DTV Guest Talk - James Corbett- Take 2

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 3113
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 10:50 pm
Location: 2 Thirds Down The Bottle

PostSat Sep 21, 2013 9:24 am » by Toxic32


Bump. Just to keep us focused. Hopefully, tongue willing I will be able to take part in this time. :mrgreen:
I question everything. I don't believe anything I'm told or anything I see. Prove it, or fuck off. And that's not me I see in the mirror in the morning.

Member
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 4:30 am

PostSat Sep 21, 2013 4:23 pm » by stef


Hi James. in all your research have you come to the conclusion that ww3 is inevitable? and all that is going on now with the news reports of chemical weapons here there and everywhere is just a distraction while the evil-doers are getting ready to go underground? perhaps in the Ozarks?

Member
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 4:30 am

PostSat Sep 21, 2013 4:27 pm » by stef


Hi James. in all your research have you come to the conclusion that ww3 is inevitable? and all that is going on now with the news reports of chemical weapons here there and everywhere is just a distraction while the evil-doers are getting ready to go underground? perhaps in the Ozarks?

Super Moderator
User avatar
Posts: 9120
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 7:03 pm
Location: Inside You.

PostSat Sep 21, 2013 6:54 pm » by Troll2rocks


Hawk great stuff man, I think kinninigan will be around to capture. Possibly Noentry too, but he hasn't been on yet.

Look forward to hearing what he has to say :flop:


James Corbett Question:

With user rights on the World Wide Web being slowly eroded the world over, and recently with Tor a once thought safe zone for communications, being shown to be full of security exploits by MIT. Where do you feel the next attack on freedom of communications will come from, and how will it unfold?

:cheers:
Image
Censorship debunking & disinformation, it's all in a days work.

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 6307
Joined: Sat May 14, 2011 10:00 pm
Location: Zin-Uru

PostSat Sep 21, 2013 7:04 pm » by Kinninigan


Troll2rocks wrote:Hawk great stuff man, I think kinninigan will be around to capture. Possibly Noentry too, but he hasn't been on yet.

Look forward to hearing what he has to say :flop:


James Corbett Question:

With user rights on the World Wide Web being slowly eroded the world over, and recently with Tor a once thought safe zone for communications, being shown to be full of security exploits by MIT. Where do you feel the next attack on freedom of communications will come from, and how will it unfold?

:cheers:




last nite after chat i got a torrent for cyberlink 11, i was using version 7

this one has 64 bit and 3D video effects

hopefully the install and key generators work, ill set everything up later or tommorrow

alot of stuff to install.....


so yeah by tuesday i should be good!











:flop:
It was written in prophecy that a Gelfling would end Skeksis rule...
Image
https://www.youtube.com/user/kinninigan

Super Moderator
Online
User avatar
Posts: 18141
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2010 4:20 am
Location: underneath the circumstances

PostSat Sep 21, 2013 11:27 pm » by The57ironman


Kinninigan wrote:
so yeah by tuesday i should be good!

:flop:
.

....there's no Stairway nor bustle in the hedgerow!!

.

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 2841
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 10:47 am

PostSun Sep 22, 2013 12:50 pm » by Opalserpent


Spewing, I'll be working. :ohno: :bang;
Live by the Terror, Die by the Terror.

Conspirator
Online
User avatar
Posts: 8894
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 7:52 pm

PostSun Sep 22, 2013 4:28 pm » by Noentry


Image

James why do you choose to live and work in Japan?
Is Japan a safer place for you or is your choice an economical one?


How do you see this escalation towards an East West Cold war, being resolved with out bloodshed?

Have you ever meet Benjamin Fulford?
What do you think of what BF has to say?
Are you a member of a secret organization too?

Thanks for coming back to see us again.
:cheers:
"The third-rate mind is only happy when it is thinking with the majority.
The second-rate mind is only happy when it is thinking with the minority.
The first-rate mind is only happy when it is thinking."
A. A. Milne

Super Moderator
Online
User avatar
Posts: 18141
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2010 4:20 am
Location: underneath the circumstances

PostSun Sep 22, 2013 6:55 pm » by The57ironman


bump
.

....there's no Stairway nor bustle in the hedgerow!!

.

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 8096
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 9:08 am
Location: Next door

PostMon Sep 23, 2013 12:18 am » by Malogg


Image

How the Syrian Chemical Weapons Videos Were Staged

Image

In the wake of the Syrian chemical weapons attack, shocking footage of the victims of that attack were widely circulated in an effort to raise the ire of the public and spur support for military intervention.

Now, a new report on that footage finds troubling inconsistencies and manipulation with the video that calls the official narrative of the attack and its victims into question.

This is the GRTV Backgrounder on Global Research TV.


Upload to Disclose.tv



Earlier this week, UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon submitted the findings of the UN chemical weapons inspection team dispatched to Syria last month to gather evidence on the August 21st chemical weapons attack in Ghouta.

The report has been used as justification for the US and UK’s allegations that the attack originated from the Syrian government, but it does not in fact reach this conclusion. The inspection team’s mandate was limited to determining if an attack took place, not where it originated from, limiting their findings to a simple statement of fact:

“On the basis of the evidence obtained during our investigation of the Ghouta incident, the conclusion is that, on 21st August 2013, chemical weapons have been used in the ongoing conflict between the parties in the Syrian Arab Republic, also against civilians, including children, on a relatively large scale.”

The determination of where the attacks originated from is of course the key issue geopolitically speaking. If the attack originated with the Syrian government it would mark a serious escalation in the conflict, but if the weapons were launched by the terrorist insurgency it would mean the attack was a false flag provocation, designed to draw the US and its allies into armed military intervention in the country.

As analysts have been at pains to point out, the motive for such an attack has always suggested that it was more likely that the terrorists were the culprits in Ghouta, not the Syrian government. They have been losing the ground war against Syrian government forces for months, and they knew that the use of chemical weapons was the “red line” that Obama had set as the threshold for military intervention. Those who argue Assad’s culpability have to believe that not only did he suddenly and inexplicably resort to using chemical weapons on his own people for no strategic military reason, but that he waited until UN chemical weapons inspectors arrived in the country before doing so.

The background and history of the conflict also provide ample evidence that the terrorists have chemical weapons in their possession, and are trained and motivated to use them. Last December it was reported that US forces were training the terrorist forces in the the handling of chemical weapons. Also last December the insurgents released a video showing their chemical weapons operations and threatening to use them against government supporters. And in July of this year, Russia submitted an exhaustive 100-page report to the UN outlining how the terrorist insurgency was in fact to blame for the March 19th chemical weapons attack in Khan al-Asal on the outskirts of Aleppo.

But in the light of this latest chemical weapons attack, the UK, the US and France have all released their own intelligence studies blaming Assad for the incident and calling on the “international community” to increase pressure on the Syrian government. The reports, however, contradict each other in numerous places, with wildly different estimates of casualties in the events suggesting that the intelligence agencies that produced the report cannot even agree on the most basic details of the attack.

Now, new evidence is emerging that the attacks were used and manipulated by the terrorists in order to provoke the US and its allies into armed intervention in Syria. This evidence suggests that the videos used by the US and its allies to conclude what happened in Ghouta were in fact carefully stage managed to portray a narrative that would pin the blame for the attacks on Assad.

The first indications of this plot emerged early on, when expert analysis of the videos suggested inconsistencies in the footage itself.

That analysis was later expanded on by a report from ISTEAMS, a Syria-based human rights group working in conjunction with the International Institute for Peace, Justice and Human Rights. In this thorough report, published on GlobalResearch.ca on September 16th, numerous discrepancies and inconsistencies in the footage are documented.

The report documents through eyewitness testimony and video evidence that the affected areas had been largely abandoned by local residents in the days prior to the attack. Yet in the footage of the aftermath, there are large numbers of child victims who are portrayed. There exists very little footage of parents with their children, and what little footage exists portrays some of the parents apparently “discovering” their children on multiple occasions in different locations. Other footage shows the same children arranged in different formations in geographically distant neighborhoods. The report concludes that the footage was carefully stage managed to create the greatest emotional impact on foreign audiences. These videos were then used by the Obama administration to convince the Senate of their case for military intervention.

ISTEAMS President and one of the key researchers on the report, Mother Agnes Mariam, joined The Corbett Report to discuss the problems with the official narrative of the chemical weapon attack emanating from Washington and its allies last month.

The ISTEAMS report raises many troubling questions about the scenes in the Ghouta videos. Were the victims of the attack local children? If so, why were they there after these areas had been largely abandoned? Where are their parents? In the days after the attack, Dr. Bouthaina Shaaban, an advisor to the Assad government, provided an equally troubling answer to these questions to Sky News.

These reports dovetail with videos posted by the Mujahedeen Press Office to YouTube just six days before the attack confirming that the terrorists had kidnapped hundreds of women and children from the rural villages of Alawite stronghold Lattakia to use as bargaining chips in the conflict. Were these kidnap victims moved to Ghouta to be killed in the chemical weapons attack? Is this why so many children were there in these largely-vacated areas, and why so few parents appear on video mourning their children?

Although further research and investigation is urgently needed by third-party organizations to establish the identity of the Ghouta attack victims and the whereabouts of the kidnapped Lattakian families, the reports, if true, are evidence of the most disgraceful war crimes imaginable and the most cold-blooded manipulations of evidence to suit an agenda. Earlier this month, Global Research Director Michel Chossudovsky appeared on GRTV to discuss the nature of the terrorist insurgency.

Now, the US and its allies are trying to use the UN’s new report in combination with the video “evidence” of the attack’s aftermaths to justify the use of military force to back up the Syrian chemical disarmament process. Some are even calling for Assad to face war crimes prosecution on the back of this and similarly manipulated evidence.

In order to prevent this war agenda from proceeding any further or these propaganda images from being used in the pursuit of military intervention, it is vital that this latest ISTEAMS report is downloaded from Global Research, widely disseminated, and thoroughly investigated.

Complete Report of the ISTEAM: The Chemical Attacks in East Ghouta Used to Justify a Military Intervention in Syria (pdf)

See also:

The Chemical Attacks in East Ghouta Used to Justify a Military Intervention in Syria By Mother Agnes Mariam, September 16, 2013

Syria: Fabricating Chemical Lies. Who is Behind the East Ghouta Attacks?By Prof Michel Chossudovsky, September 17, 2013

Like this video? Visit our YouTube channel and click the “Subscribe” link to get the latest videos from Global Research!

Image

Tune into Global Research TV for the latest video updates from Global Research!

http://www.globalresearch.ca/how-the-sy ... ed/5350471


how-the-syrian-chemical-weapons-videos-were-staged-t87396.html
HAHA Image


PreviousNext

  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post
Visit Disclose.tv on Facebook