Extraterrestrial Alien DNA Found In Starchild Skull
20 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
- kolbrinstruth
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2010 4:40 pm
You might like:
Sun Aug 15, 2010 5:21 am » by kolbrinstruth
Heres the video you need,been following and waiting for this for years,never doubted the results.Also the jealousy on this site is sickening man,it seems if some one is new or maybe not very tech minded and he posts an average or done before subject,hes helped abit anyway.But if he's got an excellent post theres someone there to jump on him 
Anyway props man also I wonder if the fibres in the skull have anything in common with the fibres of this MORGELLONS disease.Jeez could be a thread right there
Anyway props man also I wonder if the fibres in the skull have anything in common with the fibres of this MORGELLONS disease.Jeez could be a thread right there- Princessleia
-
- Posts: 773
- Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2009 9:07 am
Sun Aug 15, 2010 2:53 pm » by Princessleia
kolbrinstruth wrote: Heres the video you need,been following and waiting for this for years,never doubted the results.
Thanks for contributing a video, can't wait to view it!
Wed Sep 01, 2010 5:11 pm » by Brucelee
What rubbish!
Since we don't know what Alien DNA actually looks like or have sample to compare it to, then "Alien" DNA could NOT have been found..
Even if the DNA testing is genuine and can be verified by established labs, all they have found is that a small part of the DNA had no match in the existing database.
That however doesn't mean an extra terrestrial origin.
The DNA could be corrupted enough so as not to yield a reliable result. or indeed a newly discovered or catalogued mutation could have been discovered.....again a BIG BIG leap to assume that if something isn't in the current database it is extra terrestrial.
Let's not forget science has only recently discovered rock eating organisms and the "starchild" was found in a copper mine which it may have been in for 900 years.....who knows what contamination the skull went through.
Whatever the skulls origin......one thing is for certain:
Extra terrestrial DNA was NOT found in the "Starchild"
Since we don't know what Alien DNA actually looks like or have sample to compare it to, then "Alien" DNA could NOT have been found..
Even if the DNA testing is genuine and can be verified by established labs, all they have found is that a small part of the DNA had no match in the existing database.
That however doesn't mean an extra terrestrial origin.
The DNA could be corrupted enough so as not to yield a reliable result. or indeed a newly discovered or catalogued mutation could have been discovered.....again a BIG BIG leap to assume that if something isn't in the current database it is extra terrestrial.
Let's not forget science has only recently discovered rock eating organisms and the "starchild" was found in a copper mine which it may have been in for 900 years.....who knows what contamination the skull went through.
Whatever the skulls origin......one thing is for certain:
Extra terrestrial DNA was NOT found in the "Starchild"
Last edited by Brucelee on Wed Sep 01, 2010 5:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Wed Sep 01, 2010 5:17 pm » by Brucelee
ufoblogger wrote:http://www.ufo-blogger.com/2010/08/extraterrestrial-alien-dna-starchild.html
Ufo blogger!
Since nobody actually knows what Alien DNA looks like, then noone can say that Extra terrestrial DNA has been found.
"No matches found" in the database is QUITE different.....and may have a number of terrestrial reasons to explain it!
- Cricketine
-
- Posts: 323
- Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 4:55 am
Wed Sep 01, 2010 9:54 pm » by Cricketine
I too have been following this story for a while, but I'm curious as to why the government has not taken action to seize the skull.
Is there any info out there about this?
Is there any info out there about this?
Wed Sep 01, 2010 10:58 pm » by Spock
I never understood the report to mean "alien" as in "ALIEN" all caps. Just unmapped/unknown/unaccounted for findings. If the video is true, and the results of the test are accurate, then it is as bizarre as it gets.
Reminded me of the "alien mummy" episode of Destination Truth.
Reminded me of the "alien mummy" episode of Destination Truth.
ATHEISM:
The belief there was once absolutely nothing. Nothing happened to the nothing until the nothing exploded into everything. Then all of the exploded everything rearranged itself, into self-replicating bits which turned into dinosaurs.
The belief there was once absolutely nothing. Nothing happened to the nothing until the nothing exploded into everything. Then all of the exploded everything rearranged itself, into self-replicating bits which turned into dinosaurs.
- Cognoscenti
- Posts: 503
- Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 2:09 pm
Wed Sep 01, 2010 11:16 pm » by Cognoscenti
A single point mutation could not possibly result in this range of grossly abnormal anatomical differences compared to humans. Sickle cell anemia, for example, is the result of a single point mutaion on chromosome 11 causing a single amino acid substitution on the beta hemoglobin molecule. At the other end of the sectrum Down's syndrome is caused by an entire extra complete or nearly complete chromosome 21. More profound chromosomal abnormalities result in nonviable fetuses. The biochemistry of the bone is completely different from a human's and therefore completely different from all primates and mammals.
Wed Sep 01, 2010 11:41 pm » by Spock
YEA!!! What that guy said! 
ATHEISM:
The belief there was once absolutely nothing. Nothing happened to the nothing until the nothing exploded into everything. Then all of the exploded everything rearranged itself, into self-replicating bits which turned into dinosaurs.
The belief there was once absolutely nothing. Nothing happened to the nothing until the nothing exploded into everything. Then all of the exploded everything rearranged itself, into self-replicating bits which turned into dinosaurs.
- Leonidas1977
- Posts: 776
- Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2010 6:12 pm
Thu Sep 02, 2010 12:19 am » by Leonidas1977
england has the largest dna data base on earth, not only of crooks and humans but of just about every living thing on this planet, we are now registering the dna codes of plants food sources and so forth. if the dna that is unidentified in this skull cant be found from any kind of other living thing on earth then the evidence speaks for its self not of earth origen. good post i have been following this too. dont let the basterds grind you down
- Leonidas1977
- Posts: 776
- Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2010 6:12 pm
Thu Sep 02, 2010 12:20 am » by Leonidas1977
spock wrote:YEA!!! What that guy said!
lmaoooo big up spock
20 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
-
- Related topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- Extraterrestrial DNA Found In 900 Year Old Starchild Skull !
by zigoapex » Fri Aug 13, 2010 11:45 pm - 1 Replies
- 597 Views
- Last post by kolbrinstruth
Sun Aug 15, 2010 5:44 am
- Extraterrestrial DNA Found In 900 Year Old Starchild Skull !
-
- Alien chip found in the skull of Napoleon Bonaparte
1, 2by andgene » Fri Feb 19, 2010 6:51 pm - 17 Replies
- 6301 Views
- Last post by giusdude
Sat Feb 20, 2010 12:33 am
- Alien chip found in the skull of Napoleon Bonaparte
-
- Alien chip found in the skull of Napoleon Bonaparte
1, 2, 3by malogg » Sat Sep 10, 2011 4:38 pm - 24 Replies
- 1744 Views
- Last post by glassjaw667
Sat Sep 10, 2011 6:59 pm
- Alien chip found in the skull of Napoleon Bonaparte
-
- Alien chip found in the skull of Napoleon Bonaparte?
by blaborde1488 » Mon Sep 19, 2011 1:20 pm - 4 Replies
- 594 Views
- Last post by khnumkhufu
Mon Sep 19, 2011 2:04 pm
- Alien chip found in the skull of Napoleon Bonaparte?
-
- Will the Starchild Skull Convince You?
1, 2by cornbread714 » Sat Jun 13, 2009 3:44 am - 14 Replies
- 959 Views
- Last post by casey2020
Wed Jun 17, 2009 10:16 pm
- Will the Starchild Skull Convince You?