Syria: Does this seem fishy to you?

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 9212
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 7:52 pm

PostSat Dec 08, 2012 3:55 am » by Noentry


Cornbread from the videos and snippets of info I can find it seems he is using them.

Can I unequivocally say he has used these weapons, I have no evidence so I can not.

I hope I am wrong about him using them.
"The third-rate mind is only happy when it is thinking with the majority.
The second-rate mind is only happy when it is thinking with the minority.
The first-rate mind is only happy when it is thinking."
A. A. Milne

Master Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 10609
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2009 11:11 pm

PostSat Dec 08, 2012 4:03 am » by Cornbread714


Noentry wrote:
I hope I am wrong about him using them.


Me, too.
Where's the beer and when do I get paid?
- Jimmy Carl Black (the Indian of the group)

Initiate
User avatar
Posts: 960
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2011 12:23 am

PostSat Dec 08, 2012 4:27 am » by Ishumble


Very Fishy :think:
Image

Initiate
User avatar
Posts: 269
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2008 3:27 am

PostSat Dec 08, 2012 6:11 am » by Pauldamo


against it's own people? i thought they were fighting insurgents,anyway,yes i do think it's fishy,it's the same rhetoric we heard about Iraq before the west attacked.

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 2382
Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2012 9:16 am

PostSat Dec 08, 2012 10:50 am » by mediasorcery


Cornbread714 wrote:
Noentry wrote:
mediasorcery wrote:how do you know whose piloting that choppa and where it really is? just saying.



I dont.
:flop:

Just reporting what I find.

It could be military but not Chemical or biological.
I may not be Syria. Perhaps we have a member who can speak the language and verify what is being said in the above video.

As it stands imo he is more then capable of using these weapons to keep his ass on his throne.



ASSAD USING CHEMICAL WEAPONS NOW



Those are your words, are they not?

All I'm saying is: be careful about things you are asked to believe.

Personally, I'm not on any "side" of this debate.

Just asking questions.




exactly :flop:


how bad do you want to believe it then, time for the lies to stop, look how many dead now because of those rebel terrorists? so hows egypt working out now then? not to well i see?
the story of life is quicker than the blink of an eye, the story of love is hello and goodbye, until we meet again my friend.

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 4042
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 5:17 pm

PostSat Dec 08, 2012 11:03 am » by Mep630


Slith wrote:
Mep630 wrote:
None the less, Assad is losing big ground, so I think use of these weapons as last resort would be a smart move on Assada part, and should be expected if Damascus is taken.

There is absolutely nothing smart about using chemical weapons. Period!
well if you are being over run, it could seriously save your ass lol. That nerve gas is some evil shit. And whats the difference of that and our continual use od DU! I mean how come no one brings up the damage to our own troops from it.

NATO is playing a dirty game, you expect Syria to go down without a fight??! They are getting bombed and invaded any way you look at it, I am sure they will want to take some down with them.

If you help the Oppressors, eventually you and your family will be oppressed.

www.mind-wars.com

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 2382
Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2012 9:16 am

PostSat Dec 08, 2012 11:13 am » by mediasorcery


and who the fuk is the west to point the finger, depleted uranium/iraq anyone ,agent orange, etc etc etc etc, there is a lot more too btw,


this intervention in mid east could fuk us all up, bakfire badly on us all,


for fuks sake folks, wake up properly and see whats real and what isnt!! dont just swing with the mob mentality in how you view world events, there is plenty of psyops in the so called "truth" movement, with agendas running rife too.
the story of life is quicker than the blink of an eye, the story of love is hello and goodbye, until we meet again my friend.

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 7400
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 9:09 pm

PostSat Dec 08, 2012 7:07 pm » by Mozi!!a


Syria Propaganda Looking a Lot Like Iraq Propaganda


Upload to Disclose.tv


Super Moderator
User avatar
Posts: 19734
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 9:22 pm
Location: In your grill

PostSat Dec 08, 2012 7:26 pm » by Slith


Mep630 wrote:
Slith wrote:
Mep630 wrote:
None the less, Assad is losing big ground, so I think use of these weapons as last resort would be a smart move on Assada part, and should be expected if Damascus is taken.

There is absolutely nothing smart about using chemical weapons. Period!
well if you are being over run, it could seriously save your ass lol. That nerve gas is some evil shit. And whats the difference of that and our continual use od DU! I mean how come no one brings up the damage to our own troops from it.

NATO is playing a dirty game, you expect Syria to go down without a fight??! They are getting bombed and invaded any way you look at it, I am sure they will want to take some down with them.

Question I ask you. Would you think the same if you were among the populace?

Easy to be an armchair quarterback, much harder to be involved in the game
Image

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 9212
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 7:52 pm

PostSat Dec 08, 2012 10:03 pm » by Noentry


Bashar’s father Hafez al-Assad was brutal but never used chemical arms. And do you know which was the first army to use gas in the Middle East?

The bigger the lie the more people will believe it. We all know who said that – but it still works. Bashar al-Assad has chemical weapons. He may use them against his own Syrian people. If he does, the West will respond. We heard all this stuff last year – and Assad’s regime repeatedly said that if – if – it had chemical weapons, it would never use them against Syrians.

But now Washington is playing the same gas-chanty all over again. Bashar has chemical weapons. He may use them against his own people. And if he does…

Well if he does, Obama and Madame Clinton and Nato will be very, very angry. But over the past week, all the usual pseudo-experts who couldn’t find Syria on a map have been warning us again of the mustard gas, chemical agents, biological agents that Syria might possess – and might use. And the sources? The same fantasy specialists who didn’t warn us about 9/11 but insisted that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction in 2003: “unnamed military intelligence sources”. Henceforth to be acronymed as UMIS.
Coup de théâtre

And now, the coup de théâtre. Someone from the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation called me up this week to talk about the use of chemical weapons by Hafez al-Assad in Hama during the Sunni Muslim uprising in the city in 1982. Their sources were the same old UMIS. But I happened to have got into Hama in February 1982 – which is why the Canadian was calling me – and while Hafez’s Syrian army was very definitely slaughtering its own people (who were, by the way, slaughtering regime officials and their families), no one ever used chemical weapons.

Not a single soldier I saw in Hama carried a gas mask. No civilians carried gas masks. The dangerously perfumed air which I and my colleagues smelt after chemicals were used by our (then) ally Saddam against Iranian soldiers in the 1980s was not present. And none of the dozens of civilian survivors I have interviewed in the 30 years since 1982 ever mentioned the use of gas.

But now we are to believe that it was used. And so the infantile new fairy tale has begun: Hafez al-Assad used gas against his own people in Hama 30 years ago. So his son Bashar may do the same again. And wasn’t that one of the reasons we invaded Iraq in 2003 – because Saddam had used gas against his own people already and may do so again?
Bunkum

Yes, the bigger the lie, the better. Certainly we journos have done our duty in disseminating this bunkum. And Bashar – whose forces have committed quite enough iniquities – is about to be accused of another crime which he has not yet committed and which his father never did commit. Yup, chemical weapons are bad news, folks. That’s why the US supplied Saddam with the components for them, along with Germany (of course).

That’s why, when Saddam first used gas on Halabja, the UMIS told CIA officers to blame Iran. And yes, Bashar probably does have some chemicals in rusting bins somewhere in Syria. Madame Clinton has been worrying that they may “fall into the wrong hands” – as if they are presently “in the right hands”. But the Russians have told Bashar not to use them. Would he piss off his only superpower ally?

And by the way, which was the first army to use gas in the Middle East? Saddam? Nope. The Brits, of course, under General Allenby, against the Turks in Sinai in 1917. And that’s the truth.

Bashar al-Assad, Syria, and the truth about chemical weapons Saturday 8 December 2012
http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/com ... 93539.html
"The third-rate mind is only happy when it is thinking with the majority.
The second-rate mind is only happy when it is thinking with the minority.
The first-rate mind is only happy when it is thinking."
A. A. Milne


PreviousNext

  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post
Visit Disclose.tv on Facebook