Earth just got slammed, possible major Earth Quake Warrning

Master Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 10110
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 10:10 pm
Location: Packing my stuff and moving to Denver like you should be doing

PostThu Mar 25, 2010 7:45 pm » by Savwafair2012


Image
FAIR USE NOTICE.
Section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, . http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 2973
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 2:13 am

PostThu Mar 25, 2010 8:03 pm » by Kingz


Wow good find man.... i'm curious what the Sun will bring us in the year 2010?

Maximum force when it hit Earth:
Image

Image

Image

Image
The Map Is Not The Territory, The Word Is Not The Object....
_______________________________________________________________
Image

Master Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 10110
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 10:10 pm
Location: Packing my stuff and moving to Denver like you should be doing

PostThu Mar 25, 2010 8:06 pm » by Savwafair2012




HE IS THE IMAGES :flop:
Image
FAIR USE NOTICE.
Section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, . http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 2973
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 2:13 am

PostThu Mar 25, 2010 8:08 pm » by Kingz


Image

Image

:think:
The Map Is Not The Territory, The Word Is Not The Object....
_______________________________________________________________
Image

Initiate
User avatar
Posts: 878
Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2010 4:42 am

PostFri Mar 26, 2010 5:08 pm » by nm156


I agree I think it will be a very large event that will happen in conjunction with the full moon on the 30th. The US would be my pick for the quake, I predicted this almost two weeks ago on another site (2012-comet.com). I got alot of flak over it from a couple of people. It would be really cool if I had one of you guys to help support the facts that are so present, yet considered psuedo-science. The Suns activity dictates for more control than most on that site will admit. There are also a couple of guys that are hard nosed disbelievers of any large object disrrupting our solar system from outside of it, and few support a binary system :bang; . I have a hard time explaining to their baligerant mindsets, I am convinced that they are related to the people who thought the world was flat 500 years ago. People of the caliber in this site would be a breath of fresh air, 2012-comet.com needs people like you guys, besides I feel a bit out numbered. But that does not mean I am a wimp with knowledge, it would just be cool to have some of the intellegent influence at this site there. I like this site the post roll over is much quicker. thanks Mitch
Anything of interest always comes at ones expense.

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 2040
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2009 12:31 pm

PostFri Mar 26, 2010 5:17 pm » by Nickelson


I recon California is next in line to experience a massive EQ 8.0

I really don’t hope so, but all the signs are predicting that direction.

Initiate
User avatar
Posts: 878
Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2010 4:42 am

PostFri Mar 26, 2010 6:07 pm » by nm156


My fear is that if it does hit it may strike in Southern Cali, ( south of LA ) there is an area of the San Andras Fault that hasn't moved in over 300 years. If it lets loose there I fear it could rupture all the way to Oregon or maybe even Washington. Hence wakeing Mt. Rainier, and the Cascade Sub-Duction Zone. I have friends in Riverside, Cali so I am, to say the least a bit concerned.
Anything of interest always comes at ones expense.

Writer
Posts: 93
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 2:50 pm

PostFri Mar 26, 2010 6:47 pm » by Mutjack


You were spot on big 6 just happened in chile :nails:

Master Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 10110
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 10:10 pm
Location: Packing my stuff and moving to Denver like you should be doing

PostFri Mar 26, 2010 6:59 pm » by Savwafair2012


MAP 6.2 2010/03/26 14:52:06 -27.985 -70.709 35.0 ATACAMA, CHILE

MAP 5.7 2010/03/26 10:39:03 -6.279 130.275 124.1 BANDA SEA

MAP 5.1 2010/03/26 09:36:57 -1.331 -15.853 10.0 NORTH OF ASCENSION
ISLAND

MAP 5.2 2010/03/26 05:33:12 -18.382 -173.234 34.0 TONGA

:think: I was expecting larger


But just look at these Image's. What Happened to the magnetosphere This is not normal

http://www2.nict.go.jp/y/y223/simulatio ... 032932.jpg

http://www2.nict.go.jp/y/y223/simulatio ... 034425.jpg

http://www2.nict.go.jp/y/y223/simulatio ... 035918.jpg

This is normal everyday stuff

http://www2.nict.go.jp/y/y223/simulatio ... 170015.jpg
Notice the differance :look:
Last edited by Savwafair2012 on Fri Mar 26, 2010 7:10 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Image
FAIR USE NOTICE.
Section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, . http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 2973
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 2:13 am

PostFri Mar 26, 2010 7:02 pm » by Kingz


Earthquake Details
Magnitude 6.2
Date-Time

* Friday, March 26, 2010 at 14:52:06 UTC
* Friday, March 26, 2010 at 10:52:06 AM at epicenter
* Time of Earthquake in other Time Zones

Location 27.985°S, 70.709°W
Depth 35 km (21.7 miles) set by location program
Region ATACAMA, CHILE
Distances 65 km (40 miles) N of Vallenar, Chile
80 km (50 miles) SSW of Copiapo, Chile
225 km (140 miles) NNE of Coquimbo, Chile
605 km (375 miles) N of SANTIAGO, Chile
Location Uncertainty horizontal +/- 13.1 km (8.1 miles); depth fixed by location program
Parameters NST=105, Nph=105, Dmin=113.5 km, Rmss=0.77 sec, Gp=130°,
M-type=teleseismic moment magnitude (Mw), Version=6
Source

* USGS NEIC (WDCS-D)

Event ID us2010uhay

Image
The Map Is Not The Territory, The Word Is Not The Object....
_______________________________________________________________
Image


Next

  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post
Visit Disclose.tv on Facebook