Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ ...Birther
38 posts
• Page 1 of 4 • 1, 2, 3, 4
I won!!! I won!!! I won!!! Judge Malihi ruled in my favor. Obama’s motion to quash my subpoena is denied! He has to appear at trial and present all the documents that I demanded to produce in my subpoena!

Yep , this is still an issue ..................
Barack Obama through his attorney Michael Jablonski filed a motion to quash my subpoena and all the other subpoenas. I was attacked yet again in this motion. Judge Malihi just issued an order. Motion to quash my subpoena was denied. Barack Obama, President of the United States will have to appear in court on January 26 and comply with my subpoena and produce all the documents, that I demanded.
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=30563
Yep , this is still an issue ..................
Barack Obama through his attorney Michael Jablonski filed a motion to quash my subpoena and all the other subpoenas. I was attacked yet again in this motion. Judge Malihi just issued an order. Motion to quash my subpoena was denied. Barack Obama, President of the United States will have to appear in court on January 26 and comply with my subpoena and produce all the documents, that I demanded.
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=30563
- Blondie1w2000

- Posts: 294
- Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 1:33 am
- Location: USA
Wow, if you go on that site and look, this case is being brought against Obama for multiple reasons by various plaintiffs, not just Taitz, regarding issues like possibly fraudulent Social Security number usage as well.
The thing that scares me about this is this....to cover it up, the PTB will need some other HUGE story to distract everyone's attention away from this. Like maybe a strike on or by Iran? God help us.
The thing that scares me about this is this....to cover it up, the PTB will need some other HUGE story to distract everyone's attention away from this. Like maybe a strike on or by Iran? God help us.
- Blondie1w2000

- Posts: 294
- Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 1:33 am
- Location: USA
Even the MSM is picking this up now.....
http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/ga-judge-orders-president-hearing-15407321
Ga. Judge Orders President to Appear at Hearing
ATLANTA January 21, 2012 (AP)
A judge has ordered President Barack Obama to appear in court in Atlanta for a hearing on a complaint that says Obama isn't a citizen and can't be president.
It's one of many such lawsuits that have been filed across the country, so far without success. A Georgia resident made the complaint, which is intended to keep Obama's name off the state's ballot in the March presidential primary.
An Obama campaign aide says any attempt to involve the president personally will fail and such complaints around the country have no merit.
The hearing is set for Thursday before an administrative judge. Deputy Chief Judge Michael Malihi on Friday denied a motion by the president's lawyer to quash a subpoena that requires Obama to show up.
http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/ga-judge-orders-president-hearing-15407321
Ga. Judge Orders President to Appear at Hearing
ATLANTA January 21, 2012 (AP)
A judge has ordered President Barack Obama to appear in court in Atlanta for a hearing on a complaint that says Obama isn't a citizen and can't be president.
It's one of many such lawsuits that have been filed across the country, so far without success. A Georgia resident made the complaint, which is intended to keep Obama's name off the state's ballot in the March presidential primary.
An Obama campaign aide says any attempt to involve the president personally will fail and such complaints around the country have no merit.
The hearing is set for Thursday before an administrative judge. Deputy Chief Judge Michael Malihi on Friday denied a motion by the president's lawyer to quash a subpoena that requires Obama to show up.
Good, We have regulations and standards for a REASON!
this applies to all, popular and unpopular!
no exceptions.
I hope he can muster some official documents.
this applies to all, popular and unpopular!
no exceptions.
I hope he can muster some official documents.

*View my post history under former usernames: JetXVII, Epicfailure, Slamgunshark*
DJ Jesus died for your Spins!
finaly a judge with some balls
ORDER ON MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENAS
Defendant, President Barack Obama, a candidate seeking the Democratic nomination for the
office of the President of the United States, has filed a motion to quash the subpoena compelling
his attendance at the hearing on January 26, 2012.
In support of his motion, Defendant argues that "if enforced, [the subpoena] requires him to
interrupt duties as President of the United States" to attend a hearing in Atlanta, Georgia.
However, Defendant fails to provide any legal authority to support his motion to quash the
subpoena to attend. Defendant's motion suggests that no President should be compelled to
attend a Court hearing. This may be correct. But Defendant has failed to enlighten the Court
with any legal authority. Specifically, Defendant has failed to cite to any legal authority
evidencing why his attendance is "unreasonable or oppressive, or that the testimony... [is]
irrelevant, immaterial, or cumulative and unnecessary to a party's preparation or presentation at
the hearing, or that basic fairness dictates that the subpoena should not be enforced." Ga. Comp.
R. & Regs. r. 616-1-2-.19(5).
Defendant further alludes to a defect in service of the subpoena. However, the Court's rules
provide for service of a subpoena upon a party, by serving the party's counsel of record. Ga.
Accordingly, Defendant's motion to quash is denied.
http://www.art2superpac.com/UserFiles/f ... llenge.pdf
ORDER ON MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENAS
Defendant, President Barack Obama, a candidate seeking the Democratic nomination for the
office of the President of the United States, has filed a motion to quash the subpoena compelling
his attendance at the hearing on January 26, 2012.
In support of his motion, Defendant argues that "if enforced, [the subpoena] requires him to
interrupt duties as President of the United States" to attend a hearing in Atlanta, Georgia.
However, Defendant fails to provide any legal authority to support his motion to quash the
subpoena to attend. Defendant's motion suggests that no President should be compelled to
attend a Court hearing. This may be correct. But Defendant has failed to enlighten the Court
with any legal authority. Specifically, Defendant has failed to cite to any legal authority
evidencing why his attendance is "unreasonable or oppressive, or that the testimony... [is]
irrelevant, immaterial, or cumulative and unnecessary to a party's preparation or presentation at
the hearing, or that basic fairness dictates that the subpoena should not be enforced." Ga. Comp.
R. & Regs. r. 616-1-2-.19(5).
Defendant further alludes to a defect in service of the subpoena. However, the Court's rules
provide for service of a subpoena upon a party, by serving the party's counsel of record. Ga.
Accordingly, Defendant's motion to quash is denied.
http://www.art2superpac.com/UserFiles/f ... llenge.pdf
When you buy halal products, you are financing inhumaely slaughter and torture of animals
blondie1w2000 wrote:Wow, if you go on that site and look, this case is being brought against Obama for multiple reasons by various plaintiffs, not just Taitz, regarding issues like possibly fraudulent Social Security number usage as well.
The thing that scares me about this is this....to cover it up, the PTB will need some other HUGE story to distract everyone's attention away from this. Like maybe a strike on or by Iran? God help us.
Indeed.............maybe even MAJOR false flag to cover ALL the bases.
Keep yer eyes peeled folks.....the game just went up a notch
Cheers

- Stratosfear

-
- Posts: 932
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 9:40 pm
I'll be really surprised if Obama actually turns up. Maybe I'm far too cynical but I can't see it happening.
38 posts
• Page 1 of 4 • 1, 2, 3, 4
-
- Related topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- Orly Taitz got 400,000 votes in cali for secretary of state
by eliakim » Thu Jun 17, 2010 11:53 pm - 4 Replies
- 184 Views
- Last post by illuminated

Fri Jun 18, 2010 6:01 am
- Orly Taitz got 400,000 votes in cali for secretary of state
-
- Palin Backs Trump's 'Birther' Questions
by torofamily » Mon Apr 11, 2011 1:46 am - 0 Replies
- 123 Views
- Last post by torofamily

Mon Apr 11, 2011 1:46 am
- Palin Backs Trump's 'Birther' Questions
-
- Arizona gov. vetoes presidential 'birther' bill
by truthseekerx » Tue Apr 19, 2011 3:00 pm - 4 Replies
- 227 Views
- Last post by spock

Tue Apr 19, 2011 7:58 pm
- Arizona gov. vetoes presidential 'birther' bill





