Dr. Judy Wood's Book: Where Did The Tower's Go?

Writer
User avatar
Posts: 30
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2010 9:15 am
Location: Illinois

PostMon Feb 28, 2011 3:03 am » by Pookzta


Dr. Judy Wood’s book is finally out!

Check it out here: http://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com

This book is of vast importance - the most detailed and illustrative study of what happened to the WTC buildings - and a look at the nature and some of the possible history behind the technology which was used to turn more than 90% of those buildings to microspheric iron-rich dust.

See what people are saying about the book here: http://wheredidthetowersgo.com/comments

Here is a promotional trailer, which you can share with others if you wish:


Upload to Disclose.tv



In my professional opinion, this book is literally the single most evidence-packed piece of literature regarding 9/11 to be published since it happened. It is neither based on theory nor speculation; rather, it is simply based on easily-verifiable well-referenced physical evidence, analysis and discussion of that evidence, and the inescapable conclusions that are drawn from that evidence. This book is a must-read for any person who wishes to understand the true implications of the 9/11 attacks, and why there has been such an obvious, extensive, and relentless attempt to confuse people and divert our attention away from this overwhelming sum of important evidence. The truth has been out for a long time thanks to the selfless efforts of Dr. Judy Wood and the online database she has compiled at drjudywood.com, and now it has taken a new form.

The book is a 500-page, hardcover, full-color textbook, and the quality rivals even the most professional scientific text books I have bought for school.

Please support the book in some way, shape or form - even if only by forwarding or re-posting this message.


Thanks for reading this if you did!


Best wishes,

-Abe

Abraham Hafiz Rodriguez
M2 Medical Student
B.S. Biology / Neurobiology
Abrahm
Spreading Psytrance & Love in the Midwest USA

9/11 Challenge: Explain the Evidence http://pookzta.blogspot.com

Initiate
Posts: 396
Joined: Sun Jun 07, 2009 12:35 pm

PostSat Mar 12, 2011 1:39 pm » by Cee420


“90% of the Twin Towers turned to iron rich dust” …this simply isn’t true
Most of the concrete and similar material turned to dust and gravel because of the controlled demolition with high explosives and nano-thermite..
..but most of the structural steel was found in solid form ..it was not pulverized ..and you can easily verify this from photos and articles.
‘Iron rich micro spheres’ can be found in the WTC-dust and the source of this is the nano-thermite and the thermite-effect it produces
“Where did the Towers go?” ..the Twin towers did not leave a tall rubble pile because the material was ejected OUTWARDS and the rubble landed on a wide area ..and you can easily see this from the pictures.

Judy Woods “theories” are full of mistakes and some of the theories are quite silly even ..like the “melting of car engine blocks” ..this never happened

-
-
“In my professional opinion, this book..”
You’re a ”professional” in exactly what area that relates to the destruction of the WTC buildings?!
You’re an engineer who’ studying structural behavior during collapses or something?!

You’re such a professional that you “dropped out of the conversation” on your last “Judy Wood challenge thread”?
9-11-challenge-explain-the-evidence-t38676-50.html#p441243
Like a typical dis-info “agent” ..when you can’t explain your own mistakes when someone takes the time to provide reasonable explanations to most of the points of you “challenge” (me and others)..you disappear for few months and start a new thread with the same dis-info

-
-
I suggest that everyone who is seriously concearn about the 9/11 events and especially about the destruction of the WTC buildings
to watch this presentation by Richard Gage of ‘Architects & Engineers for 9//11 Truth’
9/11: Blueprint For Truth (part 1 of 13)


Upload to Disclose.tv


It’s FREE for everyone ..and demonstrates their claims with video evidence, not by silly assumptions and conclusions and still-photos used “out of context” ..like Judy Woods still photos of “WTC core turning to dust”, which never actually happened in reality

Check out the other scientific study videos from their YouTube channel on the structural behavior of the WTC buildings during their collapse
http://www.youtube.com/user/ae911truth
..some of the videos demonstrate the demolition ejection-waves from the demolition charges ..like this one here:

The North Tower exploding


Upload to Disclose.tv


This David Chandlers folder has many excellent video analyses of the controlled demolition of the WTC
http://www.youtube.com/user/DavidChandl ... 82383CCA91



:flop:

Don't fall for red herring dis-info agents like the "oh so polite pooktza" here

Writer
Posts: 11
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2007 9:50 am

PostSun Mar 13, 2011 7:06 pm » by Adjuk


cee420 wrote:
Judy Woods “theories” are full of mistakes and some of the theories are quite silly even ..like the “melting of car engine blocks” ..this never happened
---
Don't fall for red herring dis-info agents like the "oh so polite pooktza" here


Gosh - you have no idea do you?

http://tinyurl.com/911ftb

This is/will be the result of your actions:

http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/i ... &Itemid=55

I do hope you are considering your actions very carefully. You're either disingenuous or ill-informed. I do hope it's the latter - as that can be "fixed" more easily. If it's the former, then woe-betide you

Initiate
Posts: 396
Joined: Sun Jun 07, 2009 12:35 pm

PostSun Mar 13, 2011 8:08 pm » by Cee420


adjuk wrote:
cee420 wrote:
Judy Woods “theories” are full of mistakes and some of the theories are quite silly even ..like the “melting of car engine blocks” ..this never happened
---
Don't fall for red herring dis-info agents like the "oh so polite pooktza" here


Gosh - you have no idea do you?

http://tinyurl.com/911ftb

This is/will be the result of your actions:

http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/i ... &Itemid=55

I do hope you are considering your actions very carefully. You're either disingenuous or ill-informed. I do hope it's the latter - as that can be "fixed" more easily. If it's the former, then woe-betide you


Maybe i have better clue on 9/11 & WTC than you think, buddy
Have you checked out Judy Woods claims and compared them to the actual events?! ..see, I have.

:flop:

Initiate
User avatar
Posts: 569
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2011 12:37 pm

PostSun Mar 13, 2011 8:20 pm » by Tntbw


Stop arguing, you all want the same result, to inform people of the lies surrounding 9/11.

Initiate
Posts: 396
Joined: Sun Jun 07, 2009 12:35 pm

PostSun Mar 13, 2011 8:33 pm » by Cee420


adjuk wrote:
cee420 wrote:
Judy Woods “theories” are full of mistakes and some of the theories are quite silly even ..like the “melting of car engine blocks” ..this never happened
---
Don't fall for red herring dis-info agents like the "oh so polite pooktza" here


Gosh - you have no idea do you?

http://tinyurl.com/911ftb

This is/will be the result of your actions:

http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/i ... &Itemid=55

I do hope you are considering your actions very carefully. You're either disingenuous or ill-informed. I do hope it's the latter - as that can be "fixed" more easily. If it's the former, then woe-betide you


WOW! ..i just checked out your “no-thermite blog

http://911thermitefree.blogspot.com/sea ... -results=9

..you seem to be covering everything from cold fusion etc. but not actually going into the nano-thermite study itself by Niels Harrit et al. ..not into what the study actually found and how it was carried out and what methods were used

..well done! ..just like a true bullshit-artist :top:

Study: Scientists Discover Active Thermitic Material in WTC Dust (..original link to the study-pdf not working)
http://stj911.org/press_releases/Active ... erial.html

Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe
http://www2.ae911truth.org/downloads/Fu ... _paper.pdf

Writer
Posts: 11
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2007 9:50 am

PostSun Mar 13, 2011 8:34 pm » by Adjuk


Um no - the result that some people want is to keep the truth covered up.

Looks like neither poster has looked at the evidence - in my free book or on the website. So, the choice still is "uninformed" or "disingenuous".

The person calling me "buddy" - an inappropriate term in this context looks to be the former. In both cases, we have anonymity being a primary problem. In my case (Andrew Johnson) it is not a problem.

Good luck to all you people in "cover up muddle up land" - I expect ultimately you will be consumed by your own circle of lies.

Writer
Posts: 11
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2007 9:50 am

PostSun Mar 13, 2011 8:37 pm » by Adjuk


Oh dear - you haven't even studied the blog properly.

http://911thermitefree.blogspot.com/201 ... jones.html

So it's STILL either uninformed or disingenuous.

Initiate
Posts: 396
Joined: Sun Jun 07, 2009 12:35 pm

PostSun Mar 13, 2011 8:42 pm » by Cee420


adjuk wrote:Oh dear - you haven't even studied the blog properly.

http://911thermitefree.blogspot.com/201 ... jones.html

So it's STILL either uninformed or disingenuous.



So what exactly did the study find? ..and is any known source manufacturing such material? ..you should know this, right

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 2788
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 7:39 pm
Location: Oceanic 815

PostSun Mar 13, 2011 8:45 pm » by Epicfailure


Please take your filth elsewhere...

you got swatted last time you started a thread like this and ran like a little girl with you tail between your legs when you couldn't answer the questions once cornered with the facts.


you and your second profile here are just as bad as Alison Kruse and her stupid followers...

please do everyone a service and take your made up person called Judy Wood, and leave this site and never mention your stupid outlandish and completely baseless without evidence theories ever again here...

you can't and don't debate properly, you can't answer any of the questions on your own.

and when you get caught spreading lies you just plug another link, and say "Direct your questions to Judy"

Pathetic, liars, and shameful...

I understand though, getting beat up in high school plus the member size being small, would make anyone want to work as a dis-information agent with 2 accounts from 2 different IP's...

so do everyone a favor and admit your "short" comings and leave.
Image


Next

  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post
Visit Disclose.tv on Facebook