there are 3 reasons I could think of. 1) my Math is wrong. 2) There is a bulge in photo 6871 or they used a fish eye lens. 3) One or both of the photos are fake. Also: At this time I am feeling it is either #2 or #3 but I can not tell for sure. ( mostly #2 ) below is Mr Fruits gif

My gif

Fact is: if you are on or orbiting the moon the Earth's sizes should be approximately the same as the distance you may be while orbiting the moon from the ground would be so little (in comparison with the lengths involved) that they would not count in the calculations (negligible).
I will agree with that statement, from 382,000km the difference is negligible.

So both of the images were taken with hasselblad cameras. That means their frame window is the same. Hasselblad cameras don't have the zoom capability we have now.
I am working on this, are you reading my mind? The cameras had different lenses and something else. More to come later when I finish.

So for starters one of the two images is fake, because both cannot be real.

Having studied the big Moon landing hoax I can say with confidence both are fake.

I am sorry to disturb this disinfo thread by NASA propagandist "The Darwin", but somebody asked me to. I am really sorry you feel this way, I can't think of one sentence that shows I am a propagandist or disinfo Agent, unless you mean when I wrote that I still believe man went to the Moon and used the space shuttle and there is an ISS in orbit. Ok if this is what you mean then I fit the bill and proud of it. Until I can verify anything wrong I am on the sheeps side. Being on two different sides makes life interesting. Please just keep it clean and you are more than welcome to voice your side.

I am asking everyone including me to keep it as professional as we can. There are hundreds of threads with fighting and name calling. I really want this one to be clean of that.
Thank you for your time Mr Fruit and I hope between us we can both do better.
Deuem

Fri Dec 09, 2011 8:56 am » by **Mrmcnuggets**

deuem wrote:@ mrmcnuggets, Your right and it is like tabloid TV sometimes. A lot of people like reading the fights and fake stuff, it is exciting. To actually sit down and read a tech book is not. My self I like things of value and I get upset if I don't learn something new every day. The day I stop learning is the day I am ready for the box in the ground. I also hope you can do me a favor on this thread and don't worry about Mr Fruit. He is more than welcome to join in as long as he does not step out of place. Some of his work is worth chasing and some is not. It is up to the reader. I tend to present a different approach and I put the cards on the table face up for all to see. Maybe Mr Fruit will join in and take a more serious approach.

Deuem

my approach towards mr waste of space is that towards his love of spam towards me, but per your request I will keep the hate to the minimum in your thread. :flop:

Fri Dec 09, 2011 9:27 am » by **Deuem**

mrmcnuggets wrote:
deuem wrote:@ mrmcnuggets, Your right and it is like tabloid TV sometimes. A lot of people like reading the fights and fake stuff, it is exciting. To actually sit down and read a tech book is not. My self I like things of value and I get upset if I don't learn something new every day. The day I stop learning is the day I am ready for the box in the ground. I also hope you can do me a favor on this thread and don't worry about Mr Fruit. He is more than welcome to join in as long as he does not step out of place. Some of his work is worth chasing and some is not. It is up to the reader. I tend to present a different approach and I put the cards on the table face up for all to see. Maybe Mr Fruit will join in and take a more serious approach.

Deuem

my approach towards mr waste of space is that towards his love of spam towards me, but per your request I will keep the hate to the minimum in your thread.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Thanks a million and I just saw your notes on the Apollo note book, very good and it needs to be followed up. I posted a response for you there. This is a reason I am here. I like this kind of stuff. Makes you think. You are also welcome to add it here. I will also look into it.

For the rest of the readers:
In another thread we have been discussing the Notebook that is strapped to the Astronauts left arm. It appears to have pages of hand written notes for what he has to do that day. The question was brought up about the material used. We all tend to think that if it was simple paper it should disintegrate rather fast in that environment. So what is it? Paper, Plastic or Metal. Why is it hand written and not typed? How do we figure it out. You all are welcome to join in on this one. If it is paper I think this is a problem. On mrmcnuggets last post, he suggested it was a type of military writing pad that needs no ink. Like a scratch pad. So this topic is OPEN.

Thanks and gook hunting,
Deuem :cheers:

Sat Dec 10, 2011 10:46 am » by **Deuem**

The correct NASA terminology for the notebooks is Checklist. They all had at least 3 different ones. One for the Command Module, The LM and a set for EVAs. I found an article on line about an EVA Checklist and they mention the material used as plastic sheets. ( See below )

http://www.bonhams.com/cgi-bin/public.sh/WService=wslive_pub/pubweb/publicSite.r?sContinent=EUR&screen=lotdetailsNoFlash&iSaleItemNo=4269029&iSaleNo=17402&iSaleSectionNo=1

The first paragraph from the site:
FLOWN APOLLO 16 EVA CUFF CHECKLIST.
ASTRONAUT CHARLES DUKE’S SPACE SUIT CUFF CHECKLIST.
Cuff checklist, comprising 29 thin plastic printed leaves, spiral-bound and attached to a 7-inch curved metal wrist band ("P/N SEB 33100302-302, S/N 1025"). Each leaf 3½ inches square and with a reference tab on the fore-edge, 2 also with tabs on the top-edge (for immediate access to EVA 3 activities and EMU malfunction trouble-shooting steps). The wrist band has an 18-inch Velcro strap ("P/N SEB 12100030-201, S/N 1087 ASSY"). The whole assembly mounted on a wooden base with plaque reading: "Presented to Fred Haise, EVA cuff checklist, with warmest personal regards from the crew of Apollo 16."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This sold for $206,000 It is from Apollo 16. It is Spiral bound and not Rings for this book. On Apollo 11 they just printed the EVA notes on their sleeves. The LM and CM books never went outside or in space so they could be paper with no problem. They also had a lot of blank pages and areas for calculations. These books could be written in and many notes were added. If you ever watched the Movie Apollo 13, you can see Tom Hanks using one to calculate re-orbit data. There were sections in the book per-printed for such emergencies. "malfunction trouble-shooting steps"

At this time I am still looking for the water stained book that another member posted but have been unable to find it. It must be in a video somewhere. Until I can see it and look it over, I can only imagine it must be either the CM or LM checklist. Until then I will keep an open mind. I hope everyone does.

Till next time
Deuem :cheers:

Sat Dec 10, 2011 3:45 pm » by **Nedroj**

Very nice work deuem. This is the kind of thread thats bakes my noodle :flop:

. Its on my subscribe list now . Keep up the impressive work :pray: