ET letters predicted Astroid and deflection - 1991 VG

Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2011 7:11 pm

PostSun Mar 06, 2011 9:20 pm » by Krsanna

The debate about the bizarre behavior of asteroid 1991 UV was ongoing for over a decade but has cooled considerably now. Letters written by an ET who predicted the asteroid and its deflection months in advance offer new insights into the historic asteroid.

The first letter was received, notarized and published by the UFO Contact Center International in Seattle, Washington, in June 1991. We are publishing them again now because another set of letters were received in February 2011. Strong evidence supported the 1991-92 letters but the 2011 letters provide no evidence nor new information.

The overriding question is why would anyone hoax new letters after 20 years? And who would benefit by doing that? The possibilities are too numerous to mention here. Is an effort underway to discredit genuine ET letters that provide evidence of an incoming asteroid?

Please take a look at the letters and see what you think.

I often use for references but have not previously posted on the forum. I apologize for making such a brief introduction but have serious concerns about the recent effort to hoax more letters with false information about Nibiru, a magnetic pole shift, and information of that ilk.

Krsanna Duran

User avatar
Posts: 5994
Joined: Sun Jun 07, 2009 2:38 am
Location: My happy place

PostSun Mar 06, 2011 9:26 pm » by Newearthman

Cool never heard of this letter before, reading it now.

Super Moderator
User avatar
Posts: 21123
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2010 3:20 am
Location: Odin's Palace

PostSun Mar 06, 2011 9:58 pm » by The57ironman



if you don't like my opinions....please lower your standards Image


User avatar
Posts: 5994
Joined: Sun Jun 07, 2009 2:38 am
Location: My happy place

PostSun Mar 06, 2011 10:17 pm » by Newearthman

I'm pretty impressed with the first 5 letters. I like the crop circle explanations and how he combinds words to say 2 things at once.

User avatar
Posts: 4007
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2011 8:03 pm

PostMon Mar 07, 2011 12:07 am » by Rydher

I'm still reading these as it's an interesting read. I'm up to letter 6 and I assume there was some back and forth going with the people that were given the letters and where they were posted? A line from the 'aliens' letter seems a bit off, when compared to everything else so far.

Apparently, the accurate predictions of the ozone status, the November meteor, and the crop circle eventings was not enough “proof” for the dull-witted among you. You might desire me to dance on the White House lawn.-

Without knowing the backstory the posting of these letters and who he's referring to. It seems a bit off coming from a 500 year old alien that is an empath that specializes in conflict resolution?

A way of terming my job is that of an Empath-Arbitrator. I specialize in Planet-Member In’duction and Crisis Resolution

Posts: 586
Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2008 9:46 pm
Location: Off-planet (Warwickshire UK)

PostMon Mar 07, 2011 12:15 am » by Gunzenbomz

Krsanna Duran welcome, good vibes bud!!

Interesting site letters4earth.

  • Related topics
    Last post