FEMA camp bill resurfaces in Congress
- The57ironman

-
- Posts: 15438
- Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2010 4:20 am
- Location: going off the rails on the crazy train
.....wrinkles are something other people have, similar to my character lines.
It looks as if Representative Alcee Hastings a Democrat from Florida has decided to reintroduce his FEMA Camp bill. A few years ago I was the first person to write an article about this awful piece of legislation. Fortunately, I was successful in exposing it to a much larger group of people via the alternative media and the bill did not move forward in the legislative process. The latest iteration of this bill has been introduced as House Resolution 390 otherwise known as the National Emergency Centers Establishment Act. This bill would authorize not fewer than 6 military installations as sites for the establishment of national emergency centers to be run by FEMA under the command of the Secretary of Homeland Security.
I was extremely critical of an earlier version of the bill which was proposed in the 111th Congress as HR 645. The bill used vague language to give the Secretary of Homeland Security carte blanche power to use these facilities for anything that the Secretary felt was appropriate. In other words if the Secretary of Homeland Security felt like using them as death camps than potentially that could have been considered a lawful use of the facilities according to the language in the bill. In this new version it looks like Representative Hastings got the message and decided to remove the vague language even though the Secretary of Homeland Security would still be in charge of the proposed facilities.
One of the minimum requirements of a national emergency center as defined by the bill is that it is capable of meeting for an extended period of time the housing, health, transportation, education, public works, humanitarian and other transition needs of a large number of individuals affected by an emergency or major disaster. It basically sounds like a concentration camp. Similar types of facilities were setup by Franklin Delano Roosevelt during World War II to house large numbers of Japanese Americans. In other words, there is historical precedence for the federal government forcibly relocating large numbers of people into government run concentration camps. There is an increasing amount of rhetoric from the federal government and corporate media that Constitutionalists, gun owners and other liberty minded people might be considered potential terrorists. Would it really be a stretch to think that these facilities could be used to house people that they consider to be enemies?
Considering how much the federal government has lied to the American people in the past, you would be absolutely insane to.......Read More
I was extremely critical of an earlier version of the bill which was proposed in the 111th Congress as HR 645. The bill used vague language to give the Secretary of Homeland Security carte blanche power to use these facilities for anything that the Secretary felt was appropriate. In other words if the Secretary of Homeland Security felt like using them as death camps than potentially that could have been considered a lawful use of the facilities according to the language in the bill. In this new version it looks like Representative Hastings got the message and decided to remove the vague language even though the Secretary of Homeland Security would still be in charge of the proposed facilities.
One of the minimum requirements of a national emergency center as defined by the bill is that it is capable of meeting for an extended period of time the housing, health, transportation, education, public works, humanitarian and other transition needs of a large number of individuals affected by an emergency or major disaster. It basically sounds like a concentration camp. Similar types of facilities were setup by Franklin Delano Roosevelt during World War II to house large numbers of Japanese Americans. In other words, there is historical precedence for the federal government forcibly relocating large numbers of people into government run concentration camps. There is an increasing amount of rhetoric from the federal government and corporate media that Constitutionalists, gun owners and other liberty minded people might be considered potential terrorists. Would it really be a stretch to think that these facilities could be used to house people that they consider to be enemies?
Considering how much the federal government has lied to the American people in the past, you would be absolutely insane to.......Read More

http://ufomaniacs.blogspot.com/
http://tiny.cc/Rizzesearch
"The greatest things on earth are us,supposedly.
Why don't we act accordingly, with humanity" Rizze
-
- Related topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- FEMA Camps - U.S. bill to legalise them.
by towelie » Tue Jan 27, 2009 10:55 pm - 8 Replies
- 293 Views
- Last post by dodgeman

Thu Jan 29, 2009 5:50 am
- FEMA Camps - U.S. bill to legalise them.
-
- 66 'effeminate' boys sent to gay 'cure' camp in Malaysia
by sid2011 » Wed Apr 20, 2011 9:42 am - 2 Replies
- 392 Views
- Last post by giusdude

Wed Apr 20, 2011 3:51 pm
- 66 'effeminate' boys sent to gay 'cure' camp in Malaysia
-
- shots fired at youth camp near Oslo
1, 2, 3by zegtelzegtel » Fri Jul 22, 2011 6:30 pm - 23 Replies
- 1137 Views
- Last post by truthseeker

Fri Jul 29, 2011 9:13 am
- shots fired at youth camp near Oslo
-
- Scientology Child Labour Camp in Australia
by 2020vision » Thu Feb 23, 2012 7:02 pm - 5 Replies
- 287 Views
- Last post by kinninigan

Thu Feb 23, 2012 7:39 pm
- Scientology Child Labour Camp in Australia
-
- Plea for help from Chinese labor camp worker
by Poooooot » Thu Dec 27, 2012 11:09 pm - 2 Replies
- 178 Views
- Last post by domdabears

Thu Dec 27, 2012 11:21 pm
- Plea for help from Chinese labor camp worker





and
from new england bro...
