Dimitri Khalezov - WTC Nuclear Demolition - Full playlist

[Epicfailure Profile]

Wow look at all the spammers and dis-informationist just on this last page... only post once to comment on this thread, it's the same with Judy Woods, Alison Kruse..... never fails but gets missed all the time.

7forever now ronisrael

Israel? hmmmmm.... like Mossad Israel...?

[Cee420 Profile]

The underground nuclear affect on WTC

Ok..

When the dust samples, tested by USGS and other, show iron content of between 1 - 5 %
..can you please tell me where is the supposed “pulverized steel” which is a foundation of Khalezov’s theory?

..he claims that 300 m long part of towers got pulverized, as he demonstrates with the photo above (and in his video) but where is that steel/iron turned to dust?! ..in reality this pulverization never happened ..just about the same amount of steel column was taken away from the site as was brought in when they were building the Towers
..they shipped most of the steel to China and India, who then re-used it

..and you can see Twin Tower core columns all over the WTC site after the events. ..the core columns are the individual columns in the pic, and the perimeter columns are as wall-elements , with several columns attached together



Here’s a USGS WTC dust elements table ..from which you can verify my claim about the iron %:
http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2001/ofr-01-042 ... table.html

..and here’s one article covering the iron-spheres in the WTC dust:

http://911caper.com/2010/12/25/billions ... materials/
“The fraction of microspheres in the dust varied (between 0.2 and 1.3 % for USGS outdoor samples and a mean of 5.87% for all RJ Lee samples) depending on the area where the samples were taken. Due to their shape and density, the spheres were not likely to have traveled as far as other components of the dust. The diameter of the spheres in two evaluated dust samples ranged from about one micron (0.001 mm) to 1.5 mm.”

..apparently, the mass of the Twin Towers were little under 40 % Steel and around the same % of concrete ..so if all of the material of the first 300 meters of the Towers got pulverized, the iron/steel content of the dust should be around the same 40 %, but it is not even close to that ..only around 5 % max, and some samples showed less than 1% of iron
..can you explain this, Ron? ..where is the pulverized steel which is the ‘foundation’ of Khalezov’s theory?

There goes the ‘theory’ you’re promoting ..shown to be false.


This same fact debunks Judy Woods DEW-claims also ..cause she also holds that the steel structures got pulverized, when this actually never happened.
The iron spheres came from nano-thermite cutting charges ..iron rich micro-spheres are a by-product of thermite-reaction.

[Cee420 Profile]

Math does not lie:

LOL ..yea, math has never been used to lead people astray ..never, right?!

Show them fancy and complex calculations and charts, which they don’t understand and you can lead the dispute on as long as some one can show the math to be false

..math is used for propaganda, quite often


Ed Ward’s thermite-calculations are total bull shit

http://letsrollforums.com/showpost.php? ... ostcount=4

- He calculated that the whole 5 acre are was to be heated to certain temps ..when in reality the fires and molten steel pockets ..where just that ..’pockets’

So this 15 feet x 5-7 acre area-claim is total horse shit
..so of course he will get million and millions of pounds of thermite-need with this kind of math

One acre is equal to 4840 square yards and your pond is 15 feet or 5 yards deep therefore the number of cubic yards is 4840x15 or 72600 cubic yards.<http://www.blurtit.com/q6688887.html>http://www.blurtit.com/q6688887.html We have no official numbers on the depth of the 1600 degree temperature of the 5 to 7 acres of land, but unofficial estimates seem to indicate about 15 feet, so lets use that.

3240 lbs/cubic yd X 72600/per acre = 235,224,000 lbs/acre. At a minimum 5 acres of land was brought to seering temperatures so 235,224,000 X 5 = 1,176,120,000 lbs. So based on these basic approximate calculations the 'super thin invisible super top secret super thermate' would have to have been 2.14 Million miles long and would to have weighed approximately 1.176 Billion pounds.

- also, he’s calculations were based on thermite reaction-going on for 15 weeks, when in reality all the thermite needed to do is occasionally start reacting to keep the pockets hot

"This was scientific proof that beneath the rubble of the twin towers were extreme hot spots in which iron boiled for more than 15 weeks. ...it became clear that an aluminothermic reaction like Thermite was creating these hot spots."

Similar burn-rates around 350 m/s are measured for these "super-thermites" http://www.mrs.org/s_mrs/sec_subscribe. ... ion=detail A proven quote from my article dealing with the "The BS 'Bogus Science' of 'Explosive SuperThermite' Versus the Facts of a 'Deflagration Material'. http://www.rense.com/general77/geddno.htm

There are approximately 2,628,000 seconds in a month. http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index ... 842AAuCDvw 2,628,000 seconds X 3.75 months = 9,855,000 seconds. 350 meters X 9,855,000 seconds = 3,449,250,000 meters (approximately 3.45 Billion meters or 2,14 Million miles) of thermite length would be needed to burn for 15 weeks.

..a continued thermite-raction lasting 15 weeks really is not needed
When temperatures, exceeding 3500 degrees Celsius, can be achieved with nano-thermites,
..as it is explained in this article by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL)
Nanoscale Chemistry Yields Better Explosives
https://www.llnl.gov/str/RSimpson.html

…these kind of temps heat the “insulation materials” around the air-tights pockets very hot ..and when there is a lot of material on top of these pockets these pockets do not cool down that fast
To claim that an ongoing thermite-reaction for 15 weeks is need to keep pockets extremely hot, is leading people astray
..or this guy is just naturally a total idiot


See, thermite-reaction does not need outside oxygen source to burn cause the needed oxygen is in the metal-oxides of the composite ..this is why thermite is used in underwater welding.

To keep a pocket of space “super heated” for 15 weeks you need

-loads of insulation to keep the pocket air-tight, and to keep it from cooling-down
..and the WTC site sure had a thick layer of dust and debris, so loads of insulation to keep the heat in the pockets

-thermite in the dust-material, which then occasionally burst into reaction ..which then naturally re-heats that particular pocket

Here’s a video clip from WTC site showing dust bursting into flames ..most likely because of the thermite-composite bits in it
..and the video comes from Ed Ward’s own YouTube channels


..and independent scientists like Niels Harrit and Steven jones have found un-reacted nano-thermite in the WTC dust, and this “combusting dust” very well explains why there were pocket fires going on for months after 9/11
Study: Scientists Discover Active Thermitic Material in WTC Dust
http://stj911.org/press_releases/Active ... erial.html

Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World TradeCenter Catastrophe
http://www.benthamscience.com/open/tocp ... ccess2.htm

..the “combusting dust” kept feeding the fires. Any time there was a “bump” or dust got loose inside these hot cavities, more thermite-dust got fed into the hot-spots and a thermite-reaction heated the pocket again
..and ongoing reaction for 15 weeks really is not needed
But sure, bull shit-artist will keep telling you this


On this video, Jon Cole demonstrates in his back yard, and with conventional thermate that he himself mixed how to make horizontal cuts using fairly small amounts of the thermate-composite
..huge amonts of thermite really is not needed to cut steel
..this stuff is NOT nano-thermite, which is far more reacting, producing more rapid and violent reaction and higher temperatures

9/11 Experiments: The Great Thermate Debate


And here is a video showing similar column-cutter phenomenon on the perimeter walls of WTC South Tower as the crude thermite-cutters assembled by Jon Cole in his back yard
The video below shos a violent orange burst(s) on the perimeter columns of South Tower
..so, if this is not a thermite-cutter charge(s) exploding inside the perimeter column(s) of WTC South Tower, then what is it?!

9-11 Thermite cutter charges exploding just before South Tower's demolition




PS.
Before someone claims the burst-phenomena was produced by the falling molten metal, explain the sharp 90 degree angle relative to the direction of movement (falling down) ..i don’t think that falling material can take such a sharp angle and burst sideways so violently as the orange-burst on the vid

[AnneBeck58 Profile]

[color=#80FF00]ello,
I have been trying to reach Dimitri Khalezov, and emails are not being answered. I've tried the 911thology sites, to no avail.
IF you have a way of getting a message to Dimitri, for me, would you please tell him I've been looking for him for a while, now? I'd so appreciate this.
Just tell him Anne (in Texas) is asking after him. Hoping he is well!
Thanks very much.[/color]H

Anne[color=#804080][color=#804080][/color][/color]